Dragonswood. Lets see:
- It’s from the young adult fa
Dragonswood. Lets see:
- It’s from the young adult fantasy genre
- It can be read as a stand-alone novel
This was what I was looking for after an exhausting stretch of dystopias and PNRs. But, unfortunately, I couldn’t love Dragonswood completely. It seems I don’t know what I want. This book gave me the crazy awesome of fantasy – like dragons and witch hunts and prisoners in the tower – but the romance aspect was so drab it had me missing the arrogant heroes I normally don’t give the time of day.
Here comes the smoulder
The characters had a good rapport with one another, but the actual ‘love’ seemed kind of arbitrary. The scenes with the two love interests weren’t boring, but I didn’t get any sense of heat when they were together, and the resolution to the romance was very rushed. The connection Tess has with Meg and Poppy was one of the most enjoyable aspects, but as the novel progressed and the love interest hit the scene, their particular story arc seemed to fizzle out.
What I Loved:
The writing was quite good, and the central storyline was an interesting one. Overall, it was an enjoyable YA fantasy despite my few gripes.
Also, the author mentions the main character having her period, which I find strangely endearing. I’m always glad when that aspect of being a woman is included – it feels like a slap of reality. YA novels that do mention it are usually from the fantasy/historical genre, or gritty contemporary fiction. I think it’s a bit silly how such a universal recurrence is so absent from teen lit, especially in cases where it would seem logical that the subject would at least cross the character’s mind.
What Was Lacking:
There was no explanation of one rather important factor – or if there was an explanation, it has slipped by me. It is a pivotal point that the royal family have dragon blood – suggesting a dragon somewhere in their heritage. I don’t understand how a dragon would make its way into the human gene pool – through mating? It seemed bizarre, like Dragonswood was suddenly being confused with a dragon/human erotica of the same name.
However, I found out after reading this that there is a companion novel published a few years before, which I haven’t read, and it might have been explained therein. Still, it seems strange not to rehash it clearly in Dragonswood.
Also, the resolution to the story left a lot to be desired, not in terms of loose ends, but just unsatisfying endings for characters I cared about, and who I thought the heroine cared about too.
[Spoilers: skip over if you don't want to know some characters' fates
I was upset that Tess was fairly apathetic towards her mother remaining with her abusive husband and having another child. If you had been beaten so severely by your father that your ear was deafened and permanently deformed, would you resign your mother and brother to a life of the same treatment? I was very let down by the characters self-interest when it came to that particular development.]
Quote:
“Even from behind, I knew the seated man was Garth. I'd seen him in chair, saddle, and by a campfire. I'd known him running with his hounds, grooming his horses, leaning back to look at the stars from the branches of a pine tree, hunched with concentration whittling a doll, carrying Alice through a storm, and even sparring with a dragon. A woman will know a man from all sides after that.”
I won’t say don’t read this, but I will say that if you are a bit pickier with your fantasy you might prefer to wait for Seraphina in July 2012. Rachel Hartman takes similar ideas and just knocks it right out of the park.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.