Down the Tracks, But Not Far Enough
In the cognitivist view, the ego is the collection of core beliefs, values, idea(l)s, assumptions, convictions and attitudes that appraises, interprets, evaluates, judges, assesses, analyzes and attributes meaning to experience and colors our emotional responses thereto. Those who have transcended their egos have looked long and hard at their core beliefs, values, assumptions, etc., and come to grips with how their appraisals, interpretations, evaluations, etc., have controlled their minds and effected their emotions and behavior.
Ego transcendence is never complete; it is never a matter of arrival so much as continued journey. While I know Beattie would agree, the latest of her 16 successful -- and very useful -- books on codependence makes it clear that even though she has come far since Codependent No More and Beyond Codependency (written in the late `80s), she has further to go and either doesn't know that, or does and isn't saying so.
Presumptuous as it is for me to say, like Cermak, Engle, Evans, Lissette & Krauss, Mellody (with whom she is often confused, but should not be), Rapson & English, the Weinholds and others who have explored the topic in the past two decades, Beattie is a fine synthesizer of what she has learned and worked with. But, like most pop psych writers, she does not know what she does not know. And that is plenty.
I have learned from her work, as well as from others, about what Sullivan and Benjamin call "parataxical integration," what Stephen Karpman called "racing around the drama triangle," and what I've termed myself to be "reciprocal reactivity."
Beattie opened the door of insight for millions and helped to spawn a 12 Step recovery movement. But she only opened that door part way, and her theoretical limitations have kept that door in that position for many whose understandable, slavish adherence to what has been published limits their capacities to explore further and causes them to foreclose to One Way Only. That's not her fault, but neither does she address the issue and warn her readers in any depth.
Sadly, she (and other less educated authors, including many with advanced degrees) has unintentionally helped those of similarly limited vision turn Codependents Anonymous into a religion, rather than an endless journey of truly spiritual exploration. Narrowmindedness, absolutism, dogmatism and foreclosure are the essential problems of the codependent to begin with. Unless those (and other) concepts are explored, questioned and either revised or rejected outright, one can be expected to continue to have problems.
Beattie has been at her best in books like The Language of Letting Go where she was forced by format to keep her essays brief and to the point, as well as closer to reporting her actual transformational experiences, as opposed to trying to guide others with "good ideas."
She is a journalist and an addictions counselor; not a post-doctoral psychologist with a mind full of far more sophisticated, concept-illuminated epxerience and grasp of mental operation, brain function, traumatology or evidence-based treatment methods. When she attempts to set forth an organized treatment system, as she has done before and does again here, she is out way over her depth...
2 out of 12 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.