A Terrible Glory: Custer and the Little Bighorn - the Last Great Battle of the American West

Overview

In June of 1876, on a desolate hill above a winding river called "the Little Bighorn," George Armstrong Custer and all 210 men under his direct command were annihilated by almost 2,000 Sioux and Cheyenne. The news of this devastating loss caused a public uproar, and those in positions of power promptly began to point fingers in order to avoid responsibility. Custer, who was conveniently dead, took the brunt of the blame.

The truth, however, ...

See more details below
Paperback (Reprint)
$11.05
BN.com price
(Save 35%)$17.00 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (52) from $2.43   
  • New (15) from $3.78   
  • Used (37) from $2.43   
A Terrible Glory: Custer and the Little Bighorn - the Last Great Battle of the American West

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK Study
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$9.99
BN.com price

Overview

In June of 1876, on a desolate hill above a winding river called "the Little Bighorn," George Armstrong Custer and all 210 men under his direct command were annihilated by almost 2,000 Sioux and Cheyenne. The news of this devastating loss caused a public uproar, and those in positions of power promptly began to point fingers in order to avoid responsibility. Custer, who was conveniently dead, took the brunt of the blame.

The truth, however, was far more complex. A TERRIBLE GLORY is the first book to relate the entire story of this endlessly fascinating battle, and the first to call upon all the significant research and findings of the past twenty-five years--which have changed significantly how this controversial event is perceived. Furthermore, it is the first book to bring to light the details of the U.S. Army cover-up--and unravel one of the greatest mysteries in U.S. military history.

Scrupulously researched, A TERRIBLE GLORY will stand as ta landmark work. Brimming with authentic detail and an unforgettable cast of characters--from Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse to Ulysses Grant and Custer himself--this is history with the sweep of a great novel.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble
"We scouts thought there were too many Indians for Custer to fight… It was the biggest Indian camp I had ever seen." Of course, in hindsight, the 1876 massacre of George Armstrong Custer and his 210 soldiers seemed inevitable, playing out like a predestined Wild West tragedy. But as James Donovan skillfully reconstructs it in this book, the so-called Battle of Little Bighorn actually unfolded through a disturbing mix of mishaps, character flaws, cowardice, military inexperience, and insubordination. Drawing on recently uncovered findings, Donovan shows how finger-pointing and cover-ups followed quickly on the heels of disaster. History with the feel of immediacy.
Publishers Weekly

In this labor of love, Donovan collects the multiple threads that led to the 1876 massacre at Little Big Horn. By the 1870s various American Indian tribes ignored the American government's edict to relocate to reservations. Growth in pioneer settlements had produced so many clashes that western commander Philip Sheridan ordered three army columns to converge on an immense Indian encampment in southern Montana Territory. Donovan's eye-opening description of these cavalrymen contradicts the Hollywood image. These troops were untrained, inexperienced in individual combat and poorly equipped. Custer, the first to encounter the enemy encampment, split his forces before attacking. This tactical error ensured that some units would survive the fighting, here described in vivid detail. Custer's last stand became the Indians', too. Though the army was happy to blame the debacle on the dead Custer, the battle's survivors banded together to ensure no reputation went tarnished in public hearings. The author makes a good case for Custer as scapegoat by portraying him as a likable Civil War hero, flamboyant publicity hound and more experienced Indian fighter than most of his men and all of his commanders,. Exhaustive research, lively prose and fresh interpretation make for a valuable addition to literature on this otherwise well-trodden historical event. (Mar. 24)

Copyright 2007 Reed Business Information
Library Journal

Recent decades have seen important new findings regarding the Battle of the Little Bighorn. What has been needed next is a clear narrative for scholars and lay readers alike embracing all of the recent research; literary agent Donovan has written just that. First he provides the context of the campaign of 1876 from both the Native American and the U.S. Army perspectives, with the essential background on the major players. Then he presents what he considers the most likely sequence of events of the battle itself, based on archaeological and other research findings, along with the many Native American accounts that have become available and a careful review of the traditional sources. Rather than interrupting his fast-paced narrative with asides on his sources, Donovan wisely places such discussion in the notes, making them available to scholars and serious Custer students. The final quarter of the book is devoted to the aftermath of the battle, particularly the court of inquiry. Donovan shows the extent to which the army and surviving members of the Seventh Cavalry went to put all of the blame on Custer in what today would be called a cover-up. This book is an excellent starting point for those seeking an understanding of the Battle of the Little Bighorn. Highly recommended for public and academic libraries.
—Stephen H. Peters

Kirkus Reviews
Comprehensive account of George Custer's career. Dallas-based literary agent Donovan does much kind service to Custer, who has long been without champions. We think of Custer as vainglorious and foolhardy, thanks in great measure to Arthur Penn's 1970 film Little Big Man; only a vain man would have dressed like a longhaired gypsy dandy and gone galloping off to fight every Indian in the West, right? Donovan finds the upside: Custer dressed colorfully and wore his hair long in the interest of conspicuousness, reasoning that "if his men saw their commanding officer share the danger, they would fight even harder." He always made a point to be at the head of the action, golden locks and bright red scarf gleaming. There was a reason that Custer was the youngest general in the Union Army. At places such as Gettysburg, he distinguished himself by brave action against heavy odds, and his Michigan horsemen "quickly earned a reputation as the best brigade in the cavalry corps." Yet something seems to have happened to Custer out West. He shared the general disdain of the white soldiers for their Indian opponents, hubris that cost a young captain named William Fetterman and his men their lives and set in motion the events that would culminate in Little Bighorn-and later, Wounded Knee. But Donovan is no agenda-laden, blind defender of Custer; he carefully notes the results of the inquiry that followed the famed slaughter, when Custer's commanding general damned him for "negligence and outright insubordination." His thoroughgoing account lends considerable humanity to all involved, from the Hunkpapa warrior Rain-in-the-Face to the ordinary privates who died with Custer on that hot June day in Montana.A worthy companion to Jay Monahan's Custer, Evan S. Connell's Son of the Morning Star and other standard studies of the famed cavalryman. Agent: BJ Robbins/BJ Robbins Literary Agency
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780316067478
  • Publisher: Little, Brown and Company
  • Publication date: 5/14/2009
  • Edition description: Reprint
  • Pages: 560
  • Sales rank: 191,285
  • Product dimensions: 5.50 (w) x 8.10 (h) x 1.50 (d)

Meet the Author

James Donovan

As a literary agent over the past ten years James Donovan has sold several bestselling nonfiction titles; previous to that he was a bookstore chain buyer and a trade book editor. He has also written several books, the most recent of which was the coffee-table tome Custer and the Little Bighorn (Voyageur Press, 2001), a main selection of the Military Book Club. He lives in Dallas.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt


A Terrible Glory

By James Donovan Little, Brown and Company
Copyright © 2008
James Donovan
All right reserved.

ISBN: 978-0-316-15578-6


Chapter One The Divine Injunction

Again, we come to the great law of right. The white race stood upon this undeveloped continent ready and willing to execute the Divine injunction, to replenish the earth and subdue it.... The Indian races were in the wrongful possession of a continent required by the superior right of the white man. Charles Bryant, HISTORY OF THE GREAT MASSACRE BY THE SIOUX INDIANS (1864)

Philip Henry Sheridan, tough, fearless, and tenacious, like the bulldog he resembled, faced a thorny problem in the fall of 1875-several thousand of them, actually. A small contingent of Plains Indians, roaming the same lands they had occupied for generations, refused to bow to the manifest destiny of the nation he had so devoutly served for more than twenty years.

Sheridan's dilemma was a multifaceted one. From his headquarters in Chicago, he commanded the Division of the Missouri, by far the largest and most problematic military region in the country. It comprised the Great Plains and more-indeed, almost half the nation's territory, from the Canadian border to the tip of Texas, from Chicago to the Rockies. That expanse included most of the western states, five territories, a growing number of whites, and approximately 175,000 Indians of many different tribes. Over the past half century, most of those Indians had been herded onto reservations set aside for their use, both to keep them away from the westering whites and to facilitate the effort to make them, as much as possible, white people. The problems stemming from these relocations were monumental, though they were perceived by most whites as more humane, and considerably less expensive, than the alternative: war.

The U.S. government soon found out that it was one thing to assign tribes to reservations and quite another to keep them there-especially when the food rations and supplies promised them by treaty were delayed, stolen, inedible, or simply never delivered. What had been presented as a policy designed to prevent bloodshed soon became yet another rationale for it.

Sheridan's dilemma was shared by his immediate superior, General of the Army William Tecumseh Sherman, President Ulysses S. Grant, and several high-ranking members of Grant's administration. For years the two Generals had advocated all-out war on the Indians, with Sheridan, who had branded the uncooperative elements of the Plains tribes "hostiles," especially single-minded on the subject. But certain legal and moral niceties, which Sheridan found supremely irritating, precluded such belligerence. Grant's infernal "Peace Policy," which stressed humanitarian reforms before military intervention, was one. Treaties made with various Indian tribes were another. A third (and particularly galling) obstacle was that weakkneed portion of the eastern intelligentsia whose naive, romantic view of "Lo the poor Indian" (a phrase from a poem by Alexander Pope, which led to the use of "Lo," with heavy frontier wit, as the generic name for the Indian) was formed by such unrealistic sources as the novels of James Fenimore Cooper and the poetry of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow.

But that November, at a high-level meeting at the White House, a bold solution to the Indian problem would be revealed.

Until a few years previous, the Plains tribes had roamed at will. During the warmer months, they followed the buffalo, or bison, their source of food, clothing, shelter, and virtually every other material (and spiritual) need. Before the unforgiving winter swept down, they gathered up their stores of meat and then holed up in sheltered valleys along moving water to wait out the weather, as close to hibernation as a people could get. Until the new grass appeared in the spring, their ponies grew considerably thinner, surviving on the bark of riparian cottonwoods. The Indians, too, were vulnerable in winter, but they knew the wasichus (whites) were reluctant to launch any extended large-scale campaign then. A plains winter could turn deadly in a matter of hours, and heavy supply trains to feed men and mounts slowed a column even in the best of weather. The white soldiers had waged winter war once or twice, but that kind of campaign was difficult to muster and coordinate.

As emigrant travel through the heart of Sioux country increased, the monumental job of protecting incoming miners, farmers, ranchers, tradesmen, stockmen, railroad surveyors, lawmen, barbers, saloon owners, and others in an area of more than a million square miles fell to Sheridan, who commanded almost a third of the shrunken remnants of the victorious Federal army. More than two million men had served the Union during the Civil War, but more than half had mustered out a year after its end, and the regular army had gradually been trimmed to 25,000 enlisted men by the early 1870s. The nation was understandably tired of war, and a southern- controlled Congress found the idea of a large standing army distasteful. Undermanned, underpaid, undersupplied, undertrained, and underfed (a decade after Appomattox, Civil War-era hardtack was still being issued to frontier troops), the army Sheridan served faced a warrior culture that trained males from early childhood to fight, ride, and survive better than anyone else in the world. These people knew every hill and valley and water source in their wide land and eluded their pursuers with ease.

The job, Sheridan knew, had been easier, or at least simpler, a half century earlier. All that was necessary then was to push the Indians west, beyond "The Line"-wherever it was at the time.

The Line, which had existed almost since the white man had begun to penetrate the vastness to the west, was the result of more than three centuries of clashes between Europeans and the native population. Spanish conquistadors had clashed constantly with the native inhabitants of Florida during their many expeditions in search of gold and other treasures. In the epic Battle of Mabila in 1540, in the area later known as Alabama, Hernando de Soto and several hundred Spaniards had destroyed an entire army of thousands of Indians to the last man. To the north, in the swampy Tidewater region of Virginia, the two-hundred-village-strong Powhatan Confederacy had aided the ill-prepared English settlers at Jamestown since their arrival in 1607. The generous Indians had brought food to the starving colonists, given freely of their considerable agricultural knowledge, and generally made it possible for the English to survive the first few years of the settlement's existence. (They also taught the whites how to cultivate a cash crop called tobacco, which would enable the foundation and rapid rise of several more southern colonies.) Their generosity was not repaid in kind. The settlers were soon told by their superiors-who were, after all, directors of a for-profit joint-stock company-to do whatever it took to acquire all the land they could. Indian tempers grew short after a series of humiliations and attacks (no doubt aided and abetted by the Spaniards to the south), and fifteen years later they mounted a large-scale surprise assault on the colony that resulted in 347 English deaths in a matter of a few hours. The surviving colonists vowed revenge, and fifty years of almost constant eye-for-an-eye warfare followed. By 1671 the Virginia governor could report to London that "the Indians, our neighbours, are absolutely subjected, so that there is no fear in them"-in no small part because there were only a few thousand of them left in the face of 40,000 Englishmen.

Over the next century, until the American Revolution, white men wrested North American territory from the Indians by treaty, sale, or sheer force-sometimes, truth be told, in concert with tribes seeking an advantage in Indian vs. Indian warfare. From the very beginning, the Europeans, with few exceptions, had perceived America's native inhabitants as no more than savages-romantic, perhaps, in their primitiveness, and occasionally charming, or worthy of pity, but savages nonetheless. Whites had little respect for Indian cultures, their ways of life, or their concepts of government and landownership-the latter being particularly antithetical to white views. Indians did not develop the land, nor did they measure and mark what they owned; they simply did not understand land as private property. One could no more own the earth than the sky, the Indians reasoned. Rather, their land was commonly owned and used. To the ceaselessly toiling New World colonists, whose way of life was rooted in property ownership, this outlook was positively sacrilegious. This difference, more than anything else, would lead to the struggles between the two peoples.

For the British, the end of the French and Indian War in 1763 resulted in huge additions of contested western territories ceded by the defeated French. But the excitement on the part of the colonials-who felt somewhat justifiably that they, not their distant British landlords, had "won" the new lands and should have the right to develop them-was dampened by George III's Royal Proclamation of 1763. The new law forbade settlement on "any Lands beyond the Heads or Sources of any of the Rivers which fall into the Atlantic Ocean from the West and Northwest," including the verdant Ohio Valley and all of the territory from the Ohio to the Mississippi rivers-roughly anything west of the Appalachians, from the southern limits of the province of Quebec in the north to Florida in the south. This area was referred to as "Indian territory," and all Englishmen were directed to abandon it immediately, regardless of title changes ("great Frauds and Abuses have been committed in purchasing Lands of the Indians ... to the great Dissatisfaction of the said Indians"). All Indian peoples were declared to be under the protection of the King, and provisions for royal posts along the boundary were made.

The motivations behind the King's proclamation were more practical than humanitarian. Relations between the Indians and the colonists were already poor. Most of the Indian tribes had sided with the French during the war, and by placating the natives, the proclamation would, it was hoped, reduce the costs of defending the frontier. The boundary and the Indian preserve it established were meant to be temporary, the first step in a controlled, deliberate settlement plan. Five years later, after considerable colonist lobbying, the Indian Boundary Line was established farther to the west and formally agreed to in treaties with the Indians. But later that same year, due to a change in the British ministry, the Crown discontinued maintenance of the plan. The increasingly restive colonists believed that the edict had another purpose: to keep them close to the eastern seaboard and easier to control-and away from the lucrative fur trade farther west.

The Proclamation of 1763 represented the last time that Indian sovereignty in the interior of the new land was considered important to the causes of peace and trade. Settlers and land speculators alike ignored the decree and worked to open the western frontier and claim the Indian lands. Thirteen years later, two of the many grievances listed in the Declaration of Independence addressed the Crown's protection of "the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions" and royal resistance to "new Appropriations of Lands." (A year earlier, at the dawn of the American Revolution, the Continental Congress had instituted an Indian policy, largely to maintain peaceful relations during the ensuing war, though most eastern Indian tribes predictably sided with the British.) Once independence was established, however, the young Republic's first President, George Washington, sought to apply solid moral precepts to all dealings with the Indians: "The basis of our proceedings with the Indian nations," he said, "has been, and shall be justice." The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 pledged goodwill and respect for the Indians' property, rights, and liberty. One of Washington's first acts as president was to issue the Proclamation of 1790, which forbade state or private-sector encroachments on all Indian lands guaranteed by treaty with the new country. But while Washington believed in the sovereignty of Indian nations and tried hard to prevent outright confiscation, states and individuals alike ignored the federal law in order to satisfy the enormous demand for land dictated by an everincreasing number of immigrants. As the new nation set to work exploring and settling beyond that short-lived Proclamation Line, land was acquired through bloodshed, treaty, crooked deals, or a mix of all three, and the absence of European powers meant that the Indians could not play one colonial interest against another.

The new century saw The Line move west quite a distance. After the Battle of Fallen Timbers in 1794, when General Anthony Wayne crushed Little Turtle's previously invincible Miami Indians, the Ohio Valley was opened to settlers. Around 1803 President Thomas Jefferson decided to relocate all eastern tribes beyond a Permanent Indian Frontier, extending from Minnesota to Louisiana west of the ninety-fifth meridian-a scheme made viable with the Louisiana Purchase that year-to an "Indian Country" of their own, far away from civilization. Reports from the explorations of Lewis and Clark (1804-1806) and Zebulon Pike (1806-1807) portrayed the lands beyond the Mississippi as mostly desert and "incapable of cultivation," unfit for white people. The idea of the "Great American Desert" was reinforced by Major Stephen H. Long's 1823 report, which first used that phrase and characterized the Great Plains as "almost wholly unfit for cultivation and of course uninhabitable by a people depending upon agriculture for their subsistence." Just two years later, in 1825, President James Monroe began forcing tribes west of the Mississippi to this designated Permanent Indian Country.

The movement picked up full steam after the Indian Removal Act of 1830, passed soon after Andrew Jackson became President. The War of 1812 hero had caused an international incident when he had pursued Seminole Indians into Spanish Florida in 1818, and he still thought little of Indian sovereignty, referring to "the farce of treating with Indian tribes." Jackson envisioned a confederacy of formerly southern Indians in the West that would one day take its place in the Union-after they became fully civilized, of course. Some tribes went quietly, but others, chiefly the Seminoles in Florida and the Sauks and Foxes of Illinois, resisted mightily but futilely against the relentless whites. The pressure came from all directions. It mattered not a whit, for example, that the U.S. Supreme Court found the acts of the State of Georgia against the Cherokee nation unconstitutional and in violation of legally binding treaties; Jackson simply refused to support the decision. The forced eviction of the Cherokees from their native Georgia and their march west to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma)-which reduced their population by more than 30 percent-came to be known as the Trail of Tears. They and the rest of the so-called Five Civilized Tribes (the Cherokees, Chickasaws, Choctaws, Creeks, and Seminoles) lost all their land throughout the South and ended up on reservations in Indian Territory, as did many other vanquished tribes.

"Indian Country" had been officially defined by the Indian Intercourse Act of 1834 as "all that part of the United States west of the Mississippi; and not within the states of Missouri and Louisiana, or the territory of Arkansas." Congress decreed that white men were forbidden to travel beyond The Line without a license (though this and similar provisions in subsequent treaties were rarely, if ever, enforced), and a line of forts was constructed to prevent whites from passing to the west and Indians from attacking to the east. In 1835 Jackson promised the Indians that their new lands would be forever "secured and guaranteed to them." By 1840 Indian removal was largely complete.

Shortly thereafter, several nearly simultaneous events combined dramatically to change the situation. The first wagon train carrying white emigrants reached the Platte River in modern-day Nebraska in 1841, along what later became known as the Oregon Trail. Many more followed, straight through the heart of the Lakotas' favorite hunting grounds. These first migrants over the Great Plains were greeted with more curiosity than hostility. The Indians allowed them through and traded with them for goods that the tribes quickly became dependent on; the Indians sometimes even guided and aided the migrants. Until the mid-1840s, there was only one reported death involving the overland migrants, and that was an Indian. But the number of annual emigrants rapidly increased more than tenfold, from 5,000 in 1845 to 55,000 in 1850. The wagon trains, and the settlers and miners they carried, drove away the buffalo and depleted the wood and grass along the way. The constant stream of invading whites also spread epidemic diseases such as cholera, smallpox, measles, and venereal diseases to the Indians, who had developed no immunity to these illnesses. Some tribes, particularly the Cheyennes and the friendly Mandans and Arikaras along the Missouri River, were decimated. The epidemics were viewed by some Plains Indians as the white man's black magic, and in response, depredations against the invaders began to occur more frequently

(Continues...)




Excerpted from A Terrible Glory by James Donovan Copyright © 2008 by James Donovan. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Author's Notes     xi
Prologue: A Good Day to Die     3
Approach
The Divine Injunction     9
"The Boy General of the Golden Lock"     38
Patriots     69
Outside the States     86
Belknap's Anaconda     101
"Submitt to Uncl Sam or Kill the 7 Hors"     116
Advance
"The Hide and Seek for Sitting Bull"     139
The Fruits of Insubordination     156
The Seventh Rides Out     172
The Trail to the Greasy Grass     185
On the Jump     200
Attack
The Charge     225
"The Savior of the Seventh"     250
Soldiers Falling     261
The Hill     279
"Death Was All Around Us"     285
The Rescue     300
Aftermath
"All the World Has Gone"     317
The Lost Captain     344
For the Honor of the Regiment     359
Ghosts Dancing     383
Acknowledgments     399
Notes     403
Bibliography     487
Index     513
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 43 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 5, 2008

    It's hard to be neutral about Custer and the Indian Wars,

    and I'm not. Uniquely for a battlefield, at Little Big Horn stones mark the places where soldiers were found after the battle. One can stand on the terrain, among the stones, and even with little knowldge of tactics and firefights see how the battle around Custer played out. Custer lost control of the battle and his units were destroyed piecemeal. Donovan captures the disasterous mess and the afterword, and provides a good, though short, version of the 150-odd years of prologue. He does not, however, draw the unremarkable though obvious conclusions inherent in his story: Custer's and the 7th Cav's failures were due to more than hubris. Custer's experience in the mass battles of the Civil War, with virtually unlimited resources, high-quality troops, and abundant adjacent support had little application to a non-traditional foe when he had fewer resources, needed to be more self-sufficient in the field, and had lower-quality troops. He was a general in the Civil War at the age of a modern lieutenant, learned his lessons young, and didn't adapt to remarkably different circumstances. Donovan's book would be of interest not only to Old West and cavalry fans, but also to historians and strategists who would like additional chapters in the story of the US military adapting, or failing to adapt, to unconventional warfare with peoples who are just not going to adapt to American ways. Same story, different century. Unsurprisingly, these lessons were also lost on the Army at the time, and an organizational and national failure was laid on an individual. Lastly, Donovan does a fine job providing the Indian's perspective, from the sorry history of broken treaties and outright fraud, through the battle and the aftermath.

    8 out of 9 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted December 17, 2009

    Very well done

    Another very good book that has came out in the last 10 years or so that deal with the facts and cuts through all the garbage that the US Army have thrown down since the battle. This book also helps put to rest the one sided propaganda crap that really started with the movie Little Big Man. (Good entertaining movie but its fiction and I am amazed how many people actually think this movie is a true story it is laughable) I would also like to add about the archelogical digs that fox did. First of all he used Indian testimony that there was no last stand and I have read countless books on the subject and for every Indian testimony he gives that it was a short battle I can show you 10 Indians testimonials that say just the opposite. For not finding more shell casings on last stand hill he forgot to mention up into the 1960's it was legal for people to walk the battlefiel and pick up shell casings and people did. There also has been other research of the area and these people have said themselves they have picked up shell casings. He also failed to mention there has been a road that has been put in and a monument. Most of the major Indian players from Sitting Bull on down have talked about how the soldiers put up a brave fight on Last Stand Hill. When Terry arrived they also found there was a breast work of around 40 horses killed that the soldiers layed behind to fire but this fact has seemed to be covered up over the years. the Army and especially Beenteen and Reno had to make it seem like a route to cover up their cowardice and indifference. The new evidence also points out that there was close to 200 Indians that died fighting custer which points to a hard fight. The army also made the Indian camp larger than it was they would like us to believe they were 4000 warriors Beenteen in one of his many lies even said 9000 at one time but there was 1500 warriors with the the possibility of maybe 2000 which was exactly what the Army believed they would find all along.custer had his faults but what History has done to his memory and how it has portrayed him is criminal. Beenteen and Reno are the two history should villafy and then guys like Grant, Terry and Sherman should receive their fair share of the blame for covering up. If you like to read some other good books the best one might be To Hell with Honor by Larry Skelnar.

    4 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted July 26, 2009

    I Also Recommend:

    This book tells the whole story in minute detail

    If you are interested in the history of the US west after the civil war, this book provides incredible detail. You may find the beginning somewhat slow as the backgrounds are developed, but if you really want to understand the actions of the players during this period the detail is essential. It makes it much easier to understand the interactions of Washington DC, the US Army, civilians and the native Americans.

    4 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted June 10, 2009

    Custer's Defence

    George Armstrong Custer certainly had his personal faults, including self promotion and a huge ego. However, the writer makes a good case that the Battle of the Little Bighorn and the subsequent destruction of the Seventh Cavalry should not be blamed on his shortcomings. Rather, many mistakes by a number of partiscipants contributed to this tragic event. The book also provides some interesting insights into the post Civil War lives of President Grant, General Sherman, Sitting Bull,Crazy Horse and, of course, Custer.

    4 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted December 25, 2008

    more from this reviewer

    Good But Not The Final Word

    This is a solid, well-written account of the Little Big Horn. The author sheds light on some aspects of the battle and aftermath that were new to me. However, I think he underplayed some of the archeological work done by the Fox-Scott team in the 1980s that suggests that the Custer battalion disintegrated under fire and his account of the Last Stand seems unconvincing in that light. I still feel that Evan S. Connell's Son of the Morning Star is the best, most original book written about the battle and Custer. Stephen Ambrose's Crazy Horse and Custer is a good dual biography of both men and Gregory Urwin's Custer Victorious demonstrates why Custer had such a high reputation in the post Civil War Army.

    3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 29, 2008

    SERVED IN CUSTER'S OUTFIT

    I've been fascinated by Little Bighorn since 1968, when I served in the 7th Infantry [Custer's old Seventh Cavalry]in Vietnam. Serving with me was Gary Medicine Bird, grandson of Kills-At-Night, a Cheyenne warrior who fought in this battle, who is mentioned in the book 'Son of the Morning Star,' and who lived to be over 100 years old. Old enough to tell his grandson firsthand about the events of that day.--Tom Reilly

    3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted April 17, 2010

    A very interesting book.

    I have been to Custer National Park and after reading this interesting account will be making plans to return. The author takes a story that is very well known, and through very thorough research brings to light new and interesting conclusions of what probably happened on a long ago time in the untamed wilds of our very young country. I found myself unable to put the book down after believing that I knew the story of what transpired leading up to the battle of the Little Big Horn. But with the conclusions drawn and the information provided there is a deeper insight into the motives and emotions of those involved. During my reading I found myself with feelings and emotional ties to the main participants that surprised and delighted me. Be prepared for an unexpected thrilling ride to the conclusion!

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 1, 2009

    Fair and Interesting Take on Custer and the Little Big Horn

    I found A Terrible Glory to be a fair and balanced portrayl of Custer, and based on extensive research. The book was neither a tired attempt to glorify Custer and gloss over his shortcomings and mistakes (there were several), nor another book devoted to laying the blame for the Little Big Horn disaster solely at Custer's feet. Rather, the author explained how the result of the battle also was the product of the mistakes and cowardice of the other officers, the soldiers' gross underestimation of the strength and skill of the Indian warriors, and the poor organization and training of the soldiers, including the officers, who accompanied Custer. I also enjoyed the author's inclusion of a human element by explaining the strengths and weaknesses of the players in the story, as well as the effect of the Little Big Horn on those who survived or were left behind (Mrs. Custer, for example). Overall, I found the book to be an easy read that should appeal to those, like me, who had little knowledge of the Little Big Horn or Custer, and Custer or Little Big Horn buffs looking for a fresh take.

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 30, 2008

    Once again the Indian side is not covered

    Custer split his command and stopped upon the ridge above the indian encampment to watch the other column charge toward the indians.This was reported by the surviving indians after the battle but, was ignored. Custed planned on cutting the escape off after the indians were run out of the village. He would not beleve his scouts that the encampment was that large,plus he was a glory seeker. After watching the attempted charge fail he realized his mistake and with indians charging from the revine was in no position to attack,retreat or run.Although there were attempts to run. They did the only thing left: dismount and die.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 24, 2008

    A non fiction book that reads like a novel

    I'm not a Custerophile as others who rated this book seem to be. In fact, about all I knew about the man was that he was defeated at Little Bighorn by Sitting Bull and the Sioux tribe. I have, however stopped by the battlefield on a number of occasions whilst driving from Washington to Colorado and always found it to be a fascinating place. That having been said, I could not put this book down. I'm sure, as others are wont to point out, there might be a few factual errors in this book but I certainly didn't care. I read on with reckless abandon. I would highly recommend this book to anyone.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 5, 2008

    Brilliantly written¿

    The Indians assisted settlers, teaching them how to raise crops and even sharing their food with them. In return, the white man looked on the Indians as savages and treated them like animals. The American government, on more than one occasion, cheated the Indians. Eventually, the Indians fought back. Custer¿s reputation grew as an Indian fighter. A Terrible Glory is a history buff¿s dream come true. James Donovan carefully researched the Battle of Little Bighorn. He considered recent findings. While we can never be certain what happened June 25, 1876, we can speculate. A Terrible Glory is written brilliantly. This book is hard to put down. There are over 500 pages, and yet the book is mesmerizing to the end. The photographs add much to the text. They make this tiny bit of history come alive. Donovan aptly describes the battle and aftermath. ¿There were skulls to crush, eyes to tear out, muscle and tendons to sever, limbs to hack off, and heads to separate from bodies.¿ A Terrible Glory will fascinate many. History buffs should rush out and get their copy today.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 11, 2008

    No victory for either side

    Good book - a little confusing when explaining the Terry,Gibbon,Cook marches to find the hostiles. Some stuff is new, but like the titanic, history can't be rewritten. Somewhat slow beginning but then it takes off and shows the confusion of battle. The aftermath was the sad part of the book - no one won in this scenario. Custer was dead, Reno / Benteen and the rest of the officers chose to protect the honor of the regiment. Libbie suffered and the indians never got what the originally wanted - to be left alone.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 10, 2008

    Donovan on Custer

    A candid, objective, and refreshing look at the mystery of June 25, 1876, a blazing-hot day of thirst, terror, and tragedy for Custer and 220 troopers of his beloved Seventh Cavalry. A must for every Custer fan!

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 15, 2012

    A Terrible Glory was fantastically written. My previous impressi

    A Terrible Glory was fantastically written. My previous impression on the Battle of Little Bighorn was changed drastically. Having Custer taking the majority of the blame for the masacre (as most people would understand it) is simply unjust. This book is a great read. You get a more compelling sense in what actually happened at the Little Bighorn.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted October 14, 2011

    Worth reading

    This was a great book, i read it cover to cover in day. I would read it again, its that good.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 12, 2011

    De4we8

    A pompous politician/general who thought himself invincible and his command paid the ultimate price, as did the plains tribes he tried to subjugate

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted March 15, 2011

    A Terrible Glory

    I just recently got interested in the civil war era and found this book to be very good. It dragged a bit in certain parts, but James Donovan really paints a vivid picture of Little Bighorn and the men who were there.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 2, 2008

    very disapointed

    i would like to say that the real victim in that battle was the native americans and i would hope that anyone who really wants to see the truth of all those battles of the west with the natvie americans will also read bury my heart at wounded knee.

    0 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 17, 2008

    A good read that has a significant error.

    I enjoyed the book but it seems to jump around a bit. It also has a significant error on page 276 where the author writes that Custer was first shot in the right breast and then the right temple. These injuries occurred on the left side, and the author himself notes that later on page 308 when describing the fatal wounds.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 20, 2008

    Not perfect, but close!

    Simply put, this is a very, very good book. I thoroughly enjoyed how Donovan brought the players to life - many with a detailed story of their early life until their death. On one hand Donovan does a great job of describing the organization of the post -Civil War army, its politics, its training, its leaders and its strategy. On the other hand I was a bit disappointed in the description of the battles (Rosebud and Little Big Horn). At some points the descriptions could be vivid at others the description could be abrupt. While it was not hard to see parallels in the army¿s efforts to quell the insurgency and track down it leaders (some of whom used another country for safe haven) with our efforts today in the Middle East, I was never quite sure whether Donovan was a fan of Custer or not. Clearly he was no fan of Reno, and to a certain extent, Benteen, but I suppose my question implies that Donovan did a fine job in sticking to the facts and not letting any personal bias surface. Recommended without reservations.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 43 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)