Everything Belongs to the Future

Everything Belongs to the Future

by Laurie Penny


$12.55 $12.99 Save 3% Current price is $12.55, Original price is $12.99. You Save 3%.
View All Available Formats & Editions
Choose Expedited Shipping at checkout for guaranteed delivery by Friday, January 31
19 New & Used Starting at $1.99


Everything Belongs to the Future is a bloody-minded tale of time, betrayal, desperation, and hope that could only have been told by the inimitable Laurie Penny.

Time is a weapon wielded by the rich, who have excess of it, against the rest, who must trade every breath of it against the promise of another day's food and shelter. What kind of world have we made, where human beings can live centuries if only they can afford the fix? What kind of creatures have we become? The same as we always were, but keener.

In the ancient heart of Oxford University, the ultra-rich celebrate their vastly extended lifespans. But a few surprises are in store for them. From Nina and Alex, Margo and Fidget, scruffy anarchists sharing living space with an ever-shifting cast of crusty punks and lost kids. And also from the scientist who invented the longevity treatment in the first place.

"The scariest, most enduring dystopias walk a fine line between parable and prediction. Penny erases that line. In this made-up story, the rich speciate from the poor; in our real world, working class lifespans are declining as the one percent live ever longer lives at ever-greater removes from the rest of us. This is no mere literary device. This is a pitiless allegory, calculated to enrage and terrify its readers." — Cory Doctorow

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780765388285
Publisher: Tom Doherty Associates
Publication date: 10/18/2016
Pages: 128
Sales rank: 790,880
Product dimensions: 7.80(w) x 4.90(h) x 0.20(d)

About the Author

Laurie Penny is a contributing editor and columnist for the New Statesman and a frequent writer on social justice, pop culture, gender issues, and digital politics for the Guardian, the New Inquiry, Salon, the Nation, Vice, the New York Times, and many other publications. Her blog Penny Red was shortlisted for the Orwell Prize in 2010. In 2012, Britain’s Tatler magazine described her as one of the top “100 people who matter.” Her nonfiction book Unspeakable Things: Sex, Lies, and Revolution was published by Bloomsbury (2014).


Barnes & Noble Review Interview with Laurie Penny

If the British journalist and author Laurie Penny is known for one thing, it's her astute, incisive, and often provocative writings on politics and society. She's the author of several works of nonfiction that explore questions of class, gender, and sexuality, and the numerous ways in which they intersect. In works like 2014's Unspeakable Things: Sex, Lies, and Revolution, Penny's engagement with culture, her refusal to have her views easily categorized, and her awareness of history make her work an essential guide to some of the most vital and contentious issues of our time.

Everything Belongs to the Future represents something of a shift for Penny. For one thing, it's fiction. Science fiction, even, set late in the twenty-first century, decades after a scientific discovery allows for the human lifespan to be dramatically extended — at least for those wealthy enough to afford the treatment. In this short novel, Penny explores the array of ways in which this single innovation might transform the world, from a shift in perception of the arts to a change in how global warming is addressed. Her story turns on a small group of characters who are haunted by the way that income inequality has extended to lifespan inequality, and vow to do something about it.

I talked with Penny via email about the genesis of her novel, the way that writing fiction has affected her nonfiction, and how to invent a future that reflects and comments on social disparities without falling into a number of dystopian clichés. The following is an edited transcript of our conversation. —Tobias Carroll

The Barnes & Noble Review: Everything Belongs to the Future shares a number of concerns with your works of nonfiction. Have you been writing fiction alongside your work on politics and society all along, or was there something specific that prompted you to expand your focus?

Laurie Penny: I've always written fiction in bits and pieces but only started to take it seriously and show it to other people three years ago. We had a death in the family, and I found myself unable to write about the news, which is my bread and butter — but for my sanity, I still needed to write. Then I honed my technique at the Clarion West workshop in 2015. I've always been a critically conscious reader, so it's a struggle to get out of my own way and not analyze every aspect of every story for its political fitness. Human stories are always more complicated and problematic, and that awareness has fed back into my journalism.

BNR: Is there a specific way that you've found that writing fiction has changed your nonfiction?

LP: Oh, a huge amount — I find myself thinking a great deal about how to represent different voices, in a literal rather than metaphorical sense. Nonfiction is all about developing your own voice. Fiction is ventriloquism.

BNR: Did you find that the experience of working on this novella was relatively similar to the nonfiction work you've done, or did it take you to markedly different places as a writer?

LP: Fiction still flows far less easily for me than nonfiction. This story went through about ten rewrites, and I fussed and fretted with it a lot as I expanded it to novella length. Honestly, I've stared at it so long that I have no idea anymore if it's even any good. I'll leave that to readers to decide.

BNR: The idea of a drug that allows the wealthy and powerful to stop aging is at the center of this novella. What prompted the decision to put that at the heart of the future in which this story is set?

LP: I've a good friend who's a researcher in this area who challenged me years ago to write a story about the social implications of anti-ageing tech, so I've been cooking the idea for a while. Then I took a course in the history and consequences of biotechnology, which gave me a zillion terrifying story ideas — that's why science fiction is such a vital part of political discourse. It's where we sketch out future scenarios and try to figure out coping strategies.

BNR: The world building of the novella has a number of interesting complexities—social stratification has become even more heightened, but climate change has become more of an active societal concern, and the economic position of artists has been improved. What was your process for fleshing out this future society?

LP: I'm very interested in fictional futures that don't involve total social collapse- futures that may be grim, but aren't actively dystopian. Dystopia is too easy.

Anti-ageing opens up a whole world of possibility in terms of world building — after all, if people with great wealth can suddenly see themselves living for centuries, there's a new incentive to stop mining the future for profit and actually take care of the planet. This is a world where climate change has been slowed but not stopped. Britain, with its temperate climate, has not been drastically affected, but there have been true disasters elsewhere. And Oxford was a perfect place to set it — I write a lot about London, where I was born and live, but I studied at Oxford for three years, and it's a bizarre, twisted cultural microclimate where time really does seem to move differently — perfect for a story that is fundamentally about time and privilege.

There are all sorts of Easter eggs in there for anyone who's from Oxford: Hasan's food truck is a real thing, as is HiLos, a rum bar where I used to work. The breaking-into-Magdalen-Ball scene is straight-up lifted from a stunt I tried to pull with some friends in second year, although we got caught.

BNR: In your novella, a mold found in Scotland is at the center of the drug that can extend human lifespans. Were you looking towards any real-world science for inspiration here?

LP: Oh, no. It's totally made-up hand waving magic science, which is going to annoy my actual science friends no end- apart from a very, very veiled nod towards the issue of biological prospecting. But I was a little bit pleased with the idea that in a hundred years we're bioprospecting in the Republic of Scotland.

BNR: How much world building and extrapolation of future history did you do that didn't end up making its way into the finished book?

LP: Huge amounts. I had a lot in there about What Happened to California, where one of the characters come from — it's become a little in-joke in a lot of my fiction that whenever I world-build, I destroy San Francisco offstage. There was also a great deal of waffling about what life extension technology would do to the Piketty equation that only made it into a few lines.

BNR: There are a number of critiques of privilege that are subtly worked into the narrative, in terms of race, gender, and class. Were those there from the beginning, or was the adding of that layer something that came as you edited and revised?

LP: Subtle? That's a compliment. I thought I laid it on with a trowel. The most important thing here is that the central love story — if you can call it a love story, given that it features an undercover cop who's using his activist girlfriend for information — is based on cases that really happened in the UK, where police were given fake identities and encouraged to form deceptive relationships with left-wing women, sometimes even having children with them. I wanted to be sensitive and upfront in how I handled that. The inquiry into those abuses — and they are abuses, make no mistake — is still ongoing. My first readers told me I was too mean to the cop, and some of them were anarchists with no love for the police. It's partly about how privilege and state power interact with our ability to form relationships, and partly about how some men justify awful behavior in the name of love, but writing it from the point of view of a cop was a real humanizing challenge.

BNR: Early in the book, there's a party inspired by what the narration calls "a weird old racist novel" that, from the description, sounds a lot like H. Rider Haggard's She. Were there any other works of fiction about immortality that you were either influenced by or wanted to critique with Everything Belongs to the Future?

LP: Yes, that's the one ! I've always been interested in the portrayals of immortality in Gulliver's Travels, but I'm also a big reader of vampire stories, which are the main popular delivery vehicle for ideas about extended life and its costs right now. It's fascinating how vampires, who are essentially unsubtle stand-ins for unscrupulous aristocrats, have become totally rehabilitated in popular culture. Everyone wants to be a vampire, or be seduced by one, and we've almost forgotten that they're supposed to be horrible monsters. Sure, they kill a lot of people, but it's worth it if you get to be rich and sexy forever. right?

—October 5, 2016

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews