Mercy Kill (Mercy Gunderson Series #2)

Mercy Kill (Mercy Gunderson Series #2)

by Lori Armstrong

NOOK Book(eBook)

View All Available Formats & Editions

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781416597070
Publisher: Touchstone
Publication date: 01/11/2011
Series: Mercy Gunderson Series , #2
Format: NOOK Book
Pages: 320
Sales rank: 155,429
File size: 4 MB

About the Author

Lori Armstrong is the two-time winner of the Shamus Award given by the Private Eye Writers of America and a New York Times bestselling author of romantic fiction, written as Lorelei James. Her books have won the Willa Cather Literary Award and have been nominated for the High Plains Book Award and the Daphne du Maurier Award. She lives in western South Dakota. Visit her website at

Reading Group Guide

This reading group guide for Mercy Kill includes discussion questions, ideas for enhancing your book club, and a Q&A with author Lori Armstrong. The suggested questions are intended to help your reading group find new and interesting angles and topics for your discussion. We hope that these ideas will enrich your conversation and increase your enjoyment of the book.


  1. In the first scene of the book, Mercy is faced with a decision of whether or not to kill a sick female mountain lion that she spots during target practice. Ultimately, she chooses not to kill the animal. What does this decision tell you about Mercy? Why do you think the author decide to open the book with this scene?
  2. When Mercy is discussing her drinking with Rollie early on in the story, she refers to herself as “just another drunk Indian.” Were you surprised that Mercy thinks of herself in this way? What does Mercy’s comment indicate to the reader about her personality and the way that she views herself?
  3. Mercy does not like Kit McIntyre, but admits that since he spends so much money at Clementine’s, she can find a way to disregard her personal issues and make nice with him. Does this decision seem out of character for Mercy? Why or why not?
  4. Given how close they were and the fact that he had saved her life in the past, were you surprised by Mercy’s reaction upon finding J-Hawk’s body? Do you think that the way she reacts is a reflection of tough character and/or the influence of her Army background, or do you think that she is still in shock at this point in the novel?
  5. When Mercy is talking to John-John about her relationship with Dawson, she comments that she has a hard time “separating the man he is from the job he does.” Could the same thing be said about Mercy and how she views herself and her profession? Do you think that Mercy recognizes her similarities with Dawson or not?
  6. Do you think that Mercy compares herself to Anna? Does she compete with her or embrace the similarities between them?
  7. Despite the fact that she is the former sheriff’s daughter and her background in the Army, Mercy is not flattered when Kiki and Geneva approach her to run for sheriff. Why do you think that Mercy is reluctant to run when she is such a strong and qualified candidate for the job?
  8. Is Mercy’s disappointment with Dawson’s police investigation into J-Hawk’s murder a reflection of her trust issues or a reflection of his capability as sheriff? Why doesn’t Mercy trust him to do his job even though she trusts him in other aspects of their relationship?
  9. Cherelle is a very interesting character in that her “flaws” allow the reader to discover a great deal about the surrounding characters, namely Mercy and Anna. How do Mercy and Anna relate to Cherelle? Can you relate to Cherelle at all and if so, how?
  10. Since Mercy is a strong woman who would not tolerate abuse like the kind that Cherelle suffers at the hands of Victor and Saro, what do you think explains Mercy’s reaction to Cherelle’s situation? Does Mercy have sympathy for her and her abusive home-life?
  11. During Mercy’s interaction with Saro and Victor in Stillwell’s, it seems imperative to Mercy that she not be intimidated or back down from the situation. Do you think that this was more important to her personally or do you think that she just didn’t want to look weak in front of friends, acquaintances and voters?
  12. Why do you think the author chose to have Mercy actually take the final shots and kill Anna? What does Anna’s death symbolize? Do you see symmetry between this climactic scene and the opening scene when Mercy declines to shoot an injured mountain lion?
  13. By the end of the book, do you think that Mercy has changed, or do you think that she remains essentially the same person as she was at the beginning of the book?

  1. Read a brief article or essay about the history of the Native American reservations in the Dakotas prior to the book discussion. Several of the main characters are from the Lakota tribe, and reading about their culture in particular will provide better insight into the story. Here are some suggested articles and web sites:

  2. Discuss whether or not you have ever known any family or friends who have been part of ‘elite’ branches of the military (Special Forces, Green Berets, Navy Seals, etc.). If so, and if you’re comfortable talking about it, please explain what that experience was like for you and for your friends and/or family.
  3. Since much of the book revolves around nature and the outdoor elements, hold one of your discussions in a local park or, if possible, a nature reserve. This will give you unique insight as to how nature affects Lori Armstrong and her main character Mercy. Consider your relationship with nature and how it affects your day-to-day life.
  4. Learn about the author, Lori Armstrong by visiting her site here: and on the Simon & Schuster author page here:


This is your second time writing about Mercy Gunderson. Now that you’ve spent more time with Mercy, in what ways do you relate to her?

It’s always a challenge, writing the second book in a series, because I know more about Mercy now than when I started, but in most cases her actions on the page surprise even me. I relate to her in that we both have a low tolerance for b.s., and she and I have the same taste in music.

In what ways do you not relate to her?

Mercy’s tendency to drown her troubles in alcohol is something I don’t relate to at all. Nor do I understand her inability to ask for help. But those types of characters fascinate me just for that reason, because we are so different.

Are any of the characters in the book based on people that you know?

No. I’m a self-admitted people watcher, so I’m constantly observing interactions and mannerisms and physical characteristics. And I will use pieces of what I’ve seen, be it hair or eye color, or a funky mannerism, or a certain way a person speaks or walks, or interacts with others. I’ve leaned a lot about human nature just by watching and listening. But I’ve never based any fictional character on anyone I know personally.

You address many social and racial issues surrounding the Native American culture in America in this book. Why did you choose to incorporate such themes in your writing?

Because it’s such a huge part of our life in western South Dakota and to gloss over it would be a disservice to not only to all the people of my state, but to people who’ve never been to South Dakota, who only know about historical Indian “issues” from what they’ve read in textbooks, detailing things that happened more than 100+ years ago. I get asked a lot on book tours if I know any “real, live” Indians, and I honestly have to stop and think about what that means, because I think some people still think of western South Dakota as the untamed Wild West, where Indians ride horses, wearing elaborate headdresses, live in tipis and hunt buffalo. Although many Native Americans never stopped celebrating their culture, religion and traditions after being relegated to reservations, many hid their practice, or denied their heritage, in some cases—like Mercy—she knows little of her Indian heritage because her mother didn’t deem it important.

You live in South Dakota and have expressed in various interviews that you really wanted the setting of South Dakota to come through in your writing. Why did you choose to set Mercy’s story in South Dakota?

I never considered setting the book anyplace else, and that’s not just because the research is easy, since it’s right outside my door. I’m a South Dakota girl and even if readers don’t see the beauty in the area the same way I do, I think it’s obvious I love where I live, and hopefully that’s what gives the books the authenticity I’m striving for.

Many of the male characters in Mercy’s life are kind, thoughtful and gentle (John-John, Jake, and Rollie) turning typical gender roles on their heads. Did you intend for these characters to serve as foils for Mercy?

Yes, and no. Mercy is a tough as nails character, and it’s been a challenge to keep her from becoming a caricature. The loner who doesn’t need anyone, which always seems sadder, somehow, when it’s a female character. I didn’t intentionally set out to ground her with men who might be seen as soft, but I wanted her to interact with men she’d had history with, the best friend, the former lover, the father figure, all men who knew her and loved her in some form, before she became so hard and tough. All these men remind her of who she’s been—as well as who she can become.

What’s next for Mercy Gunderson?

I’m working on the third book, titled DARK MERCY, which will send Mercy in a new direction.

If MERCY KILL was made into a movie, who would play Mercy?

I get this question frequently, so you’d think I’d have an answer…but I really don’t. I can tell you physically what Mercy looks like, but I hear her more than see her. On a purely gratuitous note, I’d love to see North Dakota native Josh Duhamel play Dawson.

Who are your favorite authors to read, mystery or otherwise?

I read widely across many genres, but my must have mystery/thriller authors are JD Robb, Robert Crais, CJ Box.

Whose writing, if anyone’s, would you say has had an influence on your own style?

Sue Grafton, Stephen King, Carolyn Keene and Laura Ingalls Wilder are the biggest influences, which is a pretty eclectic list! But whenever I think of books that’ve had the biggest long term impact, it’s always the first book I read from those authors that have stuck with me.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

Mercy Kill 3.7 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 15 reviews.
harstan More than 1 year ago
Late at night in South Dakota, former army sniper Mercy Gunderson steps outside of Clementine's bar where she works only to find the corpse of Major Jason "J-Hawk" Hawley. J-Hawk, who saved Mercy's life in Indonesia, was shot and stabbed. Mercy's boyfriend Eagle River County Sheriff Mason Dawson seems to perform a perfunctory investigation. Mercy decides she owes her buddy so she begins making inquiries. She uses J-Hawk's job as a spokesperson for Titan Oil on their controversial pipeline project as the starting point. However, Mercy begins to uncover some nasty stuff about her late hero that makes her wonder if she even knew J-Hawk. At the same time, FBI Indian County Special Crimes Unit Agent Shay Turnbull also investigates the homicide and the ties to Titan Oil. The sequel to No Mercy is a super whodunit as the former soldier refuses to believe the evidence that her hero did not live up to the image she has of him. The story line is fast-paced especially when the subplot focuses in the present. The speed decelerates somewhat when the story line concentrates on Mercy's military past; although that also enhances understanding of the heroine's motives and feelings with "the statue on the pedestal comes crumbling to the ground" (Blessed is the Rain by Brooklyn Bridge). Harriet Klausner
Anonymous 8 months ago
When a book is released on audio, files the author listen to it? I just spent many hours listening to Mercy Kill, and it wasn't good. Every character us read as if they are angry all of the time. It was hard to like anybody, especially Mercy.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I enjoyed the first book thoroughly, enjoyed meeting the characters and seeing Mercy's challenges in her transition to a civilian life, but in this book...Mercy not suspecting that [redacted name] had killed [other redacted name] just makes her look stupid. Granted, she's really not a great investigator, but there wasn't just evidence, there were blinking, bright signs throughout. I liked a lot of parts throughout this book, but Mercy's blindness was annoying. Much as with Julie Collins, the beginning was great, but there's just too much deus ex machina for me to enjoy them long past their introductions.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Suspensemag More than 1 year ago
Ex Army sniper, Mercy Gunderson's attempts at easing back into civilian life on her families South Dakota ranch aren't going well. To stay busy she takes on a job at the local bar, but her life gets turned upside down when her old friend and army buddy Jason Hawley comes to town. Hawley is with Titan Oil (a huge Canadian Oil Company) and there to convince the people of Eagle River County that running a pipeline through their ranches is a good idea. Needless to say, the ranchers want no part of Titan Oil or Jason Hawley. When Mercy finds Jason's lifeless body outside the bar one night, no one seems interested in investigating the murder, including the sheriff. Mercy knows she must track down Hawley's killer. But, as she unravels the mystery, she also uncovers a dark side to this South Dakota town. In Armstrong's latest novel, she paints such a descriptive picture that it feels like you are right there in South Dakota with Mercy. The story was strong, intense and gritty and Mercy, along with the other characters, is depicted as hard as the landscape. Armstrong writes a very complex and interwoven storyline that twists and turns where almost everyone has a motive. But, you won't know who did it 'til the very end. It was a wild ride! Reviewed by Catherine Peterson for Suspense Magazine