"A remarkable work of slowed-down journalism...They are doing their jobs as journalists and writing the first draft of history." —Jill Filipovic, The Washington Post
"...Generous but also damning." —Hanna Rosin, The New York Times
From two New York Times reporters, a deeper look at the formative years of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and his confirmation.
In September 2018, the F.B.I. was given only a week to investigate allegations of sexual misconduct against Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump's Supreme Court nominee. But even as Kavanaugh was sworn in to his lifetime position, many questions remained unanswered, leaving millions of Americans unsettled.
During the Senate confirmation hearings that preceded the bureau's brief probe, New York Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly broke critical stories about Kavanaugh's past, including the "Renate Alumni" yearbook story. They were inundated with tips from former classmates, friends, and associates that couldn't be fully investigated before the confirmation process closed. Now, their book fills in the blanks and explores the essential question: Who is Brett Kavanaugh?
The Education of Brett Kavanaugh paints a picture of the prep-school and Ivy-League worlds that formed our newest Supreme Court Justice. By offering commentary from key players from his confirmation process who haven't yet spoken publicly and pursuing lines of inquiry that were left hanging, it will be essential reading for anyone who wants to understand our political system and Kavanaugh's unexpectedly emblematic role in it.
|Publisher:||Penguin Publishing Group|
|Product dimensions:||6.20(w) x 8.50(h) x 1.20(d)|
About the Author
Robin Pogrebin is a reporter on the New York Times's Culture Desk, where she covers the art world and cultural institutionsexploring the internal politics, finances, and governance of museums, auction houses, galleries, and performing arts organizations. She has covered the media for the Business Desk and city news for the Metro Desk. Prior to the Times, she was a reporter at the New York Observer and an associate producer at ABC News for Peter Jennings's documentary unit. She attended Riverdale Country School in New York and graduated from Yale College in 1987.Kate Kelly is a reporter for the New York Times who covers Wall Street. She is also an experienced television broadcaster and the author of Street Fighters, the bestselling account of the bank failure that touched off the financial crisis. Her reporting focuses on big banks, the worlds of trading and lending, and the crucial players setting financial policy both in business and in politics. Prior to the Times, she worked at the New York Observer, the Wall Street Journal, and CNBC. She attended the National Cathedral School in Washington and graduated from Columbia College in 1997.
Read an Excerpt
It was cold for October, with evening temperatures dropping into the forties as alumni poured onto Georgetown Preparatory School’s leafy campus in suburban Maryland for their thirty-fifth-year high school reunion. It had been a tumultuous day for the country. A Florida man had been arrested for sending package bombs to more than a dozen prominent Democrats, including former president Barack Obama and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton. Despite the serious threat, President Donald Trump was focused on the upcoming midterm congressional elections and wanted his party to do the same. The “‘Bomb’ stuff,” as Trump put it in a tweet, risked slowing Republican momentum at a critical time.
On the Georgetown Prep campus, hundreds of former students were gathering in the George Center, a large brick building adjacent to the football stadium where the school store and snack bar were located. Nicknamed “Stag Night” because significant others were not invited, the Friday evening cocktail gathering was the traditional start to Reunion Weekend. There would be welcome speeches from school officials; wisecracks about thickening waists and thinning hair; beer and finger food.
The next day, about four hundred people would gather to watch the school’s football team, the Hoyas, play the homecoming game against Episcopal High School, despite the chilly, wet afternoon. During the years when it was still part of Georgetown University, Prep had at some point dubbed its teams the “Hoyas,” which derived from the Latin cheer “Hoya Saxa!” (translation: “What Rocks!”). After this particular homecoming game— during which the Hoyas trounced their Episcopal High rivals, 24–6— classmates, spouses, and friends would toast over cocktails and trade stories at nearby Pinstripes, a bistro/ bowling- and- bocce venue in North Bethesda.
Brett Kavanaugh typically welcomed these rare opportunities to reconnect and reminisce with old friends. But this year, he had seriously considered opting out. Three weeks had passed since his confirmation as the newest associate justice of the United States Supreme Court, about six since the devastating accusation that almost derailed it. So when he arrived on campus for his reunion, Kavanaugh was steeled for awkward interactions.
At the same time, he appeared resolutely upbeat, in keeping with his often articulated philosophy to “live on the sunrise side of the mountain.”
As a justice on America’s highest court, Kavanaugh now had a security detail that followed him to public places, particularly since, during the confirmation process, his wife had been targeted by vicious emails and his family had received death threats. Many of Kavanaugh’s fellow Georgetown Prep alumni had been supportive. Nearly two hundred had signed a letter endorsing his Supreme Court candidacy when he was nominated. Some had even gone on TV to praise his character. But given the polarizing nature of the hearings, he knew that not everyone stood behind him.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
Horrible. Malicious and defamatory without evidence, only hearsay. Another attempt to discredit someone who's political views differs from the author's views. The left has no shame. The NYT and their reporters are propagandist who simply echo and amplify the garbage of the not so democratic party.
It's basically - I heard this story from a friend of a friends cousin, which is like Wow. Only problem is the so called cousin denies the story. (Not stated until the end) But I guess if your into make believe or a radical conspiracy theorist you would enjoy the non-sense.
False in one, false in all. I bought this book at my local BN. I was going to write a review on AMZN because it gets more traffic, but AMZN has restricted reviews to only people who bought the book from AMZN. Considering that AMZN sells books, that's remarkable. What happened to free speech? At page 94, the authors wrote, "approved Kavanaugh for a place on the U.S. District Court of Appeals on the D.C. Circuit." At page 80, "The judge poured over his opinions from his tenure on the District Court." Dead wrong. Kavanaugh was never a district court judge. A district court is a trial court. Kavanaugh was always an appellate court judge and the name of the court he sat on is The United States Court of Appeals for the Disctrict of Columbia Circuit. Huge difference. Any reasonably educated person or a thorough researcher would get that fact right, but not these two NYT left wing hacks. More mistakes. Early on in the book CBF is described as having a fear of flying. Again, any real reporter would know that this is a lie as her former boyfriend used to go on surf vacations with her. She flew in a small plane from island to island in the Pacific. We are also subjected to the "two front doors" lie. CBF and her husband added a front door as part of a remodel to their house so that their renters would have a separate entrance. It had nothing to do with her alleged fear of closed spaces. Also the time line is all wrong. And how much rent did CBF charge? Did the Fords declare that on their income tax returns? Release their 1040s! And, of course, the biggest lie is the story about how Yale undergrad Brett Kavanaugh allegedly whipped out his junk, allowed a guy to grab it and then had it thrust into the face of a female. The woman has no memory of it. It didn't happen! It is a lie. Use your common sense! I must quote Ammo Grrrll from Power Line on this incident as it is too, too good: "He takes out Mr. Happy and his friend – where? On the OTHER side of the girl? On the other side of HIM? – reaches up or across and somehow deposits the little critter into a woman’s hand. (Go ahead. Get some friends. Try it. I’ll wait…) No women point and laugh, scream or swear at the guy. No young gentlemen say, “Hey, Creep, put that thing away.” Nobody leaves. And nobody remembers 35 years later! Works for me! Haha, I kid. Sorry, NOT CREDIBLE!" The biggest thing about this book is that the Yale party incident was reported in the NYT as if it was a fact. The fact that the alleged victim had no memory of it was left out. In the law that's called an intentional omission of a material fact and it libeled Justice Kavanaugh. I hope one of his friends sees this and the Justice sues. The most interesting thing to me is that these two NYT reporters went on TV and said they included that in their story but an NYT editor cut it out. I bet that the book publisher's lawyers told them to say that. These two women should be run out of town, but the next best thing is suing them and the NYT for defamation. I could understand Justice Kavanugh letting this drop, but there needs to be monetary and professional consequences for these lies or they will never stop.
Seriously bad fiction being hyped as fact...
This was an outstanding deep dive into Kavanaugh. I can't believe how little was known about this person who received a lifetime appointment on the SC. -Former Republican
There is plenty in their reporting that is alternately heartbreaking and rage-inducing ... doesn’t seek clear answers so much as attempt to write the first iteration of this particular historical record ... Living in the minutiae, and maintaining that focus on narrating events rather than opining on or analyzing them, makes this book a remarkable work of slowed-down journalism ... the power in this book is the authors’ effort to use their journalistic tools to set the foundation for the reader to consider these bigger, broader questions. The authors try to wrap it up in a way that feels narrow and humble, not straying too far out of their professional lane. They are doing their jobs as journalists and writing the first draft of history. It is up to you, the book suggests, to get to work on the revision.
Excellent book. Journalistic integrity. People actually committed to finding out what occurred.
Justice on Trial by Hemmingway & Severino a well researched and factual account of the Kavanaugh confirmation process. This new book’s account is not new at all and lacks journalistic accountability...kinda make it up as you need to substantiate the weak premise. Nothing more than expensive toilet paper!