Far fetched.
Secret societies, ancient cover-ups, hidden secrets.....where does the B.S. end and real historical research begine? For anyone who has no real knoledge of biblical history then this may seem a bit interesting. But the more you learn about all the early forms of christianity, all the lost texts the church destroyed after the Nicene council in 325 under Constantine, the more you will see the authors of this book as just a bunch of conspiracy therists full of it. The Cathers were just some Gnostics in France. They had no seccret info on the holy grail. You know why? Becouse the holy grail is a myth. Yea, historicle Jesus( Yeshem) had to of ued many cups in his days. Yea, maybe he had something going on with Mary. Who knows and who cares. A blood line? Maybe, but so what. If you want to get an idea of what the real Jesus was probobly like then read an author who knows what the hell he's writting about.Professor John Crossan will give you a good look at the life a Jewish peasant based on anthropologic and biblical study. Jesus' death was, according to most biblical scholars, a shock to his followers. You need to also have an understanding of Jewish belief about how they viewed the comming messiah. According to some Jewish sects, Essens, who Jesus may or may not have been one, believed that the messiah was comming very soon. The Essens believed, according to the book of Daniel, they had the time accuretly pin-poined.And,to them, the messiah was to be a ruler on earth, in Israel. Hence, "the comming kingdom of god" and not "going to the kingdom of god." That's why Jesus told so many thet they" would not taist death." So, Jesus is killed by the Romans, Deff NOT the Jews. His followers go back to their ancient texts trying to fing anything they can in the scriptures that would explain why the one they believed to be the messiah was killed instead of leading the people of Israel in triumph against Roman tyrany. So, the New testament is loaded with ancient prophesy that originally had nothing to do with Jesus,all of a sudden being attributed to him. Also, read Bart Ehrman's several books. One of the best New testament historians. You'll find out all about the many contradictions in the New test. Then go read James Kugel, a Harverd prof. who will give scholarly theorys on who wrote the old tesat. and why. Also, read Richard Friedman: who wrote the Bible? and Israel Finkelstein & Neil Asher Silberman: The Bible unearthed. You'll see how the idea of the Jewish messiah came about, learn of Documentary Hypothesis: the 4 authors of the Torah and what eara they may have been writen in. To sum it all up, the more you know of REAL hostorical and biblical scholarly reasurch, by highly educated reasurchurs with backgrounds in biblical studies, ancient eastern societies, archeology, ancient semetic language....ect, the more the authors of The Holy Blood Holy grail seem like they are way, WAY out of their league, and all the subject matter pointless when you have a firm understanding of the foundation( Old Test) upon which they base their "conspiracy theorys'. All they can do is speculate. To be true, most educated reasurchers speculate. But their's are far more intelligent. This book contains nothing but useless, speculative noncense. Now, please excuse the quality of my spelling. Believe me, I already know how bad it is.
0 out of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.