Ike: An American Hero

( 22 )

Overview

A big, ambitious, and enthralling new biography of Dwight D. Eisenhower, full of fascinating details and anecdotes, which places particular emphasis on his brilliant generalship and leadership in World War Two, and provides, with the advantage of hindsight, a far more acute analysis of his character and personality than any that has previously been available, reaching the conclusion that he was perhaps America's greatest general and one of ...
See more details below
Paperback (Reprint)
$12.61
BN.com price
(Save 29%)$17.99 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (36) from $1.99   
  • New (12) from $8.95   
  • Used (24) from $1.99   
Ike: An American Hero

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK Study
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$1.99
BN.com price

Overview

A big, ambitious, and enthralling new biography of Dwight D. Eisenhower, full of fascinating details and anecdotes, which places particular emphasis on his brilliant generalship and leadership in World War Two, and provides, with the advantage of hindsight, a far more acute analysis of his character and personality than any that has previously been available, reaching the conclusion that he was perhaps America's greatest general and one of America's best presidents, a man who won the war and thereafter kept the peace.

Ike starts with the story of D-Day, the most critical moment in America's history. It was Hitler's last chance to win the war - he had the means to destroy the troops on the beaches, but he failed to react quickly enough. The one man who would have reacted quickly and decisively had he been on the spot, Field Marshal Erwin Rommel, was home on leave and didn't arrive back at his headquarters until it was too late. It was Ike's plan, Ike's decision, Ike's responsibility. He alone, among all the Allied generals, could win or lose the war in one day, and knew it.

But of course there is more to this book than military history. It is a full biography of a remarkable man, ambitious, a late starter, a brilliant leader of men and perhaps the only American general who could command such a difficult coalition, and win the respect of not only his own soldiers, but also those of Great Britain and France, and lead them to a triumphant victory.

It is also the story of a remarkable family. Ike grew up in Abilene, Kansas, and the Eisenhowers were Mennonites, who, like the Amish, were deeply committed pacifists, so it is ironic that he went to West Point and became a general, to his mother's horror. It is as well the portrait of a tumultuous and often difficult marriage, for Mamie was every bit as stubborn and forceful as her husband, and it was by no means the sunny, happy marriage that Republican publicists presented to the public when Ike made his first moves towards the presidency.

Indeed, behind Ike's big grin and the easy-going, affable personality he liked to project was a very different man, fiercely ambitious, hot-tempered, shrewd, and tightly wound. He was a perfectionist for whom duty always came first, and a man of immense ability. In 1941 he was a soldier who was still an unknown and recently promoted colonel, and just two years later he was a four-star general who had commanded the biggest and most successful amphibious operation in history - TORCH, the Anglo-American invasion of North Africa. He commanded respect and was dealt as an equal with such world figures as President Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Charles De Gaulle.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble
The length of Michael Korda's 800-page biography of Dwight David Eisenhower is fully justified. Its subject, the man beloved universally as Ike, was not only the supreme commander of Allied forces in World War II; he was a two-term U.S. president at a critical time in the postwar period. Korda, the author of the acclaimed Ulysses S. Grant, devotes most of this openly sympathetic bio to Eisenhower's long and distinguished military career. With unforgettable anecdotes, he renders the mild-mannered general's uncanny ability to balance and neutralize egotistical, willful Allied leaders including Churchill, Patton, Montgomery, and De Gaulle. The first full-length Eisenhower biography in years.
John Whiteclay Chambers II
Based on comparatively few, although excellent, published sources, this book is not an addition to scholarship. But it is a fresh and engaging characterization. It is enhanced by the author's clear sympathy for his subject, international perspective and charming, urbane style.
—The Washington Post
Publishers Weekly

Characterizing Dwight Eisenhower as an American with a "big grin" and "long-limbed, loose American way of walking," this smitten biography demonstrates his heroism by dwelling on his World War II record as commander of Allied armies in Europe. Korda (Ulysses S. Grant) defends "the people's general" against criticisms leveled by subordinates and historians (Eisenhower's presidency flits by in an admiring 64 pages), but for all his fulsome comparisons of Eisenhower to Napoleon and Grant, the author's case is weak. Korda's approving gloss on Ike's "broad front" approach-directing "all the Allied armies to engage the enemy at every point... until superior numbers inevitably ground the Germans down" because "he did not think a single, clever stroke would do it"-makes Eisenhower sound like a terrible strategist. At best, Ike comes off as a competent diplomat-in-arms, enabling egomaniacs like Churchill, De Gaulle, Montgomery and Patton to cooperate, and soothing wife Mamie's anxieties over his glamorous secretary. Unfortunately, Eisenhower's self-effacing affability in this role means his story is usually upstaged by the colorful prima donnas around him. A more critical analysis might have made for a more interesting biography. Photos. (Aug. 21)

Copyright 2007 Reed Business Information
Kirkus Reviews
Distinguished man of letters and former Simon & Schuster editor-in-chief Korda (Journey to Revolution, 2006, etc.) stylishly and sympathetically restores Dwight D. Eisenhower to an eminent place in the military and political pantheon. The author begins in 1942, when Ike gained instant fame as supreme commander of the European theater of operations and began the dogged strategic planning that would defeat Nazi Germany. The long-postponed Allied invasion of France finally took place on June 6, 1944, and it showcased Ike's skillful ability to manage staggering logistics and bring together the kind of manpower that the effort demanded. His sincerity, grasp of detail and lack of ceremony made it impossible for even the British and French not to like the unassuming, hardworking general. Korda too is evidently enchanted by the decency of his subject, for whom "duty would always come first." Unscholarly and outdoorsy in Mennonite Kansas, Ike escaped small-town Abilene by attending West Point. Second Lieutenant Eisenhower married Denver debutante Mamie Doud in 1916, and they began a trying, peripatetic Army life that required long absences on Ike's part and enormous amounts of suffering and forgiveness on Mamie's. After tours of duty in Panama and France, in 1932 Eisenhower found his first mentor in General Douglas MacArthur, under whom he worked for six years at the War Department and then in the Philippines, building up America's "arsenal of democracy." With the outbreak of World War II, Ike was summoned to London to make order out of chaos, squired around by glamorous volunteer driver Kay Summersby, who may or may not have been his lover. (The author demurely chooses not to judge.) Korda'scommand of military history is impressive in the wartime chapters. He treats Eisenhower's two-term presidency more summarily, but hails Ike's little-regarded devotion to keeping America out of war and the groundwork laid for the Civil Rights movement. An engaging history, guided by an elegant, witty sense of characterization.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780060756666
  • Publisher: HarperCollins Publishers
  • Publication date: 5/6/2008
  • Edition description: Reprint
  • Pages: 800
  • Sales rank: 266,437
  • Product dimensions: 5.90 (w) x 9.00 (h) x 1.80 (d)

Meet the Author

Michael Korda is the former editor in chief of Simon & Schuster and the author of many bestselling books. He served in the Royal Air Force and lives in Dutchess County, New York. His biography of Robert E. Lee is forthcoming in the summer of 2014.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Ike
An American Hero

Chapter One

"Ike"

Ours is neither a nation nor a culture much given to extended hero worship.

Ralph Waldo Emerson understood his countrymen only too well when he wrote, "Every hero becomes a bore at last." After all, within his own lifetime Emerson would see both Andrew Jackson and Ulysses S. Grant cut down to size. There is no place in American life for the enduring national cult of a hero, no equivalent of France's national passion for Napoleon (a cult strangely enough by no means limited to the French), England's sentimental hero worship of Nelson (and, increasingly, of Winston Churchill), Russia's glorification of Peter the Great.

Perhaps it is the price of being a democracy, and of a deep, inherent distrust of the very idea of an elite—we are all egalitarians at heart, or at least feel a need to pay homage to the idea of equality. We have a natural tendency to nibble away at the great figures of the past; to dig through their lives for flaws, mistakes, and weaknesses; to judge them severely by the standards and beliefs of the present, rather than those that prevailed when they were alive. Thus Washington has been marginalized as a dead white male, and as a slave owner, and remembered more for his ill-fitting false teeth than his generalship. Thus Jefferson has been downgraded from his lofty position as the author of the Declaration of Independence to being treated not merely as a slave owner, but as a spendthrift and hypocrite who slept with his own female slaves. Thus Grant's tomb stood for many decades forlorn and almost unvisited on Riverside Drive and 122nd Street in New York City, despitethe fact that it was, until the end of the nineteenth century, a bigger tourist attraction than the Statue of Liberty.

It is a simple fact of American life, this urge to splash graffiti on the pantheon of our heroes. In other countries—or cultures—the building up of national heroes is a full-time job, respected and well rewarded, in France with membership in the Académie Française and the Légion d'Honneur, in the United Kingdom with knighthoods and a cozy place in the cultural establishment; but in ours, whole profitable segments of the media and publishing industries prosper by tearing them down. Sic transit gloria mundi might as well be our national motto.

In his own lifetime, for example, Dwight D. Eisenhower underwent a rapid transition from world-class, five-star hero to being ridiculed as an old fuddy-duddy in the White House, out of touch with what was happening in the country, more interested in his golf score than in politics, deaf to the pleas of civil rights leaders (or at least hard of hearing), and, toward the end of his eight years as president, overshadowed by the youth and glamour of the young John F. Kennedy.

It was not just journalists, or editorial cartoonists like Herblock in the Washington Post, or intellectuals of the New Frontier, who made fun of Ike—even historians of World War II began to turn their heavy guns on him, particularly admirers of General George S. Patton. Patton's advocates formed a stubborn and robust revisionist cult that would reach its peak when Patton became the hero of Richard Nixon's favorite movie; they held Ike to blame for failing to turn his fractious subordinate loose to seize Berlin before the Russians did, and by that mistake ensuring a divided Germany and the cold war—even though Patton was too far south to have done this.

Like those revisionists who insist that Blücher, instead of Wellington, won the Battle of Waterloo by arriving on the battlefield with his Prussians at the end of the day, or those who believe that Lee would have won the Battle of Gettysburg if only he had listened to Longstreet's advice, Patton's admirers—sixty years after the fact—are still smarting over their hero's complaints. As to the validity of their views, one cannot do better than to quote the duke of Wellington himself, who, when a stranger came up to him on Piccadilly and said, "Mr. Jones, I presume?" is said to have replied, "If you presume that, sir, you'd presume any damned thing."

The guns had hardly fallen silent in Europe before Eisenhower's rivals and subordinates sat down to write their memoirs or edit their diaries for publication. Most of them were sharply critical of Eisenhower. On the British side of the Grand Alliance the newly ennobled field marshals Lord Alanbrooke and Viscount Montgomery, and General Lord Ismay, if they agreed on nothing else, were united in their view that Eisenhower was no strategist. Indeed General Sir Alan Brooke, as he was then, the acerbic Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS), would remark acidly in his dairy in 1943 on the subject of his plan for the invasion, "Eisenhower has got absolutely no strategical outlook." 1

On the losing side, Hitler's generals, when they came to write their memoirs, were almost all critical of Eisenhower's caution, slowness, conventional tactics, and failure to develop the single thrust that might have brought the war to an end by the winter of 1944—strong stuff from those whom he defeated.

As for the senior American and British airmen—particularly the "bomber barons," among whom the most important and outspoken was Air Chief Marshal Sir Arthur ("Bomber") Harris, Air Officer Commanding, RAF Bomber Command—they expressed in their war memoirs the conviction that had they been given a free hand and unlimited resources the war could have been won in 1944 without an invasion at all; that Eisenhower, in short, had merely wasted time, manpower, money, and fuel, all of which would have been more usefully employed destroying German cities (the RAF strategy), or the German rail network and oil industry (the strategy of the U.S. Army Air Force).

In the United States, enthusiasts for a Pacific-first strategy—centered on the figure of General Douglas MacArthur and the U.S. Navy admirals, most of whom had never wholeheartedly accepted . . .

Ike
An American Hero
. Copyright © by Michael Korda. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Available now wherever books are sold.
Read More Show Less

Table of Contents


List of Illustration     xv
List of Maps     xvii
Author's Note     xix
The Making of a Hero
"Ike"     3
"I Hope to God I Know What I'm Doing"     24
"What a Man ... Did as a Boy"     56
"Where Else Could You Get a College Education Without Cost?"     84
Second Lieutenant Eisenhower     105
"The Greatest Disappointment and Disaster in My Life"     143
The Education of a Soldier     157
The MacArthur Years     185
Command
"As Soon as You Get a Promotion They Start Talking About Another One. Why Can't They Let a Guy Be Happy with What He Has?"     231
London, 1942     268
Algiers     310
Sicily     376
Victory
"Supreme Commander, Allied Expeditionary Forces"-1944     429
Triumph-D-Day, June 6, 1944     475
Stalemate     519
Armageddon, 1945     552
"I Had Never Realized That Ike Was as Big a Man"     584
The White House Years
"I Like Ike!"     637
"And So We Came to Gettysburg and to the Farm We Had Bought Eleven Years Earlier, Where We Expected to Spend the Remainder of Our Lives"     695
"Lower the Shades!"     721
Acknowledgments     725
Notes     727
Bibliography     743
Index     749
Read More Show Less

First Chapter

Ike
An American Hero

Chapter One

"Ike"

Ours is neither a nation nor a culture much given to extended hero worship.

Ralph Waldo Emerson understood his countrymen only too well when he wrote, "Every hero becomes a bore at last." After all, within his own lifetime Emerson would see both Andrew Jackson and Ulysses S. Grant cut down to size. There is no place in American life for the enduring national cult of a hero, no equivalent of France's national passion for Napoleon (a cult strangely enough by no means limited to the French), England's sentimental hero worship of Nelson (and, increasingly, of Winston Churchill), Russia's glorification of Peter the Great.

Perhaps it is the price of being a democracy, and of a deep, inherent distrust of the very idea of an elite—we are all egalitarians at heart, or at least feel a need to pay homage to the idea of equality. We have a natural tendency to nibble away at the great figures of the past; to dig through their lives for flaws, mistakes, and weaknesses; to judge them severely by the standards and beliefs of the present, rather than those that prevailed when they were alive. Thus Washington has been marginalized as a dead white male, and as a slave owner, and remembered more for his ill-fitting false teeth than his generalship. Thus Jefferson has been downgraded from his lofty position as the author of the Declaration of Independence to being treated not merely as a slave owner, but as a spendthrift and hypocrite who slept with his own female slaves. Thus Grant's tomb stood for many decades forlorn and almost unvisited on Riverside Drive and 122nd Street in New York City,despite the fact that it was, until the end of the nineteenth century, a bigger tourist attraction than the Statue of Liberty.

It is a simple fact of American life, this urge to splash graffiti on the pantheon of our heroes. In other countries—or cultures—the building up of national heroes is a full-time job, respected and well rewarded, in France with membership in the Académie Française and the Légion d'Honneur, in the United Kingdom with knighthoods and a cozy place in the cultural establishment; but in ours, whole profitable segments of the media and publishing industries prosper by tearing them down. Sic transit gloria mundi might as well be our national motto.

In his own lifetime, for example, Dwight D. Eisenhower underwent a rapid transition from world-class, five-star hero to being ridiculed as an old fuddy-duddy in the White House, out of touch with what was happening in the country, more interested in his golf score than in politics, deaf to the pleas of civil rights leaders (or at least hard of hearing), and, toward the end of his eight years as president, overshadowed by the youth and glamour of the young John F. Kennedy.

It was not just journalists, or editorial cartoonists like Herblock in the Washington Post, or intellectuals of the New Frontier, who made fun of Ike—even historians of World War II began to turn their heavy guns on him, particularly admirers of General George S. Patton. Patton's advocates formed a stubborn and robust revisionist cult that would reach its peak when Patton became the hero of Richard Nixon's favorite movie; they held Ike to blame for failing to turn his fractious subordinate loose to seize Berlin before the Russians did, and by that mistake ensuring a divided Germany and the cold war—even though Patton was too far south to have done this.

Like those revisionists who insist that Blücher, instead of Wellington, won the Battle of Waterloo by arriving on the battlefield with his Prussians at the end of the day, or those who believe that Lee would have won the Battle of Gettysburg if only he had listened to Longstreet's advice, Patton's admirers—sixty years after the fact—are still smarting over their hero's complaints. As to the validity of their views, one cannot do better than to quote the duke of Wellington himself, who, when a stranger came up to him on Piccadilly and said, "Mr. Jones, I presume?" is said to have replied, "If you presume that, sir, you'd presume any damned thing."

The guns had hardly fallen silent in Europe before Eisenhower's rivals and subordinates sat down to write their memoirs or edit their diaries for publication. Most of them were sharply critical of Eisenhower. On the British side of the Grand Alliance the newly ennobled field marshals Lord Alanbrooke and Viscount Montgomery, and General Lord Ismay, if they agreed on nothing else, were united in their view that Eisenhower was no strategist. Indeed General Sir Alan Brooke, as he was then, the acerbic Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS), would remark acidly in his dairy in 1943 on the subject of his plan for the invasion, "Eisenhower has got absolutely no strategical outlook." 1

On the losing side, Hitler's generals, when they came to write their memoirs, were almost all critical of Eisenhower's caution, slowness, conventional tactics, and failure to develop the single thrust that might have brought the war to an end by the winter of 1944—strong stuff from those whom he defeated.

As for the senior American and British airmen—particularly the "bomber barons," among whom the most important and outspoken was Air Chief Marshal Sir Arthur ("Bomber") Harris, Air Officer Commanding, RAF Bomber Command—they expressed in their war memoirs the conviction that had they been given a free hand and unlimited resources the war could have been won in 1944 without an invasion at all; that Eisenhower, in short, had merely wasted time, manpower, money, and fuel, all of which would have been more usefully employed destroying German cities (the RAF strategy), or the German rail network and oil industry (the strategy of the U.S. Army Air Force).

In the United States, enthusiasts for a Pacific-first strategy—centered on the figure of General Douglas MacArthur and the U.S. Navy admirals, most of whom had never wholeheartedly accepted . . .

Ike
An American Hero
. Copyright © by Michael Korda. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Available now wherever books are sold.
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4.5
( 22 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(12)

4 Star

(6)

3 Star

(2)

2 Star

(2)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 22 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 26, 2008

    Boring account

    I thought I would give this title a go based on a good review from Walter Isaacson who wrote a biography on Benjamin Franklin that I enjoyed very much. Korda is not a writer that kept me interested in reading this book. The information on Eisenhower is fascinating, but I felt more like I was reading Korda's notes, or the rough draft before putting final touches on the book. (This could be attributed to a bad editor as well'). There is vast detail of the President during his army years, and literally less than 70 of the 720 pages about Eisenhower's Presidency. Overall is was hard to stay awake during the reading, and hard to get a good feel of who Ike was as a husband, father, soldier, general, or president. It is full of detail though. I will be picking up the Biography of Eisenhower by Stephen Ambrose who is a fantastic historian and author, and I know I will not be disappointed with that reading.

    3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 21, 2008

    Outstanding Biography

    If my local library has a book, I don't usually buy it but made an exception with Michael Korda's book. It's something I want to read and refer to many times in the future. Ike, An American Hero is extremely well written, providing insights into Dwight D. Eisenhower's life from boyhood until his death. Some things I knew from having visited the Eisenhower presidential library and museum in Abilene, KS 'e.g., the influence Fox Conner had on his life'. Other things I knew from having read some of Eisenhower's books. However, Eisenhower was not one to 'blow his own horn' and bad mouth others, though he would have been well-justified in doing both when dealing with much lesser men 'e.g., Montgomery and MacArthur'. It was in reading Michael Korda's book that I learned how much of his time during World War II was spent having to deal with these men. It is utterly amazing that he was able to focus at all on the job he was assigned by Roosevelt, Churchill, Gen. George Marshall, etc., especially when some of them 'e.g., Churchill' kept him up late without thinking about the inroads they were making on his productive time. Churchill and Montgomery especially wrote autobiographies that 'spun' history the way they would like to have people remember it, but Michael Korda details reasons why some of their accounts aren't even close to the way things were. For example, Montgomery was an egotist who would like for history to record that he performed all assigned tasks 'e.g., defeat of Rommell in Africa, and the capture of Caen after D-Day' in an expeditious manner. That isn't close to the truth. This would be a great book to be assigned reading in high school and college history classes and could lead to some great discussions. Dwight Eisenhower himself has stated in his book At Ease how his childhood love of history became dulled at West Point but revived when he was with Fox Conner in Panama. Fox Conner had a vast personal history library, including works of fiction. He'd lend the books to Eisenhower, then discuss their meaning with him when they were returned. Hopefully people will either borrow or buy this book and come to the conclusion that I reached. God really did bless America by giving it a person such as Dwight Eisenhower to be one of its foremost leaders during some terrible times.

    2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 13, 2014

    Rules of DawnClan

    Hello, and welcome to DawnClan! I appreciate your willing to join, but there ARE a set of rules for you to follow. I wish to make this Clan a large, active, realistic one, so please read this before asking to join! Camp is in result two.

    • Try your best to be active! If you need to leave for more than two days then please alert the leader or deputy on it.
    • Keep focused on the roleplay; keep idle chat to a minimum.
    • No bullying or harrassment, under ANY circumstances.
    • Keep roleplay PG-13, please. Blood and gore is allowed, but NO $€*ual themes.
    • No Mary Sues or Gary Stus. If your character is beautiful, a great hunter and fighter, kind, humble, loved by everyone, and "destined to become a great leader," THEN S/HE'S NOT A GOOD CHARACTER. Try to give your character at least one major flaw, such as s/he's arrogant, crumbles under pressure, very small for their age/gender, or a horrible fighter/hunter. For example, Skystar is rather small, has awful moodswings, and she has a stumpy tail, which makes balance and stealth difficult for her.
    • This is a traditional Clan, no powers whatsoever.
    • Realistic hunting, please don't come back into camp "dragging in a deer."
    • No godmodding in battles! Here's a good example of a battle post: "Rainpaw leapt at Grassfoot, giving him a nip on his ear. She jumped off his back and aimed her sharp claws at his hind leg." A BAD example of a battle post: "Rainpaw leapt at Grassfoot, slicing his ear in half. She knocked him over, sliced his throat, and ripped out his heart." Two battle moves in a post MAXIMUM. Give your opponent a chance to fight, EVEN IF THEY'RE EVIL. However, if your opponent powerplays or godmods him/herself feel free to ignore them.
    • You can roleplay a maximum of four characters, only one can be in a high rank (deputy, medicine cat, etc)
    • Have fun, play fair! :)

    ~•Skystar

    1 out of 10 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 29, 2013

    Great Book and Insight!

    This book provides another viewpoint with some similarities and differences as written by Stephen Ambrose. Both books are a must read. Michael Korda is a fantastic writer and his book "With Wings Like Eagles" is another book that should be read to understand the tremendous struggle that Britain faced from the Luftwaffer during the Battle of Britain. The story was revieting and it kept my attention. Both books are a must read if you are fascinated with the WWII period. In highsight the Allies won, but the outcome could have been quite different had the British not held on, the Allies had not selected General Eisenhower and Marshall, that D-day was postponed (Allies not ready in 1942 or 1943), and the Allies were backed up by the might of the American industrial base.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 23, 2014

    To: Sunstar From: Ravenclaw.

    Dear Skystar,
    My name is Ravenclaw.I used to be a ForestClan cat with my apprentince , Wolfpaw. We were captured by Twoleg kits and were forced to live as kittypets. We escaped with the help of a kittypet named Patch. I am 10 moons old and Wolfpaw is 7. We are both she-cats. Wolfpaw is a very small cat for her age and is gray with brown ees. She is a great fighter and hunter. She is also energetic and impatient. I am black with blue-gray eyes. I am wise and a good fighter and hunter. I am also thin. With your permission I would like to keep training Wolfpaw. I would also like to be deputy. Wolfpaw and I know the warrior code and know the rules of DawnClan. We will always be loyal to our clan no matter what. Please respond soon.
    Yours truly,
    Ravenclaw and Wolfpaw.

    0 out of 6 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 10, 2010

    I Also Recommend:

    Ike managed the coalition of nations, which allowed the coalition to defeat Germany

    In less than four years, Dwight D. Eisenhower rose from the rank of Lt. Colonel in the U.S. Army to Supeme Commander, Allied Expeditionary Forces, and led this multinational coalition to victory over Germany in World War II. This country boy from Abilene, Kansas had the ability to get strong-willed, independent thinking and highly ambitous leaders, both military and political, to work together to ultimately achieve a great victory. Ike later became the first Commander of NATO and then a very popular two term President of the United States. The author makes Ike's story the key to understanding the Allies victory in Europe. This is a well writen, easy to read book created by a first rate historian that describes the life and times of one of America's greatest heroes.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 14, 2010

    Insightful and Balanced

    An excellent read. The author, I feel, was very balanced in his approach. For Ike to be able to contend with such a group of high strung egos and "waring" factions while keeping them focused on the task at hand is remarkable.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 2, 2010

    Ike Revealed!

    The book presents a view of Ike's leadership style not presented by the media. It is easy to understand his style based on his early childhood and life at West Point. Great book!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted March 3, 2009

    I Also Recommend:

    Heroism 101

    As the title suggests, this easily readable book delves into the personality traits that make Eisenhower "An American Hero." Almost half of the book details the war years and Eisenhower's rapid rise to Supreme Commander. The affable Ike manages to hold together an unweildy coalition of "prima donna" generals and statesmen to defeat Nazi Germany. To do so he oversees the two largest amphibious invasions in history. Eisenhower's two terms as President are rapidly dealt with in the last 100 pages--a somewhat unsatisfactory broadbrush after the detailed analysis of the war years.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 13, 2014

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted January 7, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted May 24, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted December 23, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 1, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted September 7, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted September 2, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted September 2, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 19, 2008

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 5, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted September 29, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 22 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)