Book Your Summer Shop NowBook Your Summer Shop Now
B&N Reads Blog

Shadows Over America: Matt Ruff and Victor LaValle Take on Lovecraft and Race

Shadows Over America: Matt Ruff and Victor LaValle Take on Lovecraft and Race

LovecraftBlackTomSides crop

Spend too much time with books — particularly of the kind that indulge in the pleasures of horror and dark fantasy — and it’s hard to ignore the feeling that correspondences between the volumes on your shelves are the products of more than literary coincidence.  Case in point: the day an advance copy of Matt Ruff’s Lovecraft Country — the story of African-American family pursuing occult mysteries across the landscape of segregated 1950s America —  arrived our offices, we learned that Shirley Jackson Award-winner Victor LaValle was publishing The Ballad of Black Tom, a novella of sorcery and police brutality in 1920s New York that plays off of H.P. Lovecraft’s notoriously racist story “The Horror at Red Hook.”  Something seriously synchronistic — if not downright magical — looked to be going on.

As the work of H.P. Lovecraft has moved from the exclusive domain of fantasy-and-horror fandom to the literary mainstream, so has growing awareness of the racism and xenophobia that figures so strong in works like “The Call of Cthulhu” and “The Shadow Over Innsmouth.”  Last year it was announced that the World Fantasy Award would no longer be embodied in a bust of the Providence writer. But as Ruff and LaValle’s books testify, the presence of Lovecraft as innovator and influence is as palpable as the cosmic chills many of his tales evoke.

Luckily for us, the same eldritch forces that brought Lovecraft Country and The Ballad of Black Tom into the world at nearly the same moment seemed to be at work in our favor:  Matt Ruff and Victor LaValle readily agreed to a conversation, via email, about the manifold inspirations behind their books, and the desire to find a way of “wrestling,” in LaValle’s words, with an author who has cast a long shadow over our collective dreamlife. Consider the result something like a DVD commentary track, best enjoyed after taking in the excitements of their two very different  — and very satisfying — variations on a theme. The following email exchange has been lightly edited for length and continuity. — Bill Tipper

 

Matt Ruff_Author photo SF cropMatt Ruff: When I was reading The Ballad of Black Tom — which I really enjoyed — I described it to my wife as sort of a Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead take on Lovecraft’s “The Horror at Red Hook.” I get the appeal of retelling a Lovecraft story from the point of view of a character who wouldn’t even have had a name in the original version of the tale, but I was wondering, why “Red Hook” in particular? It’s not one of Lovecraft’s better-known stories, and even Lovecraft himself didn’t seem to like it very much. What drew you to it? The New York setting?

Victor LaValle: I’m going to start by making an embarrassing admission. I had to ask my wife to explain what Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead was about. I know some of Stoppard’s plays but had never seen that one. I don’t know why I felt compelled to admit that up front — I could’ve just looked it up and pretended I got it. This is the equivalent of me grinning vacantly and trying not to appear clueless.

Victor Lavalle SF cropReally, though, I had Wide Sargasso Sea in mind when I was working on The Ballad of Black Tom. In the end it’s really the same idea as the Stoppard play — Jean Rhys chooses to tell the story of Jane Eyre‘s madwoman in the attic from long before she went mad. There’s the reclamation of a character who had been dismissed but also a very clear rebuttal to the politics of the work that inspired it. I think I read Wide Sargasso Sea for the first time in graduate school and it ran through me like an electric current. I didn’t know you could do things like that: argue with masterpieces, wrestle with the greats. “The Horror at Red Hook” isn’t a masterpiece by anyone’s definition (not even — as you noted — Lovecraft’s), but it took place in New York, my hometown, and it got New York so wrong that I felt there was enough room for me to step in and move around. Once I was in there I could start to address what I saw as the bigger problems not only in that story but in the work of Lovecraft as a whole.

This leads me to Lovecraft Country, which I tore through with great joy. The book is certainly in conversation with Lovecraft, from the title to so many notes within each story, but it hardly seems beholden to Lovecraft. I was impressed by how often you simply went off in directions that might hint at something Lovecraftian but still seemed all your own. I’m thinking of the chapter called “Jekyll in Hyde Park.” The story is about body-switching of a kind, and reminded me of Lovecraft’s “The Thing on the Doorstep,” but in all other ways you explored the real-deal political and personal consequences of a profound identity switch on a character in ways I could never imagine Lovecraft doing, or being able to do. How did you manage this balance of being inspired by Lovecraft but not beholden?

The Ballad of Black Tom

Victor LaValle

ßßß

4.2

Paperback

$17.99

Ships in 1-2 days.