Pub. Date:
Oxford University Press
Art Theory: A Very Short Introduction / Edition 1

Art Theory: A Very Short Introduction / Edition 1

by Cynthia Freeland


View All Available Formats & Editions
Current price is , Original price is $11.95. You
Select a Purchase Option (New Edition)
  • purchase options
    $7.61 $11.95 Save 36% Current price is $7.61, Original price is $11.95. You Save 36%.
  • purchase options
    $6.49 $11.95 Save 46% Current price is $6.49, Original price is $11.95. You Save 46%.
    Note: Access code and/or supplemental material are not guaranteed to be included with textbook rental or used textbook.
  • purchase options

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780192804631
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication date: 12/15/2007
Series: Very Short Introductions Series
Edition description: New Edition
Pages: 184
Sales rank: 554,406
Product dimensions: 6.80(w) x 4.30(h) x 0.50(d)
Lexile: 1310L (what's this?)

About the Author

Cynthia A. Freeland is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Houston. She has published on topics in the philosophy of art and film, ancient Greek philosophy, and feminist theory. She is also author of The Naked and the Undead: Evil and the Appeal of Horror (1999) and co-editor of Philosophy and Film (1995).

Table of Contents

List of Illustrations
1. Blood and Beauty
2. Paradigms and Purposes
3. Cultural Crossings
4. Money, Markets, Museums
5. Gender, Genius, and Guerrilla Girls
6. Cognition, Creation, Comprehension
7. Digitizing and Disseminating
Further Reading

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

Art Theory: A Very Short Introduction 3.5 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 2 reviews.
MarionII on LibraryThing 3 months ago
Best "wee book on..." series out there. I want the whole series, they're great, and this one's especially good for the reference shelf, because I knew nothing about art.
drbubbles on LibraryThing 5 months ago
I began this book with moderately high hopes. They were quickly dashed, but partially redeemed in later chapters.The one thing that this book, like pretty much any book purporting to offer some sort of explanation of art, does not do is problematize art. That is, nowhere does it discuss what distinguishes art from not-art. It considers several suggestions put forth by others, and briefly discusses what all art must have in common; but it finally accepts an expansive definition of art dependent upon intention, which is great as long as you know who the artist was and what they were thinking, but problematic when you don't. The reason for this is it's the only definition that can accommodate everything that anyone has ever called art (although I think it doesn't work very well with respect to Dada). But in doing so, it accepts that anything anyone has ever called art actually is art: which makes it useless for distinguishing, theoretically, between art and not-art. This is an important point because the amount of variation accepted as art will strongly affect the relevance and significance of different art theories. It is also an ironic point to find at the beginning of a book entitled Art Theory.Anyway.In the first chapter's discussion of Andres Serrano's "Piss Christ," so much is made of what the work is not, that I was left without a clear idea of what it is. The subsequent attempt to situate it within a long-term artistic tradition is disingenuous. I'm not saying it's not a work of art, just that this book does not make a convincing case. Chapter 3 is basically an introductory anthropology unit on why ethnocentrism is bad. Chapter 4 is basically a lament of the influence of money and markets on art, without doing much to consider it dispassionately as one of art's many influences. It leaves a distinct sense that art should be pure and unsullied by crass worldly concerns. Chapter 5 considers the influence of artists' life experiences on their work, primarily looking at sexuality. It concludes that sometimes it is an important influence, and sometimes it's not. The final two chapters are actually fairly decent: the first of them is the most philosophical chapter in the book, and the latter takes a look at electronic art.The book refers occasionally to literature and music as well as painting and photography, but I do not recall any discussion of architecture. This is disappointing because architecture is the most public art form.All in all, it's not bad, but it's not particularly good, either. It takes a strictly academic-art perspective, but academics are only a small part of the art world. If I knew of a better intro to art theory, I'd recommend it. But I don't know of any others, at least not now. I found that in attempting to simplify the subject it oversimplified, making it seem too simple, too easy in parts.