Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK

Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK

by Gerald Posner


$18.26 $19.95 Save 8% Current price is $18.26, Original price is $19.95. You Save 8%.
View All Available Formats & Editions
Choose Expedited Shipping at checkout for guaranteed delivery by Thursday, July 25


The assassination of John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, continues to inspire interest ranging from well-meaning speculation to bizarre conspiracy theories and controversial filmmaking. But in this landmark book, reissued with a new afterword for the 40th anniversary of the assassination, Gerald Posner examines all of the available evidence and reaches the only possible conclusion: Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. There was no second gunman on the grassy knoll. The CIA was not involved. And although more than four million pages of documents have been released since Posner first made his case, they have served only to corroborate his findings. Case Closed remains the classic account against which all books about JFK’s death must be measured.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781400034628
Publisher: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group
Publication date: 09/09/2003
Edition description: Reissue
Pages: 640
Sales rank: 309,744
Product dimensions: 5.20(w) x 8.00(h) x 1.23(d)

About the Author

Gerald Posner, a former Wall Street lawyer, is an award-winning author of many books on subjects ranging from Nazi war criminals, to assassinations, to the lives and careers of politicians.

Read an Excerpt


"Which One Are You?"

President John F. Kennedy had been dead less than an hour. J. D. Tippit, only the third Dallas policeman in a decade to die in the line of duty, was killed shortly after the President. Rumors swept the city. Dealey Plaza, the site of the presidential assassination, was in pandemonium. Dozens of witnesses sent the police scurrying in different directions in futile search of an assassin. While most police mobilized to hunt the President's killer, more than a dozen sped to Dallas's Oak Cliff, a quiet middle-class neighborhood, to search for Tippit's murderer.

At 1:46 P.M., after an abortive raid on a public library, a police dispatcher announced: "Have information a suspect just went in the Texas Theater on West Jefferson." Within minutes, more than six squad cars sealed the theater's front and rear exits. Police armed with shotguns spread into the balcony and the main floor as the lights were turned up. Only a dozen moviegoers were scattered inside the small theater. Officer M. N. McDonald began walking up the left aisle from the rear of the building, searching patrons along the way. Soon, he was near a young man in the third row from the back of the theater. McDonald stopped and ordered him to stand. The man slowly stood up, raised both hands, and then yelled, "Well, it is all over now." In the next instant, he punched McDonald in the face, sending the policeman's cap flying backward. McDonald instinctively lurched forward just as his assailant pulled a pistol from his waist. They tumbled over the seats as other police rushed to subdue the gunman. The gun's hammer clicked as the man pulled the trigger, but it did not fire.

After the suspect was handcuffed, he shouted, "I am not resisting arrest. Don't hit me anymore." The police pulled him to his feet and marched him out the theater as he yelled, "I know my rights. I want a lawyer." A crowd of nearly two hundred had gathered in front of the building, the rumor circulating that the President's assassin might have been caught. As the police exited, the crowd surged forward, screaming obscenities and crying, "Let us have him. We'll kill him! We want him!" The young man smirked and hollered back, "I protest this police brutality!" Several police formed a wedge and cut through the mob to an unmarked car. The suspect was pushed into the rear seat between two policemen while three officers packed into the front. Its red lights flashing, the car screeched away and headed downtown.

The suspect was calm. Again he declared, "I know my rights," and then asked, "What is this all about?" He was told he was under arrest for killing J. D. Tippit. He didn't look surprised. "Police officer been killed?" he asked. He was silent for a moment, and then he said, "I hear they burn for murder." Officer C. T. Walker, sitting on his right side, tried to control his temper: "You may find out." Again, the suspect smirked. "Well, they say it just takes a second to die," he said.

One of the police asked him his name. He refused to answer. They asked where he lived. Again just silence. Detective Paul Bentley reached over and pulled a wallet from the suspect's left hip pocket. "I don't know why you are treating me like this," he said. "The only thing I have done is carry a pistol into a movie."

Bentley looked inside the wallet. He called out the name: "Lee Oswald." There was no reaction. Then he found another identification with the name Alek Hidell. Again no acknowledgment. Bentley said, "I guess we are going to have to wait until we get to the station to find out who he actually is."

Shortly after 2:00 P.M., the squad car pulled into the basement of the city hall. The police told the suspect he could hide his face from the press as they entered the building. He shrugged his shoulders. "Why should I hide my face? I haven't done anything to be ashamed of."

The police ran him into an elevator and took him to a third-floor office. He was put into a small interrogation room, with several men standing guard, as they waited for the chief of homicide, Captain Will Fritz. Suddenly, another homicide detective, Gus Rose, entered the room. He had the suspect's billfold in his hand, and he pushed two plastic cards forward. "One says Lee Harvey Oswald and one says Alek Hidell. Which one are you?"

A smirk again crossed his face. "You figure it out," he said.

For the past thirty years historians, researchers, and government investigators have tried to deal with Oswald's simple challenge. Although the identity of the suspect remained in doubt for only a few more minutes at that Dallas police station, the search has continued for the answer to the broader question of who Lee Harvey Oswald was. Understanding him is the key to finding out what happened in Dallas on November 22, 1963.

Oswald was born on October 18, 1939, into a lower-middle-class family in a downtrodden New Orleans neighborhood. His father, Robert Edward Lee Oswald, died two months before his birth. His mother, Marguerite, was a domineering woman, consumed with self-pity both over the death of her husband and because she had to return to work to support Lee, his brother, Robert, and a halfbrother, John Pic, from the first of her three marriages. Marguerite played an important role in Oswald's development, and conspiracy critics cast her in a positive light. Jim Marrs, author of Crossfire, one of two books upon which the movie JFK was based, downplays Oswald's formative years: "Despite much conjecture, there is little evidence that Lee's childhood was any better or any worse than others." Anthony Summers, in his best-selling Conspiracy, quotes a relative describing Marguerite as "a woman with a lot of character and good morals, and I'm sure that what she was doing for her boys she thought was the best at the time."

The truth is quite different. Robert described his mother as "rather quarrelsome" and "not easy to get along with when she didn't get her own way." According to Robert, Marguerite tried to "dominate" and "control" the entire family, and the boys found it "difficult . . . to put up with her." John Pic developed a "hostility" toward her and felt "no motherly love." Although she wanted to rule her sons' lives, she was unable to cope with them following the death of her husband. High-strung, and failing to keep any job very long,* she committed Robert and John Pic to an orphanage. She wanted also to send Lee but he was too young to be accepted. Instead, she shuffled him between her sister and an assortment of housekeepers and baby-sitters. The temporary arrangement did not work. Marguerite had let a couple move into her home to help care for Lee, but had to fire them when she discovered they had been whipping him to control his "unmanageable" disposition. She admitted it "was difficult with Lee," juggling different jobs and homes (they moved five times before Lee was three). The instability had its effect on Oswald. Years later, in an introductory note to a manuscript, he wrote: "Lee Harvey Oswald was born in Oct 1939 in New Orleans, La. the son of a Insuraen [sic] Salesman whose early death left a far mean streak of indepence [sic] brought on by negleck [sic]."

The day after Christmas 1942, Marguerite finally placed three-year-old Lee into the orphanage, where he joined his two brothers. Nearly one hundred youngsters lived at the Bethlehem Children's Home. The atmosphere was relaxed, and Lee's older brothers watched out for him during his stay there, which was quite uneventful. In early 1944, Marguerite unexpectedly checked her sons out of the Bethlehem Home and moved to Dallas. She relocated there because of her personal interest in a local businessman, Edwin Ekdahl, whom she had met six months earlier in New Orleans. They married in May of the following year. Lee's new stepfather worked for a utility company and extensive travel was part of his job. Robert and John Pic were placed in a military boarding school and Marguerite and Lee traveled with Ekdahl. The business trips and short relocations were so extensive that Lee missed most of his first year of school, but by late October, they settled in Benbrook Texas, a suburb of Fort Worth. Just after his sixth birthday, Lee was admitted to Benbrook Common Elementary.

*She admitted in her Warren Commission testimony to holding more than a dozen jobs and being fired from half of them.

But young Oswald was no longer concerned about the frequent moves or his absence from school because he had found a friend in his stepfather. Lee's halfbrother, John Pic, recalled, "I think Lee found in him the father he never had. He had treated him real good and I am sure that Lee felt the same way. I know he did." Soon after the marriage, however, Marguerite and Ekdahl began arguing. "She wanted more money out of him," recalls Pic. "That was the basis of all arguments."* The fights increased steadily in vituperation and intensity. Ekdahl often walked out, staying at a hotel, and in the summer of 1946, Marguerite moved with Lee to Covington, Louisiana. But Ekdahl and Marguerite soon reunited. Lee was ecstatic when his stepfather moved back in, but he hated the fighting and separations. "I think Lee was a lot more sensitive than any of us realized at the time," recalled his brother, Robert.

*Marguerite was always concerned about money. After the assassination, she almost always refused to give an interview or sit for photographs unless paid. Marina, Lee's wife, said, "She has a mania--only money, money, money." Her son John Pic said in 1964 that money was "her god."

The uncertainty in the marriage prevented Lee from ever settling into a single neighborhood and school. In September 1946, he enrolled in a new school, Covington Elementary, but was again in the first grade, because he had not completed the required work at Benbrook. After five months, Marguerite withdrew him from Covington and they moved back to Fort Worth, where Lee enrolled in his third school, the Clayton Public Elementary. He finally finished the first grade, but soon after he was registered for the second grade in the fall, they moved again. A schoolmate at Clayton, Philip Vinson, recalled that while Oswald was not a bully, he was a leader of one of three or four schoolyard gangs. Since he was a year older than his classmates, "they seemed to look up to him because he was so well built and husky . . . he was considered sort of a tough-guy type." Vinson also noted, however, that none of the boys in Oswald's gang ever played with him after school or went to his home. "I never went to his house, and I never knew anybody who did," said Vinson.

In January 1948, Ekdahl moved out permanently, and he started divorce proceedings in March. Soon after, Marguerite moved to a run-down house in a poor Fort Worth, neighborhood, adjoining railroad tracks. Lee was enrolled in another school, the Clark Elementary, his fourth. Unable to afford the tuition at military boarding school for her other two sons, Marguerite moved them in with her and Lee. Robert Oswald and John Pic described the new home as "lower-class" and "prisonlike," and they found Lee even less communicative than when they had previously left the household, often "brooding for hours" at a time. Lee had always been a quiet child. But with the constant moving, he did not easily fit in with his schoolmates and seldom made friends.

In June 1948, the bitter divorce proceedings came to trial. Lee was brought to court to testify, but refused, saying he would not know the truth from a lie. While the divorce dragged along, he stayed home alone with a pet dog, a gift from a neighbor. His brother noticed that he seemed to withdraw further into himself.

That summer, Marguerite and her sons moved once again to Benbrook, Texas. By the autumn they returned to Fort Worth, the thirteenth move since Lee's birth. He was enrolled in the third grade at Arlington Heights Elementary. With her marriage over, Marguerite now gave Lee all her attention, spoiling and protecting him. "She always wanted to let Lee have his way about everything," recalled her sister, Lillian Murret. Afraid he could be hurt in physical activities like sports, she instead encouraged gentler pursuits like tap dancing, but he preferred to stay home by himself or with her. Until he was almost eleven years of age, Lee often slept in the same bed with his mother.

According to Pic, who admittedly resented his mother more than Robert did, Marguerite's attitudes made the home atmosphere depressing. She was jealous of others, resented what they had, and constantly complained about how unfairly life treated her. "She didn't have many friends and usually the new friends she made she didn't keep very long," recalled Pic. "I remember every time we moved she always had fights with the neighbors or something or another." Pic felt so strongly about her that after the assassination he said that if Lee was guilty, then he "was aided with a little extra push from his mother in the living conditions that she presented to him." Even Lee's wife, Marina, later said that "part of the guilt" was with Marguerite, because she did not provide him the correct education, leadership, or guidance.

She did not encourage him to attend school when Lee whined that he did not like it. Instead, his mother told him he was brighter and better than other children, and reinforced his feeling that he learned more at home by reading books than from listening to his teachers. "She told me that she had trained Lee to stay in the house," Marguerite's sister, Lillian, recalled, "to stay close to home when she wasn't there; and even to run home from school and remain in the house or near the house. . . . He just got in the habit of staying alone like that." Oswald's cousin Marilyn Murret said that Marguerite thought it was better for him to stay at home alone than to "get in with other boys and do things they shouldn't do."

When Lee visited the Murrets during this period, Lillian found "he wouldn't go out and play. He would rather just stay in the house and read or something." She did not think it was healthy for him to be inside all the time, so the Murrets took him out, but immediately noticed "he didn't seem to enjoy himself." "He was obviously very unhappy," his aunt concluded.

Neighbors noticed the odd relationship between the overbearing mother and the introverted youngster. Mrs. W. H. Bell, a neighbor in Benbrook, remembered Lee as a loner who did not like to be disciplined. Myrtle Evans, a good friend of Marguerite, said she "was too close to Lee all the time." Evans said Lee was "a bookworm" even at seven years of age, and that his mother "spoiled him to death." "The way he kept to himself just wasn't normal," Evans recalled.

Table of Contents


Author's Note,
1. "WHICH ONE ARE YOU?" Oswald's Formative Years,
2. "THE BEST RELIGION IS COMMUNISM" Oswald in the Marines,
3. THE WAR OF THE DEFECTORS Yuriy Nosenko and Oswald's Defection,
4. "THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS" Marina and Lee in Russia,
5. "I'LL NEVER GO BACK TO THAT HELL" Dallas, 1962,
6. "HUNTER OF FASCISTS" The Assassination Attempt on General Walker,
7. "HANDS OFF CUBA" New Orleans, Summer 1963, Part I,
8. "OUR PAPA IS OUT OF HIS MIND" New Orleans, Summer 1963, Part II,
9. "HIS MOOD WAS BAD" Mexico City,
10. "WHEN WILL ALL OUR FOOLISHNESS COME TO AN END?" Dallas, October–November 1963,
12. "HE LOOKS LIKE A MANIAC" Oswald's Escape,
13. "HE HAD A DEATH LOOK" Parkland and Bethesda,
14. "MY GOD, THEY ARE GOING TO KILL US ALL" The Single Bullet,
16. "I AM JACK RUBY. YOU ALL KNOW ME" The Murder of Oswald,
17. "A RELIGIOUS EVENT" The Warren Commission and the Conspiracy Buffs,
18. "BLACK IS WHITE, AND WHITE IS BLACK" The Jim Garrison Fiasco,
19. "WHAT HAPPENED TO THE TRUTH?" The House Select Committee and Latest Developments,

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

Case Closed : Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK 3.8 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 33 reviews.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Where does the evidence lead? That is the central question in both the realms of both science and history. We can believe what we want, but it will be either with a factual basis to support it or it will not. Generally, sources that are credible, and are as close to the event as possible have the most weight in determining the factuality of an event. The use of primary sources from the time of the event is also crucial in determining the facts of the matter at hand. The book spends its first 40% concentrating on Oswald himself. The picture that emerges is one of a incredibly small man who possesses two of the worst traits possible; arrogance and stupidity. Time and again, Posner provides eyewitness testimony to the fact that Oswald was simply a blithering idiot and/or a complete loon. His mental state one could charitably claim as disturbed, yet he never got any help. He comes to his Marxism by reading and cannot adequately defend himself against competing views except by argument. He goes to Russia, finds life there to be in opposition to the worker's paradise he envisioned, and comes home with his Russian wife and child. Upon returning home, he drifts from job to job and attempts to curry favor with the American Communist Party by being the only member of his local Fair Play for Cuba organization. He is delusional, grandiose, yet paranoid. Above all else, he wants to make a name for himself. In the end, it is that need to be famous which puts him on the sixth floor of the Texas Book Depository on that fateful day. Posner spends much time going through the timeline of the events of that weekend, along the way destroying the various conspiracy theories that have arisen in the last 50 years. Some of the competing theories have at least a kernel of believability to them, but some - such as the switching of JFK's body at Love Field on Air Force One - simply defy logic and common sense. But Posner dissects all of the major alternate theories and goes about eliminating them as possible explanations. The problem with most conspiracies is they can only be kept truly secret is if only one person is left alive who knows the plot. BOTTOM LINE: This is the definitive work on the Kennedy assassination and worth reading whether you believe Oswald did it or not.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I was very disappointed by Posner¿s Case Closed. I would have welcomed a well argued book supporting the single-gunner theory of the Kennedy assassination. Unfortunately, despite its many favorable reviews and the author¿s claims to greater significance, the book is little more than one more overwritten, chronological condensation of The Warren Commission report. Although it has a long bibliography, the attentive reader (I guess that most of the reviewers were not) cannot help but notice that virtually all of the footnotes cite ¿factual¿ evidence from The Warren Commission report itself. The author, who claims to have a law degree, has a serious problem with circular logic. The many conspiracy theories, which in their totality comprise a rejection of the official explanation of the assassination as presented in The Warren Commission Report, cannot be refuted with evidence taken the very Warren Commission Report they take issue with! Given this basic flaw in the book, the author¿s ridicule of many conspiracy theory advocates as people out to make a quick buck, is really a case of the pot calling the kettle black. His habit of lumping all conspiracy theory proponents together is also quite annoying. The book is full of strange contradictions and omissions, too. He correctly notes that witnesses are notoriously unreliable, casually dismissing virtually all witnesses supporting alternative views of the killing as misguided, mistaken or dishonest, and then proceeds to devote at least half of this book to the testimony of innumerable Warren Commission witnesses. Even though the author has virtually no experience or knowledge of organized crime in the US, he dismisses any possible mafia involvement in the killing, based, once again, on what many would legitimately call questionable FBI testimony. This is especially curious, because this is testimony from agents working under the intense scrutiny of a man who repeatedly and enthusiastically for most of his life denied the existence of organized crime in the United States, J. Edgar Hoover. In what is my favorite quote in the book, Posner shows that the mafia could never have been involved in the assassination, by referring to the WC testimony of a long-time FBI agent. ¿They don¿t ¿ go after judges, they don¿t go after FBI agents or cops¿they will only go after those people when they have stolen money from them and double-crossed them.¿ A more succinct argument for mafia involvement could hardly be made. After all we now know that the mafia heavily funded the Kennedy election campaign, only to become the target of an intense Justice Department crackdown. It is not surprising that the book is full of the very contradictions that gave rise to the alternative theories to the WC Report, since it relies so heavily upon it. Over a third of the book is devoted to an extremely tedious and detailed version of Oswald¿s life, starting with his birth, based entirely on WC materials, too. I think Posner also inadvertently highlighted the glaring weakness and implausibility of the ¿rear-entry¿ theory of the fatal shot, by pointing out how dozens of expert trauma doctors in the Dallas emergency room were too busy attending to the President¿s small throat wound to notice that the right front forehead of a patient (who was lying on his back) was missing. At least, that is the explanation presented in the WC Report and repeated in this book. In fact, we now know that all the doctors described the President as having an enormous exit wound toward the right, rear of his head. Since most of Posner¿s ¿original¿ research is based upon reports in the media, it is only fair to point out that recent media efforts have uncovered important documents in the confidential archives of the Warren Commission that directly refute the Commission¿s version of the doctors¿ testimony and which raise serious doubts about the Commission¿s objectivity and the sustainability of the single-shooter theory.
Major_Kelly More than 1 year ago
Gerald Posner just about slams the JFK case shut with this amazing true crime story. Despite the laundry list of people who MIGHT have wanted to kill JFK, Posner, through a combination of biography, forensics and just plain facts, makes a pretty airtight case that Lee Harvey Oswald killed John F. Kennedy and that he acted alone. Far from being a pawn in a larger game, Oswald was a penny-ante loser, a wife beater and a rabid Marxist. Posner interviews former KGB agents who said they considered Oswald too unstable to spy for them, much less assassinate someone. When it comes to the events in Dealey Plaza, Posner's excellent forensic sources answer all of the questions, including the so-called "magic bullet". For those well-read in JFK conspiracy tracts, Posner picks them apart piece by piece with crushing logic. Read this book, and you'll no longer wonder who killed our President.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
for every history class. As one who holds both a law degree and a master of library and information science, my query to those who believe in any one of umpteen conspiracy theories is always "What is your evidence? What sources are you relying on?" Posner's book is fully footnoted and citations and explanations are provided in abundance. Despite the fact that it was published more than 20 years ago, the evidence originally considered by the Warren Commission has not only withstood the test of time, but testing methods not available in the 1960s have confirmed the original findings. Unfortunately, because of the Kennedy aura (I'm a big fan of JFK and the entire Kennedy family), people simply do not want to believe that a lone nut with a gun was able to pull off the crime of the century. Yet, this type of crime is practically an everyday occurrence in gun-happy America, and you can bet that if the Secret Service weren't so much more able to do their jobs today, the current president would no doubt have met a similar fate as JFK. Read this book AFTER you've read numerous conspiracy accounts and watched Oliver Stone's movie. You will realize you've been duped by those who are making a huge profit from exploiting those who like to believe in mythology. Case closed.
Guest More than 1 year ago
This book explores the lives of Lee Oswald and Jack Ruby. While conspiracy buffs look at fuzzy pictures of leaves and see gunmen, this book gives amazing, if sometime tedious, detail about the lives of the two crucial players in the 1963 Kennedy assassination. You will learn learn that Oswald was an erratic, unstable loser who sought attention. The KGB, who watched him on wife-hunting trip to Russia, called him 'pathetic.' You will also learn that Ruby was a violent wannabe who tried hard to know the right people- petty gangsters and cops. Any conspiracy would be foolish to rely on these two. You will learn that Lee Oswald certainly fired 3 shots, that he could have easily hit the motorcade, and that it was pure luck that put Jack Ruby was in place and time to shoot Oswald. Reading deeper, you may recognize why conspiracy buffs continue to prattle on: it is hard to accept that two insiginficant people could affect the direction of the country so much. But they did. As an aside, Case Closed also details the dishonesty of Jim Garrison, the seminal conspiracy buff. He did his part in maintaining Louisiana's status as the most corrupt state in the union. If you believe in a conspiracy, don't read this book. As a True Believer your world has no room for the facts you'll read here. If your mind is open, or want to educate yourself in gory detail, then this is a good read.
Guest More than 1 year ago
Posner starts the story where it belongs: on the warped mind of Lee Harvey Oswald. Remarkably, he devotes over 200 pages to him before moving on to other issues. He also straightens out three major concerns: (1) Oswald had 8 seconds, not 5 (he needed no more than 6), (2) 3 bullets were fired, not 4 (old evidence to the contrary is now refuted); and (3) the 'magic bullet' was in fact a straight line trajectory from Kennedy to Governor Connelley. He also eviscerates Jim Garrison and Oliver Stone along the way -not with hyperbole but with stubborn facts. The truth, in turns out, is as compelling as the fiction -- it simply turns out that the entire story is about a complex loner, Lee Harvey Oswald.
Guest More than 1 year ago
This should be required reading before anyone wanders into the bizarre world of assassination conspiracy books. This book is so beautifully researched and so compelling that its hard to believe people are still buying conspiracy books about a murder than was such a simple and open and shut case. A lot of the material in this book destroys conspiracy theories from other authors, but primarilly it is a book that goes into exquisite detail of Oswald's life and the event , with a fair amount covering Jack Ruby and Jim Garrison, the totally discredited DA who was portrayed in the movie JFK. Once I reached the part about the events in Dealey Plaza, I couldn't put it down. It reminded me of At Dawn We Slept in terms of its thoroughness. Other conspiracy books now look like simple plays for money from the ever gullible public.
Guest More than 1 year ago
Thank you Gerald Posner for writing a book that restores some sanity to the discussion about the JFK assassination! After allowing the professional conspiracy authors (none of whom possess any competence in historical scholarship, photographic analysis or forensic science) to have free rein with their duplicitous presentations of conspiracy theories for too long, Posner finally presents the blunt facts that exposes their intellectual and scientific shallowness and shows that Oswald acted alone, case closed. It is a sad comment on the gullibility of the American public that for years they have swallowed the bogus arguments of conspiracy authors, who among other things have resorted to deception and false evidence to present their non-existent tales of conspiracy. Thank you Gerald Posner for cutting through the nonsense and giving us the simple, unvarnished truth!
Guest More than 1 year ago
A tremendous piece of work. For the question of why the President's head flys backwards, there is a thorough explanation in this book. Just read it, and you won't say the word conspiracy again when discussing the Kennedy Assasination..
lesadee on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I enjoy a good conspiracy theory as much as anyone, but this one just rips the Kennedy theory to shreds. I've read this book multiple times because I just love the way it answers so many "questions" about who saw/heard/did what that day in DAllas.
terip on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I'm still working my way through the book, but it is fascinating. Out of all the Kennedy assassination books I've read, none have covered Oswald like this book does.
louis_elrod on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
In my opinion, the definitive book on the Kennedy assassination. Discusses Oswald in depth and every theory known at the time of the writing.
J.v.d.A. on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
Well written and researched book about a very well worn subject and one which would be very difficult to come away from still able to give credence to the plethora of conspiracy theories. Posner totally debunks all the popularist garbage that has cropped up around the assasination of JFK over the years and proves almost beyond a doubt that Oswald acted alone. Great book.
ehines on LibraryThing More than 1 year ago
I am not well-informed enough to do a critical review of this book, but the case it presents contra the bulk of conspiratorial writing is pretty damning, and the profile he creates of Oswald is a compelling portrait of a would-be assassin.
Spaboy More than 1 year ago
JFK was assassinated when I was 10 years old.  I thought the Warren Commission Report was gospel for about 20 years, then I began studying the conspiracy theories, and did so for about another 20 years, having changed my belief that there was indeed a conspiracy.  Then along came "Case Closed" and the enhanced video evidence of the Zapruder film that proved to be beyond any doubt that  both JFK and Connally were struck by one bullet simultaneously.  I'm all done with the conspiracy books.  Case closed!
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Guest More than 1 year ago
Lee Harvey Oswald couldn't not have been the lone assassin, not a chance. I can tell that by watching the Zapruder film. It is EXTREMELY evident that the President was shot from the front. Why else would his head jolt backwards? I do not believe, nor will I ever be convinced that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
Guest More than 1 year ago
I took a class on the assassination. I went in sure as anything there was a conspiracy. Posner's book changed my mind. Looking at the conspiracy through a historical lens there is absolutely, positively no way there was a conspiracy. Anyone who reads this book and still holds on to a conspiracy viewpoint needs open their mind a little. It was well researched, well documented and well presented. Compare this book with Crossfire by Jim Marrs, or any other pro-conspiracy book. There differences would be clear to a child. Posner systematically disproves almost evey conspiracy theory in unequivical language. Instead of a mish-mash of 'maybes' or 'possiblies' or 'unexplainabities', as Marrs or other pro-conspiracy writers use. This book is a refreshing look at an event that has been blown way out of proportion by people who watch too much X-files. Kudos to Posner.
Guest More than 1 year ago
This book showa how Posner is able to put together a book only exhibiting his true talents as a writer that only deals with reality. This book emphasises the importance of truth in a subject where truth don't necessarily come out too often. A must read for someone who can't decide what to think about the JFK Assasination.
Guest More than 1 year ago
It takes great courage to destroy myths. Gerald Posner has effectively done so with CASE CLOSED. This well-written and fully documented work removes the doubt and reminds us all of the one indisputable fact: THERE IS NOT ONE SHREAD OF HARD EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT A CONSPIRACY IN THE ASSASSINATION OF JFK. Where is it? In a fuzzy polaroid photograph or a 'well, I think' interview? It's time to stop pole vaulting over anthills. Real history. Mr. Posner has provided us with what should be the final analysis. For what it's worth, I was one of the most ardent conspiracy buffs around until I read CASE CLOSED. That is a five star review in itself.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Guest More than 1 year ago
Gerald Posner did a good job of researching key areas of the murder of JFK. From Garrison and his willingness to recruit people to lie about information to Oswalds' disgust with American life. I was always a firm believer that Oswald was a pawn for the gov. but many of the key points of past conspiracy theories are answered with some honest insight into the events that transpired. Many of the reviews I've read sound like people who did not even read this book. A lot of questions are posed to the conspriacy buffs out there that aren't being answered!!