Want it by Wednesday, September 26?
Order by 12:00 PM Eastern and choose Expedited Shipping at checkout.
Same Day shipping in Manhattan. See Details
Miss Lucy Pym, a popular English psychologist, is guest lecturer at a physical training college. The year's term is nearly over, and Miss Pym -- inquisitive and observant -- detects a furtiveness in the behavior of one student during a final exam. She prevents the girl from cheating by destroying her crib notes. But Miss Pym's cover-up of one crime precipitates another -- a fatal "accident" that only her psychological theories can prove was really murder.
|Product dimensions:||5.25(w) x 8.00(h) x 0.70(d)|
About the Author
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
It is kind of odd that I should be the first to write a review about this wonderful little mystery. It is not that the plot is deep or the mystery confusing in middle, but it is the way Tey has written the book. Fluid flow.Unputtable.Highly enjoyable.Expect the bits of racism common with writers' of her generation, the rest is just superb narrative and I must tell you all to read the book.It is a diffrent genre of mystery alltogether.
Reading something by Josephine Tey has been on my “to be read” list for a while – I’m a huge fan of other Golden Age mystery authors and she is ranked up there with Sayers, Christie, Allingham and Marsh. It’s been a few days since I read this now, and I’m still trying to decide if I liked it. It is very different from a standard murder mystery, in fact, if I hadn’t read the blurb (which I think gives away too much), I wouldn’t have realized I was reading a murder mystery. You’re more than two thirds of the way through the book before anything unpleasant happens. However, despite that, it was an enjoyable read. Miss Pym, the heroine, is a quirky but fun character, and the occasional humorous non sequitur reminded me a little bit of Douglas Adams' humor. The setting in a women’s college and some of the themes throughout the book reminded me quite strongly of Gaudy Night (published in 1935 – just over a decade earlier), though it didn’t feel like a knockoff, just familiar. As I said earlier, I’m not entirely sure that I liked it. I would certainly rank it below the other four authors previously mentioned. It didn’t follow the normal conventions of a mystery, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it did take some recalibrating. I think I would read more Josephine Tey, but I’m in no hurry to run out and get another one. If I may borrow from the collegiate world, I would rate this as Golden Age Mysteries 201 - after you've investigated the subject in Golden Age Mysteries 101 (Sayers, Christie, and so on) and want to explore further, this would be a good step. *This review originally appear at Lector's Books*