Presidential Debate Negotiation from 1960 to 1988: Setting the Stage for Prime-Time Clashes
Since their inception, the presidential debates Americans have watched on television were carefully negotiated. This book closely examines a previously unexamined type of political communication, presidential debate negotiation. While it has been widely known that all general election presidential debates since 1960 have been negotiated by the participating candidates, no one has ever completed a systematic study of them. In particular, the 1960, 1976, 1980, 1984, and 1988 negotiations were examined in detail. For each of these election cycles, a comprehensive narrative of what occurred during the pre-debate negotiations was constructed based on primary source materials, media accounts, and other secondary sources. Comparisons across election cycles were made in order to draw some conclusions about presidential debate negotiation.

Presidential debate negotiations are not just negotiations, but rather also a form of political rhetoric for several different players. The research concluded that that there are five contexts in which presidential debate rhetoric occurs and the rhetoric is aimed at two audiences. Within each context, the functions and strategies of the rhetoric were discussed and explained from the perspective of the sponsor of the debate(s), the candidates and their representatives, as well as the media.
1124677911
Presidential Debate Negotiation from 1960 to 1988: Setting the Stage for Prime-Time Clashes
Since their inception, the presidential debates Americans have watched on television were carefully negotiated. This book closely examines a previously unexamined type of political communication, presidential debate negotiation. While it has been widely known that all general election presidential debates since 1960 have been negotiated by the participating candidates, no one has ever completed a systematic study of them. In particular, the 1960, 1976, 1980, 1984, and 1988 negotiations were examined in detail. For each of these election cycles, a comprehensive narrative of what occurred during the pre-debate negotiations was constructed based on primary source materials, media accounts, and other secondary sources. Comparisons across election cycles were made in order to draw some conclusions about presidential debate negotiation.

Presidential debate negotiations are not just negotiations, but rather also a form of political rhetoric for several different players. The research concluded that that there are five contexts in which presidential debate rhetoric occurs and the rhetoric is aimed at two audiences. Within each context, the functions and strategies of the rhetoric were discussed and explained from the perspective of the sponsor of the debate(s), the candidates and their representatives, as well as the media.
123.0 In Stock
Presidential Debate Negotiation from 1960 to 1988: Setting the Stage for Prime-Time Clashes

Presidential Debate Negotiation from 1960 to 1988: Setting the Stage for Prime-Time Clashes

by John W. Self
Presidential Debate Negotiation from 1960 to 1988: Setting the Stage for Prime-Time Clashes

Presidential Debate Negotiation from 1960 to 1988: Setting the Stage for Prime-Time Clashes

by John W. Self

Hardcover

$123.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    In stock. Ships in 1-2 days.
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

Since their inception, the presidential debates Americans have watched on television were carefully negotiated. This book closely examines a previously unexamined type of political communication, presidential debate negotiation. While it has been widely known that all general election presidential debates since 1960 have been negotiated by the participating candidates, no one has ever completed a systematic study of them. In particular, the 1960, 1976, 1980, 1984, and 1988 negotiations were examined in detail. For each of these election cycles, a comprehensive narrative of what occurred during the pre-debate negotiations was constructed based on primary source materials, media accounts, and other secondary sources. Comparisons across election cycles were made in order to draw some conclusions about presidential debate negotiation.

Presidential debate negotiations are not just negotiations, but rather also a form of political rhetoric for several different players. The research concluded that that there are five contexts in which presidential debate rhetoric occurs and the rhetoric is aimed at two audiences. Within each context, the functions and strategies of the rhetoric were discussed and explained from the perspective of the sponsor of the debate(s), the candidates and their representatives, as well as the media.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781498520317
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication date: 12/20/2016
Pages: 274
Product dimensions: 6.10(w) x 9.10(h) x 1.00(d)

About the Author

John W. Self is associate professor and chair of the Department of Communication at Truman State University.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Why Study Presidential Debate Negotiation?
Chapter 2: 1960: Nixon v. Kennedy
Chapter 3: 1976: Ford v. Carter
Chapter 4: 1980: Reagan v. Anderson v. Carter
Chapter 5: 1984: Reagan v. Mondale
Chapter 6: 1988: Bush v. Dukakis
Chapter 7: Analysis
Appendix 1: Contexts of Presidential Debate Negotiation, Part I
Appendix 2: Contexts of Presidential Debate Negotiation, Part II
Appendix 3: 1984 Memorandum of Understanding
Appendix 4: 1988 Memorandum of Understanding
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews