×

Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.

For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

Thrones, Dominations (Lord Peter Wimsey/Harriet Vane Series)
  • Alternative view 1 of Thrones, Dominations (Lord Peter Wimsey/Harriet Vane Series)
  • Alternative view 2 of Thrones, Dominations (Lord Peter Wimsey/Harriet Vane Series)
     

Thrones, Dominations (Lord Peter Wimsey/Harriet Vane Series)

4.4 9
by Dorothy L. Sayers, Jill Paton Walsh
 

See All Formats & Editions

Deemed "one of the greatest mystery writers of this century" by the Los Angeles Times, Dorothy L. Sayers first captivated readers nearly seventy years ago with her beloved sleuths Lord Peter Wimsey and Harriet Vane in the novel Stong Poison. In Busmans's Honeymoon, her last completed Wimsey/Vane novel, Lord Peter and Harriet culminated their

Overview

Deemed "one of the greatest mystery writers of this century" by the Los Angeles Times, Dorothy L. Sayers first captivated readers nearly seventy years ago with her beloved sleuths Lord Peter Wimsey and Harriet Vane in the novel Stong Poison. In Busmans's Honeymoon, her last completed Wimsey/Vane novel, Lord Peter and Harriet culminated their partnership with marriage. Now Thrones, Dominations, Sayers' uncompleted last novel, satisfies the vast readership hungry to know what happened after the honeymoon. Here award-winning author Jill Paton Walsh picks up where Sayers left off, bringing Wimsey and Vane brilliantly to life in Sayers' unmistakable voice. Readers and reviewers are rejoicing at the return of this delightful sleuthing couple--as adept at solving a baffling murder mystery as they are a balancing the delicate demands of their loving union.

Editorial Reviews

bn.com
It's been 60 years since the last Lord Peter Wimsey/Harriet Vane mystery, and 40 years since the death of their creator, Dorothy L. Sayers. Yet here is Thrones, Dominations, picking up practically where Busman's Honeymoon left off, in the early months of the Wimseys' marriage in 1936. Turns out Sayers left a partial manuscript and outline for the book, which has been neatly and stylishly completed by Jill Paton Walsh. It's a treat for lovers of the earlier books, as Peter investigates the murder of the beloved wife of a theatrical producer -- and Harriet asks all the right questions. All "very fair and Mayfair," but we wouldn't want it any other way.

—Nancy Pate

Wall Street Journal
A superb job of seamless collaboration...A pure pleasure.
Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
After Sayers married off Lord Peter Wimsey and Harriet Vane in Busman's Honeymoon (1937), she devoted herself to translating Dante's Divine Comedy. A few short stories later appeared, noting the arrival of three Wimsey sons, and there was a rumor that suggested Sayers had another Wimsey novel in the works. Forty years after Sayers's death, that book has been triumphantly completed by British novelist Walsh (a 1994 Booker Prize finalist for Knowledge of Angels), following the original outline. If it is true that Sayers wrote the beginning, Walsh has done her predecessor a great service. Once the cast and context are established through some long exposition, the pace picks up, particularly after theatrical producer Laurence Harwell, an acquaintance of the Wimseys, discovers his cherished wife Rosamund strangled. As the nation mourns the death of King George V, upper-class women purchase black wardrobes, some of which are augmented with stylish white collars, an element which later figures as a clue. Germany invades the Rhineland. Uncrowned, Edward VIII continues to socialize with Nazis and to rendezvous with Mrs. Simpson. Lord Peter is recruited to persuade Edward to accept his responsibilities, but abdication is inevitable. The mystery involves two cases of blackmail as well as a second murder. Despite a large cast of suspects, ranging from two inept felons to a society portrait painter, every lead seems to come to a dead end. Typical of Sayers's novels, the solution derives from coincidences and some awkward plot devices. But readers have always turned to her mysteries for other reasons, such as the way Peter and Harriet settle the tumult four months of marriage has visited upon them. Harriet uncomfortably accepts her position as Lady Peter, with money and servants, while maintaining her independent identity as a mystery writer. In fact, her discussion of a plot problem with Peter helps him break a suspect's alibi. Sayers fans will relish the cooperative sleuthing of Peter, Harriet and the self-effacing Bunter as Walsh deftly captures and subtley updates the spirit of the series, endowing the iconic characters with additional depth and complexity.
Library Journal
The legion of Sayers fans will rejoice at the release of this new Lord Peter Wimsey novel 61 years after the publication of Busman's Honeymoon. So revered is the creator of the Wimsey novels that there is even a library mystery listserv called Dorothy-L. While perhaps not vintage Sayers, this novel fragment, completed by English novelist Walsh from Sayers's outline, takes up where the honeymoon left off: Now murder intrudes on the newly domesticated Lord Peter and Harriet Vane as one of their acquaintance, also newly married, is murdered. This has all the requisite stock characters, witty dialog, social satire, and red herrings of a classic Sayers, though perhaps marriage has mellowed the characters a bit too much.
-- Lucy T. Heckman, St. John's University Library, Jamaica, NY
School Library Journal
YA -- Lord Peter Wimsey is back. Walsh has completed a manuscript begun by Sayers but never finished. Readers already familiar with Lord Peter and his new wife Harriet Vane will not be disappointed and those who have yet to meet the pair will enjoy Harriet's discourses on writing mysteries for fun or profit and Lord Peter's "piffle." Here, the couple work to solve the murder of a society newlywed. The narrative includes much social commentary about England between the wars and even a fascinating trip through the London sewers. Walsh brings a fresh perspective, but remains true to Sayers's characters and tone. YAs interested in literary British mysteries or those just looking for a good historical novel will appreciate this recasting and may even be led back to the originals.
Chicago Tribune
[Walsh] has done a splendid job-certain to please the legions of Sayers loyalists as well as readers new to the Wimsey canon.
The New York Times Book Review
Engrossing, intelligent, and provocative.
Kirkus Reviews
Lord Peter Wimsey lives again, courtesy of Walsh's completion of a 170-page typescript Sayers abandoned in 1939. In a particularly happy accident for fans whose nostalgia has turned mystery's Golden Age into a historical retreat from the present, Wimsey's return from his honeymoon with mystery novelist Harriet Vane is given the most distinctive real-world political framework of all Sayers's novels: the death of King George V, which plunges England into mourning and into the round of Bertie Windsor's romances. As Wimsey and his bride feast on each other's wit and charm, and Bertie grazes more indiscriminately, news comes from Hampton that noted beauty Rosamund Harwell has been strangled at the cottage her besotted husband never had time to have decorated for her. When theatrical angel Laurence Harwell produces an alibi for his wife's murder, Wimsey, still shaken by his first look at the corpse of a personal acquaintance, makes the rounds of Rosamund's disgraced father, recently released from prison after serving time for fraud; of Streaker and Basher, the lowlife prison mates who were blackmailing him; and of the friends of vanished actress Gloria Tallant, who has a surprisingly close connection to Rosamund. Meanwhile, back in town, Harriet is vanquishing her husband's snobbish sister-in-law with a queenly ease worthy of Richardson's Pamela. The murder plot is ordinary, even creaky in its deceptions, but delighted fansravenous for their first glimpse in over 60 years of Wimsey's foppish relations, Harriet's professional friends, Bunter, Chief Inspector Parker, and the rest will be more than compensated by seeing all the old crowd present and faithfully evoked by Walsh (TheSerpentine Cave, 1997, etc.).

From the Publisher
"A superb job of seamless collaboration..subltle and discursive in the classic sayers manner, Thrones, Domination is a pure pleasure." —The Wall Street Journal

"Extraordinary...it is impossible to tell where Dorothy L. Sayers ends and Jill Paton Waslsh begins." —Ruth Rendell, The London Sunday Times

"[Walsh] has done a splendid job—certain to please the legions of Sayers loyalists as well as readers new to the Wimsey canon." —Chicago Tribune

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9781429913737
Publisher:
St. Martin's Press
Publication date:
03/15/1999
Series:
Lord Peter Wimsey Series , #12
Sold by:
Macmillan
Format:
NOOK Book
Pages:
322
Sales rank:
48,606
File size:
2 MB

Read an Excerpt

Thrones, Dominations


By Dorothy L. Sayers, Jill Paton Walsh

St. Martin's Press

Copyright © 1998 The Trustees of Anthony Fleming (deceased) and Jill Paton Walsh
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-4299-1373-7


CHAPTER 1

They order, said I, this matter better in France.

LAURENCE STERNE


"I do not," said Monsieur Théophile Daumier, "understand the English."

"Nor does anybody," replied Mr. Paul Delagardie, "themselves least of all."

"I see them pass to and fro, I observe them, I talk to them — for I find it is not true that they are silent and unfriendly — but I remain ignorant of their interior life. They are occupied without ceasing, but I do not know the motives for the things they so energetically do. It is not their reserve which defeats me, for often they are surprisingly communicative; it is that I do not know where their communicativeness ends and their reserve begins. They are said to be rigidly conventional, yet they can behave with an insouciance without parallel; and when you question them, they appear to possess no definable theory of life."

"You are quite right," said Mr. Delagardie. "The English are averse to theories. Yet we are, for that reason, comparatively easy to live with. Our conventions are external, and easily acquired; but our philosophies are all individual, and we do not concern ourselves to correct those of others. That is why we permit in our public parks the open expression of every variety of seditious opinion — with the sole proviso that nobody shall so far forget himself as to tear up the railings or trample on the flowers."

"I beg your pardon; I had for the moment forgotten that you also were English. You have so much the outlook, as well as the accent of a Frenchman."

"Thank you," replied Mr. Delagardie. "I am actually only one-eighth French by blood. The other seven-eighths is English, and the proof is that I take what you have said as a compliment. Unlike the Jews, the Irish and the Germans, the English are pleased to be thought even more mongrel and exotic than they are. It appeals to the streak of romantic sensibility in the English temperament. Tell an Englishman that he is pure-bred Anglo-Saxon or a hundred percent Aryan, and he will laugh in your face; tell him that his remote ancestry contains a blend of French, Russian, Chinese or even Arab or Hindu, and he will listen with polite gratification. The remoter, of course, the better; it is more picturesque, and less socially ambiguous."

"Socially ambiguous? Ah! you admit, then, that the Englishman in fact despises all other races but his own."

"Until he has had time to assimilate them. What he despises is not other races but other civilisations. He does not wish to be called a dago; but if he is born with dark eyes and an olive complexion, he is pleased to trace those features back to a Spanish hidalgo, cast away upon the English coast in the wreck of the Great Armada. Everything with us is a matter of sentiment and association."

"A strange people!" said Monsieur Daumier. "And yet, the national type is unmistakable. You see a man — you know at once that he is English, and that is all you ever know about him. Take, for example, the couple at the table opposite. He is, undoubtedly, an Englishman of the leisured and wealthy class. He has a slightly military air and is very much bronzed — but that may be due only to the habit of le sport. One would say, looking at him, that he had no interest in life beyond fox-hunting — except indeed that he is clearly very much enamoured of his extremely beautiful companion. Yet for all I know, he may be a member of parliament, a financier, or a writer of very successful novels. His face tells nothing."

Mr. Delagardie darted a glance at the diners in question.

"Ah, yes!" he said. "Tell me what you make of him and the woman with him. You are right; she is an exquisite creature. I have always had a faiblesse for the true red-blonde. They have the capacity for passion."

"It is, I think, passion that is in question at the moment," replied Monsieur Daumier. "She is, I imagine, mistress and not wife — or rather, for she is married, not his wife. If any generalisation is possible about Englishmen, it is that they take their wives for granted. They do not carefully cultivate the flower of passion with the pruning-scissors. They permit it to seed away into a settled affection, fruitful and natural, but not decorative. Observe them in conversation. Either they do not listen to what their wives say at all, or they attend with the intelligent courtesy one accords to a talkative stranger. Ce monsieur làbas is inattentive, but for another reason: he is absorbed in the lady's personal charms and his mind is concentrated on favours to come. He is, as you say, over head and ears — and I have noticed that in an Englishman that condition betrays itself. He does not, like ourselves, display assiduity to every woman in right of her sex. If he exhibits himself in attitudes of devotion, it is for good reason. I hazard the guess that this is an elopement, or at any rate an adventure; one, perhaps, which he cannot well carry on openly in London. Here, in our wicked Paris, he may let himself go without embarrassment."

"I agree with you," said Mr. Delagardie, "that that is certainly not the typical English married couple. And it is true that the Englishman on the Continent tends to cast off the English convention of reserve — in fact it is part of his convention to do so. You say nothing of the lady."

"She also is in love, but she is aware at the same time of the sacrifice she has made. She asks nothing better than to surrender; nevertheless she knows how to make herself courted; after all, it is the one who risks most who confers the obligation. But when she gives herself, it will be with abandonment. The bronzed gentleman is on the whole to be envied."

"Your observations are of the greatest interest," said Mr. Delagardie. "The more so that they are to a large extent erroneous, as I happen to know. The English, as you say, are baffling. What, for example, do you think of the very different pair in the opposite corner?"

"The fair-haired diplomat with the eye-glass and the decided-looking brunette in orange taffeta?" "He is not precisely a diplomat, but that is the man I mean."

"There," said Monsieur Daumier, in a more assured tone, "I perceive exactly the English married couple par excellence. They are very well bred, the man especially, and they offer a lesson in table manners to the whole room. He consults her about the menu, is particular that she has what she requires, and orders his own dinner to suit himself. If she drops her napkin, he picks it up. When she speaks, he attends and replies politely, but with imperturbable phlegm and almost without looking at her. He is perfectly courteous, and perfectly indifferent, and to this heart-breaking self-possession she opposes a coldness equal to his own. They are no doubt good friends and even agreeable companions by force of custom, since they converse smoothly and with no pauses. The English, when they dislike one another, seldom shout; they withdraw into taciturnity. These two do not, I feel sure, quarrel either in public or in private. They have been married so long that any passionate feeling they ever had for one another has long since died; but perhaps it was never very much, for she is not exceptionally good-looking and he has the air of a man to whom beauty is of some importance. Possibly she was rich and he married her for her money. At any rate he probably conducts his private affairs as he chooses and she accepts the situation, so long as there is no parade of infidelity, for the sake of the children."

Mr. Delagardie poured a little more Burgundy into both glasses before replying.

"You called the man a diplomat," he said at length. "And you have succeeded in proving that at least he does not carry all his private history written in his features. As it happens, I know both couples fairly well, and can set you right on the material facts.

"Take the first pair. The man is Laurence Harwell, and he is the son of a very distinguished and very rich KC who died a few years ago leaving him exceedingly well off. Though brought up in the usual country-house and public-school surroundings, he is not particularly addicted to sport in the English sense of the word. He spends most of his time in town, and dabbles a little in the financing of theatrical ventures. He is bronzed at present because he has just returned from Chamonix; but I think he went there rather to please the lady man himself. She, so far from being his mistress, is actually his own wife, and they have been married just over two years. You are correct in thinking that they are deeply in love with one another, for the match was a highly romantic one. The sacrifices were, however, on his side and not hers; in so far, that is, as there can be any sacrifice in acquiring a supremely beautiful woman. Her father was involved in certain fraudulent transactions which reduced him from considerable wealth to poverty and a short term of imprisonment. Rosamund, his daughter, had been forced to take a post as mannequin in a fashionable dressmaker's establishment when Harwell arrived to rescue her. They are frequently cited as the most idyllic — some go as far as to say, the only — married lovers in London. It is true that they have as yet no children; and this perhaps accounts for the fact that the passion-flower has not yet lost its bloom. They are never happy out of each other's sight — and that is just as well, since both, I fancy, are of a jealous temperament. Needless to say, she has many admirers, but they do not get very much satisfaction, since hers is the kind of amorous temperament that is cold to all but one."

"I repeat," said Monsieur Daumier, "that Mr. Harwell is to be envied. The story is certainly romantic, and different from what I had supposed."

"Yet in essentials," said Mr. Delagardie, "you were not very far wrong. The relation between the two is, to all intents and purposes, that of lover and mistress and not of husband and wife. The other pair are more enigmatical, and perhaps even more romantic.

"The man is certainly well bred, for he is the second son of the late Duke of Denver and, incidentally, my own nephew. He has dabbled a little in diplomacy as in most things, but that is not his profession; if he has any profession at all, it is criminology. He is a lover of beauty in old wine and old books, and has from time to time shown himself a considerable connoisseur of beautiful women. His wife, who is with him now, is a novelist who had hitherto earned her own living; rather over six years ago, she was acquitted, largely by his intervention, of the charge of murdering her lover. My nephew fell in love with her at sight; his pursuit of her was conducted with patience and determination for over five years; they were married last October, and have only just returned from a prolonged honeymoon. I do not precisely know what their present relations are, for it is some weeks since I heard from them; and the honeymoon was complicated by some unfortunate occurrences. A murder was committed in their house and the emotional currents set up while bringing the assassin to justice introduced, I believe, a disturbing factor. My nephew is nervous, fastidious and inhibited; my niece by marriage, obstinate, energetic and independent. They are both possessed of a truly diabolical pride. Mayfair is awaiting with interest the result of this curious matrimonial experiment."

"Do all Englishmen," enquired Monsieur Daumier, "present themselves to their brides in the role of Perseus?"

"All of them would like to do so; but all, perhaps fortunately, have not the opportunity. It is a role difficult to sustain without egotism."

At this moment the man with the monocle got up in response to a summons by the waiter and came down the long hotel dining-room, as though making for the telephone. He signalled a greeting to Mr. Delagardie and passed on, walking very upright, with the swift, light step of a good dancer. As he went, his wife's dark and rather handsome eyes followed him with a peculiarly concentrated expression — not quite puzzled or anxious or apprehensive, though all three adjectives passed through Monsieur Daumier's mind, only to be dismissed.

He said, "I was wrong about your nephew's wife. She is not indifferent. But I think she is not altogether sure of him."

"That," replied Mr. Delagardie, "is quite likely. Nobody is ever sure of my nephew Peter. But I imagine that he is not altogether indifferent, either. If he speaks to her without looking at her, it is probably that he has something to conceal — either love or hatred; I have known both the one and the other to be developed at the end of a honeymoon."

"Evidemment," acquiesced Monsieur Daumier. "It appears to me, from what you say, that the relations between those two must be of a most delicate nature; the more so as neither of them is in the first youth."

"My nephew is rising forty-six, and his wife is in her early thirties. Ah! The Harwells have seen us; I think they are coming over. I know them just a little. The old Harwell was a friend of Sir Impey Biggs, who is a family connection of the Wimseys, and I have met the son and his wife from time to time at social functions."

Monsieur Théophile Daumier was pleased to have the opportunity of viewing Rosamund Harwell more closely. She was a type of which he thoroughly approved. It was not merely the smooth red-gold of the hair, or the liquid amber of the eyes, set a little slanting under the widely springing and delicately pencilled brows; nor was it solely the full red curve of the mouth, or the whiteness of the skin; though all these had a good deal to do with it. The face was heart-shaped; the body, which let itself be rather more than divined beneath the close-fitting gown, suggested to him the unveiled charms of a Botticelli Venus. Such features Monsieur Daumier could appraise at their worth with the controlled appreciation of the connoisseur. What stirred him was the pervasive exhalation of femininity, which went to his head like the ethers of a vintage wine. He was sensitive to such emanations, and was astonished to find them in an Englishwoman; since in the English he was accustomed to encounter either an aggressive sexlessness or a suffocating maternal amiability, almost equally devoid of allurement. The voice, too, in which Mrs. Harwell uttered the commonplace greeting: "How do you do?" — it was warm, vibrant, musical, like a chime of golden bells, a voice with promise in it.

Mr. Delagardie enquired whether the Harwells were making a long stay in Paris.

"We are here for a fortnight," said Rosamund Harwell, "to do some shopping. And, of course, to amuse ourselves."

"Did you enjoy the sports at Chamonix?"

"Very much; but the place was horribly crowded."

Her glance at her husband seemed to pick him out of the crowd and get him alone with her in some kind of isle of enchantment. Monsieur Daumier got the impression that Laurence Harwell was impatient even of this casual exchange of remarks with two gentlemen of mature age in a dining-room. He judged the husband to be about thirty, and the wife at least five years younger. Mr. Delagardie prolonged the conversation with a few more unimportant enquiries — it might have been for the deliberate purpose of allowing his friend to study the romantic English at close quarters. A diversion was caused by the arrival of Mr. Delagardie's nephew, who had meanwhile returned from telephoning and collected his wife.

"Vous voilà, mes enfants," said Mr. Delagardie, indulgently. "I hope you have dined well. Peter, I think you know Mr. and Mrs. Harwell?"

"By name only; we seem always to have just missed one another."

"Then let me introduce you. My nephew, Lord Peter Wimsey, and my niece Harriet. This is my friend, Monsieur Daumier. It is curious that we should all be staying in the same hotel, without connivance, like the characters in a polite comedy."

"Not so very curious," said Wimsey, "when you consider that the cooking is, for the moment, the best in Paris. The comedy will, I fear, not extend to three acts; we are leaving for London tomorrow. We only ran over for a day or two — to get a change of scene."

"Yes," said his uncle. "I read in the papers that the execution had taken place. It must have been very trying for you both." His shrewd old eyes shot from one face to the other.

Wimsey said in a colourless tone, "It was most unfortunate."

He was, thought Monsieur Daumier, colourless altogether: hair, complexion, and light unemphatic voice with its clipped public-school accent.


(Continues...)

Excerpted from Thrones, Dominations by Dorothy L. Sayers, Jill Paton Walsh. Copyright © 1998 The Trustees of Anthony Fleming (deceased) and Jill Paton Walsh. Excerpted by permission of St. Martin's Press.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

What People are Saying About This

Ruth Rendell
Extraordinary...it is impossible to tell where Dorothy L. Sayers ends and Jill Paton Walsh begins.

Meet the Author

Dorothy L. Sayers, the greatest of the golden age detective novelists, was born in Oxford in 1893. Her aristocratic detective, Lord Peter Wimsey, became one of the most popular fictional heroes of the twentieth century. She devoted the last 20 years of her life to playwriting, Christian scholarship, and a new translation of Dante. She died in 1957.

Jill Paton Walsh is the author of books for adults, young adults and children. Her novel Knowledge of Angels was short-listed for the Booker Prize. Her crime novels and mystery novels include The Attenbury Emeralds, A Presumption of Death, The Wyndham Case and A Piece of Justice, which was shortlisted for the Crime Writers' Association Gold Dagger Award. Her novels for children and young adults include The Green Book and A Parcel of Patterns. She lives in Cambridge, England.


Jill Paton Walsh is the author of books for adults, young adults and children. Her novel Knowledge of Angels was short-listed for the Booker Prize. Her crime novels and mystery novels include The Attenbury Emeralds, A Presumption of Death, The Wyndham Case and A Piece of Justice, which was shortlisted for the Crime Writers' Association Gold Dagger Award. With Dorothy L. Sayers, she was co-author of Thrones, Dominations. Her novels for children and young adults include The Green Book and A Parcel of Patterns. She lives in Cambridge, England.

Brief Biography

Date of Birth:
June 13, 1893
Date of Death:
December 17, 1957
Place of Birth:
Oxford, England
Education:
B.A., Oxford University, 1915; M.A., B.C.L., 1920

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews

Thrones, Dominations 4.4 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 9 reviews.
nookpj More than 1 year ago
This combined work of DLS and JPW offers us a post-marriage look at Peter and Harriet as they try to merge their dual careers and personalities. An excellent setting for a mixture of joining lives, sleuthing and artistic temperaments, and murder, of course.
fallafooka More than 1 year ago
This is a well written mystery. I loved every minute of it. Peter Wimsey lives again!
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I love Dorothy Sayer's Peter Wimsey books. Being a real fan of Agatha Christie for many years, it may be surprising to some that I only discovered Sayers' Peter and Harriet a few years ago. When I finished Busman's Honeymoon, I was sad to think that I'd miss reading about Peter and Harriet settling into married life. This book then came to my attention and with a little hesitation since it wasn't all Sayers work, I bought it to see how Ms. Patton would proceed. The mystery part of the book wasn't too surprising in it's resolution and yet it held my attention. The more interesting part to me was the developing relationship with Peter and Harriet. It's clear that they are both sensitive to the potential difficulties that their marriage could bring and try extra hard to be understanding and open. That theirs is a marriage that will succeed is clear throughout the story yet the tender moments where they discover a little more about each other's love will make you smile. I like the way it ended. Of course it all works out! I'll now try the next book, A Presumption of Death, to see how Ms. Patton proceeds with the Wimseys.
compsing More than 1 year ago
I enjoyed the book quite well, though it was not too hard to figure out the killer. The writing is good, and I loved the dialogue between Peter and Harriet. I particularly think Harriet's character is well written. A good summer or rainy day read.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
prussblue10 More than 1 year ago
Walsh continued on in the Sayers tradition providing an excellent Wimsey and Harriet tale.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago