A Lesson to All: Expunging the Myths of both Sides
The fact is Friedman uses his experience of local peoples and places to put some of the most important events in the development of the fault we call the Israeli-Palestinian conflict into a greater historical/geographical context. It can be, if selectively read termed pro-Israeli or anti-Israeli (none daring the term pro-Palestinian). The reality is that the book condemns the slaughters of Sabra and the terrorism of Arafat. Beyond the insighful analysis of the political climate of Lebanon that no democratic power is apt to understand, the display of the way the people deal with these problems: the shellings, the street fights, the car bombs is an excellent psychological picture. Most important, however, is objectivity is in the juxtaposition of counterbalancing Middle Eastern myths: Israeli pioneering kibbutznic and Palestinian guerilla hero. Apart from what many say he blames arafat, not the Israeli's for failing to accept peace offers and destroying the prospects of his people by feeding them with false hope. He also, though, dissects the willingness of the modern Jewish settlers and their feeling of ownership. It is neither one-sided nor partisan, it is reality pure and simple. Until we accept this book, we will never solve the problem of Palestinian authority beause we do not understand the problem. (Previous comments denouncing the books mention respectively: that he says Jews were expelled from 'Palestine 2000 years ago' Granted the timing is slightly off but Jewish Diaspora's accepted starting point was the destruction of the Second Temple and the area was generically known to the people as Palestine - but the point his moot and irrelevant anyway. As to the understanding of Jewish historical/biblical claims it is very well handeled as he goes through the four Jewish groups in Israel. Lastly, it does not unnecessarily vilify the arab world or the palestinian masses. Nor oes it begrudge Israel her right to secure her borders. Rather it displays the horror of terrorism and destruction on both sides. The terrorists are wrong, but are the secretive kidnapping really right? I will not say, but the question is posed well and in clear context.)It is valuable to lend context, personal perspective, inside analysis and open up new areas of thought.
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.