About the Author
Read an Excerpt
But of all other stupendous inventions, what sublimity of mind must have been his who conceived how to communicate his most secret thoughts to any other person, though very far distant either in time or place? And with no greater difficulty than the various arrangement of two dozen little signs upon paper? Let this be the seal of all the admirable inventions of man.
Even a positive thing casts a shadow.... its unique excellence is at the same time its tragic flaw.
--William Irwin Thompson
Of all the sacred cows allowed to roam unimpeded in our culture, few are as revered as literacy. Its benefits have been so incontestable that in the five millennia since the advent of the written word numerous poets and writers have extolled its virtues. Few paused to consider its costs. Sophocles once warned, "Nothing vast enters the life of mortals without a curse." The invention of writing was vast; this book will investigate the curse.
There exists ample evidence that any society acquiring the written word experiences explosive changes. For the most part, these changes can be characterized as progress. But one pernicious effect of literacy has gone largely unnoticed: writing subliminally fosters a patriarchal outlook. Writing of any kind, but especially its alphabetic form, diminishes feminine values and with them, women's power in the culture. The reasons for this shift will be elaborated in the coming pages. For now, I propose that a holistic, simultaneous, synthetic, and concrete view of the world are the essential characteristics of a feminine outlook; linear, sequential, reductionist, and abstract thinking defines the masculine. Although these represent opposite perceptual modes, every individual is generously endowed with all the features of both. They coexist as two closely overlapping bell-shaped curves with no feature superior to its reciprocal.
These complementary methods of comprehending reality resemble the ancient Taoist circle symbol of integration and symmetry in which the tension between the energy of the feminine yin and the masculine yang is exactly balanced. One side without the other is incomplete; together, they form a unified whole that is stronger than either half. First writing, and then the alphabet, upset this balance. Affected cultures, especially in the West, acquired a strong yang thrust.
In the 1960s, Marshall McLuhan proposed that a civilization's principal means of communication molds it more than the content of that communication. McLuhan classified speech, pictographs, ideographs, alphabets, print, radio, film, and television as distinctive information-conveying media, each with its own technology of transmission. He declared that these technologies insinuate themselves into the collective psyche of any society that uses them, and once embedded, stealthily exert a powerful influence on cultural perceptions.
McLuhan's aphorism, "the medium is the message" is the leitmotif of this book. Robert Logan, the author of The Alphabet Effect, expounded on this idea:
A medium of communication is not merely a passive conduit for the transmission of information but rather an active force in creating new social patterns and new perceptual realities. A person who is literate has a different world view than one who receives information exclusively through oral communication. The alphabet, independent of the spoken languages it transcribes or the information it makes available, has its own intrinsic impacts.
While McLuhan, Logan, and others have explored many of the effects that alphabetic literacy has had upon Western history, I wish to narrow the focus to a single question: how did the invention of the alphabet affect the balance of power between men and women?
The proposition that the alphabet has hindered women's aspirations and accomplishments seems, at first glance, to be antithetical to historical facts. Western society, based on the rule of law and constitutional government, has increasingly affirmed the dignity of the individual, and in the last few centuries Western women have won rights and privileges not available in many other cultures. Most people believe that the benefits that have accrued to women are due primarily to a high level of education among the populace. But a study of the origins of writing in less complex times thousands of years ago reveals how writing, first, and then the alphabet, altered the balance of power to women's detriment.
Anthropological studies of non-literate agricultural societies show that, for the majority, relations between men and women have been more egalitarian than in more developed societies. Researchers have never proven beyond dispute that there were ever societies in which women had power and influence greater than or even equal to that of men. Yet, a diverse variety of preliterate agrarian cultures--the Iroquois and the Hopi in North America, the inhabitants of Polynesia, the African !Kung, and numerous others around the world--had and continue to have considerable harmony between the sexes.
Anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss was one of the very few scholars to challenge literacy's worth.
There is one fact that can be established: the only phenomenon which, always and in all parts of the world, seems to be linked with the appearance of writing ... is the establishment of hierarchical societies, consisting of masters and slaves, and where one part of the population is made to work for the other part.
Literacy has promoted the subjugation of women by men throughout all but the very recent history of the West. Misogyny and patriarchy rise and fall with the fortunes of the alphabetic written word.
The key to my thesis lies in the unique way the human nervous system developed, which in turn allowed alphabets to profoundly affect gender relations. The introductory chapters will explore why and how we evolved in the manner we did. In later chapters, I will reinterpret a number of myths and historical events, making correlations based on circumstantial evidence. Correlation, however, does not prove causality--the disappearance of the stars at dawn does not cause the sun to rise. As we examine various sets of facts, I will appeal, therefore, to the court of what archaeologists call competitive plausibility, and I will ask the reader to consider with me which of the hypothetical explanations of historical events is the most plausible.
Although each of us is born with a unique set of genetic instructions, we enter the world as a work-in-progress and await the deft hand of the ambient culture to sculpt the finishing touches. Among the two most important influences on a child are the emotional constellation of his or her immediate family and the configuration of his or her culture. Trailing a close third is the principal medium with which the child learns to perceive and integrate his or her culture's information. This medium will play a role in determining which neuronal pathways of the child's developing brain will be reinforced.
To observe an enthralled four-year-old mastering the letters of the alphabet is to witness the beginning of a lifelong method central to the acquisition of knowledge. Literacy, once firmly rooted, will eclipse and supplant speech as the principal source of culture-changing information. Adults, for so long enmeshed in the alphabet's visual skein, cannot easily disentangle themselves to assess its effect on culture. One could safely assume that fish have not yet discovered water.
Imagine that you came of age in a non-literate culture and were unaware of the impact the written word could have on your life. Suppose that as an adult you then found yourself in a literate society confronted by others who seemed to possess magical powers. Your reaction probably would not differ much from that of Prince Modupe, a young West African who, in his autobiography, related his encounter with the written word:
The one crowded space in Father Perry's house was his bookshelves. I gradually came to understand that the marks on the pages were trapped words. Anyone could learn to decipher the symbols and turn the trapped words loose again into speech. The ink of the print trapped the thoughts; they could no more get away than a doomboo could get out of a pit. When the full realization of what this meant flooded over me, I experienced the same thrill and amazement as when I had my first glimpse of the bright lights of Konakry. I shivered with the intensity of my desire to learn to do this wondrous thing myself.
The prince could not know that in his attempt to free the doomboo, the pit itself would trap him in an unforeseen way: written words and images are entirely different "creatures." Each calls forth a complementary but opposing perceptual strategy.
Images are primarily mental reproductions of the sensual world of vision. Nature and human artifacts both provide the raw material from the outside that the brain replicates in the inner sanctum of consciousness. Because of their close connection to the world of appearances, images approximate reality: they are concrete. The brain simultaneously perceives all parts of the whole integrating the parts synthetically into a gestalt. The majority of images are perceived in an all-at-once manner.
Reading words is a different process. When the eye scans distinctive individual letters arranged in a certain linear sequence, a word with meaning emerges. The meaning of a sentence, such as the one you are now reading, progresses word by word. Comprehension depends on the sentence's syntax, the particular horizontal sequence in which its grammatical elements appear. The use of analysis to break each sentence down into its component words, or each word down into its component letters, is a prime example of reductionism. This process occurs at a speed so rapid that it is below awareness. An alphabet by definition consists of fewer than thirty meaningless symbols that do not represent the images of anything in particular; a feature that makes them abstract. Although some groupings of words can be grasped in an all-at-once manner, in the main, the comprehension of written words emerges in a one-at-a-time fashion.
To perceive things such as trees and buildings through images delivered to the eye, the brain uses wholeness, simultaneity, and synthesis. To ferret out the meaning of alphabetic writing, the brain relies instead on sequence, analysis, and abstraction. Custom and language associate the former characteristics with the feminine, the latter, with the masculine. As we examine the myths of different cultures, we will see that these linkages are consistent.
Associating images with the feminine would seem to fly in the face of numerous scientific studies that demonstrate that males are better at mentally manipulating three-dimensional objects than their female counterparts. Also, numerous other studies reveal that young females are more facile with words, spoken and written, than are their male peers. Despite these studies attributing different image and word skills to each sex, I will present many cultural, mythological, and historical examples that will solidly connect the feminine principle to images and the masculine one to written words. Again, I will use the terms "masculine" and "feminine" in their transcendent sense. Every human is a blend of these two principles.
The life of the mind can be divided into three realms: inner, outer, and supernatural. The inner world of experienced emotions and private thoughts is essentially invisible to others. The outer, concrete world of nature constitutes our environment: it is objective reality. There exists also a third realm: some call it spiritual, some call it sacred, and some call it supernatural. Humans have acknowledged and incorporated this third realm into every culture ever created.
The cosmology of any given culture is analogous to the psyche of an individual. Its myths and religion reveal how the group psyche arrives at its values concerning sex, power, wealth, and gender roles. In hunter-gatherer societies, members generally worship a mixture of male and female spirits. In general, virile spirits tend to be more prestigious in societies that place a high value on hunting; nurturing ones are more highly esteemed wherever gathering is the primary strategy of survival.
Humankind discovered horticulture approximately ten thousand years ago. In the Mediterranean, the most extensively studied region, archaeologists have uncovered strong suggestive evidence that in all emerging agrarian civilizations surrounding the basin, a mother Goddess was a principal deity. From the outer rim of history, we begin to learn Her name. In Sumer, She was Inanna; in Egypt, She was Isis; in Canaan, Her name was Asherah. In Syria, She was known as Astarte; in Greece, Demeter; and in Cyprus, Aphrodite. Whatever Her supplicants called Her, they all recognized Her as the Creatrix of life, nurturer of young, protector of children, and the source of milk, herds, vegetables, and grain. Since She presided over the great mystery of birth, people of this period presumed She must also hold sway over that great bedeviler of human thought--death.
Prior to the development of agriculture, male spirits embodied the attributes of bold, courageous hunters. But in the iconography of the Great Goddess, male imagery paled. Her consort was a companion who was smaller, younger, and weaker than She. A conflation of a son She loved in a motherly way, and a lover She discarded after he consummated his duties of impregnation, he was so dispensable in these ancient myths that he frequently died, either by murder or by accident. In many agrarian cultures, the yearly sacrifice of a young male surrogate in the consort's honor was a common ritual. The participants then plowed the victim's seed blood into the earth as "fertilizer" to ensure that the following year's crop would be bountiful. The clearest demonstration of the Goddess's power was Her ability to bring him back to life each spring. Whether She was resurrecting Her consort or regenerating the earth, Her adherents stood in awe of Her fecundity. For several thousand years, every people throughout the Fertile Crescent venerated a deity who personified the Great Goddess. When we speak of this area as the "cradle" of civilization, we tacitly acknowledge the superior role the feminine principle played in the "birth" of modern humankind.
Then, the Great Goddess began to lose power. The barely legible record of the earliest written accounts beginning about five thousand years ago provides intimations of Her fall. Her consort, once weak and inconsequential, rapidly gained size, stature, and power, until eventually he usurped Her sovereignty. The systematic political and economic subjugation of women followed; coincidentally, slavery became commonplace. Around 1500 B.C., there were hundreds of goddess-based sects enveloping the Mediterranean basin. By the fifth century A.D. they had been almost completely eradicated, by which time women were also prohibited from conducting a single major Western sacrament.
In their attempts to solve the mystery of the Goddess's dethronement, various authors have implicated foreign invaders, the invention of private property, the formation of archaic states, the creation of surplus wealth, and the educational disadvantaging of women. While any or all of these influences may have contributed, I propose another: the decline of the Goddess began when some clever Sumerian first pressed a sharp stick into wet clay and invented writing. The relentless spread of the alphabet two thousand years later spelled Her demise. The introduction of the written word, and then the alphabet, into the social intercourse of humans initiated a fundamental change in the way newly literate cultures understood their reality. It was this dramatic change in mind-set, I propose, that was primarily responsible for fostering patriarchy.
The Old Testament was the first alphabetic written work to influence future ages. Attesting to its gravitas, multitudes still read it three thousand years later. The words on its pages anchor three powerful religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Each is an exemplar of patriarchy. Each monotheistic religion features an imageless Father deity whose authority shines through His revealed Word, sanctified in its written form. Conceiving of a deity who has no concrete image prepares the way for the kind of abstract thinking that inevitably leads to law codes, dualistic philosophy, and objective science, the signature triad of Western culture. I propose that the profound impact these ancient scriptures had upon the development of the West depended as much on their being written in an alphabet as on the moral lessons they contained.
Goddess worship, feminine values, and women's power depend on the ubiquity of the image. God worship, masculine values, and men's domination of women are bound to the written word. Word and image, like masculine and feminine, are complementary opposites. Whenever a culture elevates the written word at the expense of the image, patriarchy dominates. When the importance of the image supersedes the written word, feminine values and egalitarianism flourish. In this book we will explore what this has meant throughout the human past, and in later chapters will consider what it says about the present and portends for the future.
Table of ContentsThe Alphabet Versus the Goddess Preface
3. Right Brain/Left Brain
4. Males: Death/Females: Life
26. Illiteracy/Celibacy, 500-1000
27. Muslin Veils/Muslim Words
28. Mystic/Scholastic, 1000-1300
29. Humanist/Egoist, 1300-1500
33. Positive/Negative, 1648-1899
34. Id/Superego, 1900-1945
35. Page/Screen, 1945-2000
What People are Saying About This
The Alphabet Versus the Goddess is as brilliant as it is well-wrought, an intricate weaving of past and present told in a story that is never less than absorbing. A wonderful book.
Leonard Shlain may himself be the quintessential fusion of word and image. With superb writing, he draws for us a fascinating account of the evolution of our male and female ways of knowing, of the curses -- not just the blessings -- of reverence for the word alone. As a history and science lesson, this book is a vivid, breathing page-turner. As a threshold to a new perception of our history and our future, it offers both chilling reminders and great hope. Yes, great hope.
A bold and masterful work. I couldn't put the book down.
A tour de force, with stunning new insights about gender relations, language, and consciousness.
Reading Group Guide
This groundbreaking book proposes that the rise of alphabetic literacy reconfigured the human brain and brought about profound changes in history, religion, and gender relations. Making remarkable connections across brain function, myth, and anthropology, Dr. Shlain shows why pre-literate cultures were principally informed by holistic, right-brain modes that venerated the Goddess, images, and feminine values. Writing drove cultures toward linear left-brain thinking and this shift upset the balance between men and women, initiating the decline of the feminine and ushering in patriarchal rule. Examining the cultures of the Israelites, Greeks, Christians, and Muslims, Shlain reinterprets ancient myths and parables in light of his theory. Provocative and inspiring, this book is a paradigm-shattering work that will transform your view of history and the mind.
ABOUT LEONARD SHLAIN
Leonard Shlain is the author of the acclaimed Art and Physics: Parallel Visions in Space, Time, and Light, soon to be a twenty-three-part MSNBC TV series. He has written for many publications, including the Los Angeles Times, and lectures widely on the connection between art and science, and on the subject of this book. A true Renaissance man, he is also the chief of laproscopic surgery at the UC San Francisco Medical Center. He lives in Mill Valley, California.
A CONVERSATION WITH LEONARD SHLAIN
You base your thesis on the idea that literacy—or the use of the alphabet—is primarily a left-brain activity, one that also represses right-brain activity. Can you elaborate on how the repression of right-brain activities would lead to misogynist societies?
When we speak and listen we use both sides of the brain. The left hemisphere processes the words linearly. Simultaneously, the right hemisphere evaluates speech's nonverbal clues such as body language and vocal inflection. Literacy, in contrast, depends primarily on the skills of the left hemisphere of men and women. I believe the right hemisphere (of both men and women who are right-handed) processes tasks traditionally female. The left hemisphere (of both men and women who are right-handed) processes tasks traditionally male. Literacy reinforces the masculine left hemisphere and devalues the right lobe, and this factor inflamed misogyny in literate societies. This occurred in the brains of both men and women, each of whom possesses a masculine side and a feminine side. Of course, it isn't as neat as I have explained here, but these are the bones of my thesis.
What, exactly, compelled you to research the effects of left-brain values on civilization? What came first: the thesis or the research?
I was electrified by the split brain research of the '60s. As a surgeon, I have operated on carotid arteries to the brain. I also was deeply affected by the ideas of media theorist Marshall McLuhan. In 1991, I went on an archaeological tour of Mediterranean sites and was intrigued by the overwhelming evidence of a time when both men and women worshipped goddesses. By the time Judaism, Christianity, and Islam became the West's only three religions, goddesses had disappeared. It occurred to me that this event coincided with the time when people were learning to read and write. I suspected that there was something in the way people learned this new skill that reconfigured their brains. I hypothesized that the demise of the goddess was an inside job.
How do your findings about right- and left-brain values apply to your own dual careers as surgeon and writer?
Surgery is very yang and a little yin, writing is very yin and a little yang. Being both a writer and a surgeon provides a considerable balance to my life. Also, surgeons are steeped in science and are trained in a very left-brained manner early on. But the actual practice of surgery is very right-brained. It is tactile, intuitive, and very visual- spatial. Further, surgeons are the essence of hunter-killers seeking and rooting out disease literally with their hands. Very masculine. And yet, caring for patients during one of the most frightening and painful episodes of their lives requires tenderness and empathy. Surgery is caring and hunting.
Your description of the evolution of the early male and female body and brain is fascinating. If you were to make a conjecture, how would you guess that our bodies and brains are developing now?
Our success as the only truly predatory primate was primarily due to two incompatible features. One was our need to remain bipedal so we could walk on the ground and keep our hands free. The other was a constant need to increase cleverness by enlarging the brain. Babies' heads became so big that they became stuck in the mother's birth canal. Hominid females began to die in childbirth. Something had to give. Nature redesigned the human nervous system. Lacking hardly any instincts, humans are born helpless, but they possess a brain capable of acquiring incredible amounts of knowledge. A split brain simplified the wiring for a language brain. Language allows us to learn easily. We have continued to evolve by adding outside peripherals to our brain. The first was culture enhanced by spoken language. Then came writing, libraries, the printing press, photography, film, television, and now computers and the Internet. Each new technology of information transfer makes humans smarter and more knowledgeable and it is these extra-somatic pieces of our brain that are changing us even though our bodies remain the same.
Was there more of a dichotomy between men and women and left- and right-brain behavior at the dawn of civilization?
We can only make speculative assumptions concerning the structure of human societies long ago. Evidence seems to suggest that gender roles were more firmly established in hunter-gatherer societies than they are presently. We are social predators similar to lions, wolves, and killer whales that hunt in cooperative packs. In other social predators, the females play a leading role in the hunting and killing. In humans, hunting is left primarily to the males because crying babies cannot be brought along. Human offspring require more care from their mothers than the offspring of any other life form. What other female would come to the aid of its offspring if it called for help twenty-five years after the date of birth? Despite the considerable differences in the principal labors of each sex, there was a tacit recognition of the importance of one to the other. An economic and emotional interdependence fostered a greater level of equality than would exist in many more advanced empires that came later. There is evidence that we have been split-brained and split-handed since ancient times. Prehistoric artists painted outlines of their left hands in eighty percent of examples studied, suggesting that the same percentage were right-handed. Presently, the ratio is ninety-two percent right-handed people to eight percent left-handed. Some factor changed in culture to skew these ratios. I believe it was literacy.
Are we evolving into more integrated societies as a whole? How do literacy and other forms of communication influence this development?
Yes. I believe that McLuhan's aphorism "the medium is the message" provides the insight into the effect on culture of its principal form of communication. It isn't only the content of information that can change us, it is the process by which we perceive the information. Speaking and listening are very different activities from writing and reading. The former engages both sides of the brain but the latter relies more on one: the masculine side of both men and women. This factor bolsters patriarchy and misogyny and unbalances culture.
You state that "there is something inherently anti-female in the written word. Men obsessed with the written word tend to be sexist." Can you elaborate on this point? What does it mean to be "obsessed" with the written word? What happens to women obsessed with writing?
There is a neurological condition known as hypergraphia. Hypergraphia afflicts men disproportionately. Compulsive diarists possess a lesion in their left brain that causes them to write excessively, detailing every aspect of their life. They often endow their tedious writings with great religious significance. In general, hypergraphics are rigid, humorless, domineering, and unsympathetic. One could easily imagine how women, feminine values, and intuition would fare if one of these patients was in a position of power. This profile, however, fits many Western religious leaders. Augustine, Jerome, Luther, and Calvin spent great portions of their lives writing long religious tracts. These men were "obsessed" with the importance of their written words. Using fear and threats to carry out their aims, they were all misogynists whose writings turned people away from the goddess, nature, and the feminine.
Poets and novelists use metaphors, a right hemispheric form of language. They "paint" images with words and differ from writers of abstract works. As an exercise, try to come up with the name of a significant male writer who wrote long dense tomes about religion and philosophy and who also was not a misogynist.
Women are generally not as affected by the masculinizing tendencies of the written words because the brains of women are not nearly as sharply divided as the brains of men. Women in general do not as often as men express extremes. Women who write feminist polemical books tend to express themselves more in their masculine modes.
You discuss at length the horrors visited upon the aboriginal peoples living in the New World by its conquerors—sixteenth-century Europeans "driven mad by the printing press"—and you wonder how such an invasion would have been different if the conquering culture had been more tolerant, such as the early Romans under Julius Caesar. How exactly does pre-literacy impact on a culture's tolerance? Weren't ancient and modern invaders of non-Western lands equally bloodthirsty and destructive?
Belligerency appears to be a fairly universal human trait. Nevertheless, the least war like societies seem to be pre-literate agricultural societies. Iroquois Indians, for example, maintained the Great Peace in the Northeast for over three hundred years. Hunter/gatherer, pastoral, and nomadic cultures tend to be more "bloodthirsty." There is no evidence that Neolithic agricultural people ever fought organized wars. The most contentious periods in Western history were those characterized by high literacy rates: Classical Greece, Imperial Rome, the Renaissance, and Europe of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The roots of mayhem are complex but I feel that alphabet literacy has been an overlooked factor.
How does the Internet fit in with your hypothesis? Like the printing press, it duplicates type, and must be read. And yet it also sends out an image, making use of right-brain skills. Is the Internet an example of the kind of unifying trend you see as part of current civilization's makeup? Or will it present its own problems for historians and anthropologists of future centuries to analyze and discuss?
The computer and the Internet will once again reconfigure the brains of those that use them. Typing is a two-handed activity that requires input from both sides of the brain. Writing requires only the dominant hand. The use of a mouse by the right hand necessitates the activation of right-hemispheric visual-spatial skills. The World Wide Web and the Internet are not linear, they are holistic. All ancient deities associated with webs and nets were goddesses. Many of the processes we use to operate a computer are inherently feminine.
What criticisms have your theories elicited? How would you address them?
The main criticism stems from people hearing about the theory but not reading the book and misinterpreting what I have proposed. I am not saying that men read better than women or that men's left brains are better than women's. I am not saying that people shouldn't read or that television is an unqualified benefit. Some feminists resent that a man has written a book about the goddess. Mea culpa. Some academics are appalled that a non-specialist has wandered through their turf. Mea culpa. And some reviewers believe that interpreting all history through a narrow lens is too simplistic. To write a book of such sweeping scope, I had to leave out a lot of alternative possibilities. This does not mean that I am unaware of them. In general, the book has been very favorably reviewed and many people are excited to have a neuroanatomical hypothesis to explain a historical enigma.
You set forth an optimistic view of the present and the future, of a world in which the "right-hemisphere values of tolerance, caring, and respect for nature" will help correct some of the damage that has been wrought over the past two millennia. What sorts of changes do you envision in terms of human behavior, technology, and communication? What, if any, dangers exist in a world dominated by right-hemisphere values?
Human advances move in fits and starts. Technology has moved us all to a global village. Tolerance has markedly increased. Religious wars are on the wane. Fundamentalism is in retreat. Dogmatic ideologies have been discredited. At the same time, human rights are moving forward. Women's status is on the upswing. And a newfound respect and love for nature is evident in the burgeoning ecology movement. There remains much work to be done but I believe that as image and word come into balance, so too will left and right hemispheres, and masculine and feminine. All extremes have dangers and too much emphasis on right-hemispheric modes could lead to superstitions, sensual excesses, and a loss of scientific advances. Despite these concerns, I think we are living in a New Renaissance fueled by the Iconic Revolution.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
As a dedicated reader with many thousands of books behind me, I have rarely put down a volume saying, "This book changed my life." By that I mean that I will never think about certain things in the same way. For decades I have wondered why religions are so damned complex and counterintuitive; why there had to be a "dominant" sex; why war, torture, and inhumanity in civilized societies. Why was the Old Testament God so self absorbed, so remote, so vengeful? Why was the New Testament Jesus transmogrified from a simple carpenter whose greatest act was dying, then disappearing from the tomb, when his living was the examplar of dignity, tolerance, gentleness and kindness? Why do people of the book (representing the world's three great literate religions (Islam, Judaism, and Christianity) seem to be the most resistant to modernism? These questions and many more were answered in this book. The writer, whom I tried but failed to understand in "Art and Physics," captured my attention in this book immediately with his blend of religion, philosophy, human behavior, and history. I feel changed by at last being able to relate the rise and fall of civilizations to a meaningful series of developmental events. This should be fascinating reading for anyone interested in why people act like they do from the Garden of Eden to today's corporate culture. Dr. Shlain has really gotten my attention and I recommend this book to everyone I know.
I'm intrigued, but not surprised, by the polarized remarks elicited by this book - great books do that, and this one is no exception. The premise of Dr. Shlain's book cuts to the moral-ethical core of Western and Eastern civilizations and addresses the provocative question, why do men rule instead of women? Of course, by men he means masculine 'virtues' of agression, physical domination, might-makes-right, survival of the fittest, id-ego, and all those other explanations that we men use to justify our wants and needs. The author asks simply, why didn't feminine values (nurturing, loving, inclusion) reign supreme? The answer that he proposes is based upon the well-known split-brain phenomenon in neuropsychology, i.e., each human being harbors two distinct personalities governed by separate regions in the right and left hemispheres. The masculine left brain specializes in analytical, rational thought processes used in alphabet-based language and mathematics. The feminine right brain uses intuitive, wholistic thought processes important in metaphor-based language and image recognition (for more information, read about Dr. Roger Sperry's Nobel Prize winning studies and the related titles below). Dr. Shlain proposes that male domination corresponded with rapid development of the left brain promoted initially by the invention of the alphabet (and further expanded by progress in mathematics, writing, and the printing press). At each stage, he cites cultural changes that devalued feminine values and promoted male domination. Not since Freud has there been such a bold, innovative attempt to understand the source of the battle of the sexes. This book will be of interest to anyone unsatisfied with the standard theories couched in psychoanalytical and evolutionary perspectives. This book reaches for a higher ground of discourse between the sexes.
I liked the book because I was able to apply some of my own knowledge of the history of the Universe (evolution) in order to understand the view of the shaping of 'man'kind. I struggled with my religious beliefs while reading the book. I no longer envision God as a man with a white beard looking down at me. This book questions the authority which the written word can have upon people (religious books for example). It does NOT question the virtues of Moses or Jesus or Buddha or Muhammad or the Tao Way. It did show me some ugly history that religious followers might not want to know. 'Witch burning' of precious but overly powerful women by a church biased toward men is just one. It makes me think abstract beliefs (combined with a powerful communication process) and masculine values that are recognized more than feminine ones, has caused some problems in the past. The author made a stiking, but logical, blow at languages that have the weak and powerless words usually in the feminine tense. I'd treat the author to lunch anytime just for thinking so originally. Even if everything in the book is not perfectly true, the major 'bones' of the communication tools affecting the way humans think is (I believe) in conjunction with the truth.
A 'absolute' read for academicians, historians, sociologists, psychologists, philosophers. educators, et al. It is one of the most explanatory surveys of the evolution of the human condition (sociology) that I had the good fortune to come upon. The now obvious limitations of language as they impinge upon rationalist attempts to evaluate existential realities are here given biological,sociological and historical foundations. Millenia of distortions vis a vis 'male-female' orientations are factually and reasonably addressed with definitively substantive argumentation. The bibliography and chapter notes make this a classic research 'tool' for any student of the afore-mentioned diciplines. Additionally, it offers any person in positions of social responsiblity (government and politics) a realization of the 'roots' of generally accepted social attitudes and conditions of human behaviors. It is a 'must' read for anyone who offers to 'speak to' or 'legislate for' society, national or international. I cannot recomment it too highly.
I am all over the map in rating this book. In the end, I am unconvinced, and I think it has a lot of errors and inconsistencies, but it asks interesting questions that are worth examining whether or not the author's thesis is correct. There are parts that deserve five stars and parts that deserve one. I started it with great hope - avid reader though I am, I love books that carefully explore unusual ideas, like the downside of literacy. In the beginning, Shlain seemed so precise and careful that I expected this to be well-thought out. It fell apart fast - I almost quit reading halfway through. I did love his ending argument that visual media are restoring a balance, although that is mostly my impatience with people who regard every change as the end of the world. My greatest problem is the inconsistency between societies that according to Shlain's thesis should be similar. The Romans and the Jews, for instance: both encouraged universal male literacy using an alphabet. If the alphabet caused the Jews to be monotheistic, shun images and denigrate women, how is it that it that the Romans, as Shlain describes them, were polytheistic, religiously tolerate (for the most part), avid consumers of visual arts, and gave women an unusually high-standing in society? Similarly, the Egyptians and the Chinese both used graphs instead of letters, which Shlain regards as more benign. Yet he claims that Egyptian woman had a very high status and lots of rights whereas Chinese women were oppressed. Granted that things besides literacy affect society, but these are the very points that it is supposed to affect most strongly. There are also other things that seem illogical. Shlain's thesis is that Archaic or Neolithic agricultural societies were nurturing and at least gender-equal if not matriarchal. Then how is it that Egyptian women, in a literate society, are described as having the highest status in the area? How is it that the Jews, with an alphabet and a high literacy rate (the only thing worse is a printing press), are supposed to have invented morality, compassion and social welfare? Wouldn't these things more logically belong to the illiterate Nurturing Neolithics? And how would we compare these societies? There is evidence from Neolothic burials that they did take care of people unable to fend for themselves. I also question some of the facts. So in China, they tended to form stable empires and weren't warlike? The Chinese Empire just "formed" did it, no violence involved? Why are the generally illiterate nomads thought of as so warlike? Shlain says that Henry VIII took up with Anne Boleyn when she was 17 and beheaded her when she was 19. Since Anne's date of birth and the early history of her involvement are uncertain, I wouldn't argue with Shlain about her being 17, although now she is usually thought to have been in her mid-twenties. However, between the beginning of the annulment process and her death was closer to nine years, he obviously has his facts wrong. A minor point, but there are enough similar examples to make me wonder. I also suspect that the right brain/female and left brain/male dichotomy has been overdone. Since women have no trouble learning to read, one has to wonder how it is the literacy was a male province. Still there is a lot to think about in this book, and approached in the right spirit, it's always good to look at things from a new angle and reconsider conventional wisdom.
Shlain presents an exhaustive (and exhausting) tramp through written history to support his thesis that changes in the dominant form of communication upset the balance between brain hemispheres. Replication of this imbalance at a cultural level leads to violence, intolerance, and misogyny. Shlain batters the reader with post hoc evidence and bludgeons them so monotonously with his thesis that I found it difficult to accept even the points with which I agreed¿this in spite of his own acknowledgment that correlation does not prove causality.
very challenging read. I took notes before & during my reading, and in the end Shlain convinced me that written language and gender are deeply connected
This book takes a cardiovascular surgeon view point on neurophysiology of the brain psychology, and the use of brain function in culture and its predictable social response. This book takes theoretical approach similar to educated analysis in physical anthropology with how the human mind functions.This is an excellent book.
I did not read this book by Shlain but I read his previous book, the one that got past the critics. The one about Art and Science. I took a class at Vista college in Berkeley by some guy who was convinced that Shlain is some kind of genius. As a treat at the end of the class Shlain came and did a book pitch for this gem.We had the opportunity to have him sign it after an astonishing lecture with slides about the "new theories" of human evolution that came out of Shlain.Shlain is a brain surgeon by trade and he has many various intellectual avocations which he has incorporated into his hodge-podge of tripe that has found regard for in certain circles of academia. He is the Philosopher in residence at UC Davis.One of his personal observations is that computers needed to be devised to assist the human species with a continuation of child birthing. He said at the lecture that babies heads have become so large due to the pressure of all the new scientific advancements and such that a person being born now has a greatly increased skull size. The womens pelvises are no longer large enough to pass these monstrously large skulls through in child birth, therefore we needed computers to take some of the knowledge out of our heads and keep the size of baby heads at a reasonable dimension. But what I found most offensive is the stuff about about the use of the alphabet and its effect on the health of the human mind in general. He suggests that language is a toxic material that will be eliminated over time as the superior female mind begins to overwhelm the world through the creation of a new pictograph language being brought about by the computer age. This is being embraced by new age feminist pagans as a cool idea. It is incredibly anti-intellectual. It is fascistic in its core. It is a notion of eliminating all history and reason to be reinterpreted by these new esoteric beings, the new god women. He is just a cuddly fruitcake.
A real challenge to the idea that human history has been a continuous march upward. Posits that the arrival of language and its linear sensibility served to diminish the role and value of women. Some factual errors, but overall a fascinating theory that you don't need to accept to appreciate. Paired with the new assessments of how agriculture impacted human health (see The Third Chimpanzee for a quick summary,) and you may have a whole new way of thinking about history.
I have given several copies of this book to my daughters and friends. The writer challenges the reader to rethink old paradigms and examine the relationship of power to knowledge. Whether it be a Higher Power or career power, power is found in knowledge and wisdom. The book moves the reader through time examining those who hold the domain of the Word and therefore power. The reader is left feeling very empowered to live in our current world and challenged to gain more knowledge. . . and therefore power. Prepare to buy this book for others, especially who those who may be on a spiritual quest or may need encouragement toward empowerment.
This is an amazingly deceptive treatise--it is well written and enchanting, but horribly derelict in correlation to reality. The author begins with a crusade and fits disparate, unproven and controversial data from unknown and suspect sources, mixes in a bit of breast beating apology, ('Don't take anything in this book to be truthful--just interesting!')and serves up a polemic. Yes, Virginia, men are different from women--but to blame literacy is a stretch. I love books so much that I could never throw one away--so I left this one on an airplane 'accidently'.
I look at my bookcase and what do I see? Books by women... many books by woman. I go to the library and who do I see? Women reading...women reading books. We are a remarkably literate gender and one for whom written communication seems to come so naturally. As a budding author with a background in psychology and education I simply do not think that the author has effectively supported his rather outlandish thesis.