The Last Lion: Winston Spencer Churchill, Volume 2: Alone, 1932-1940

The Last Lion: Winston Spencer Churchill, Volume 2: Alone, 1932-1940


View All Available Formats & Editions
Eligible for FREE SHIPPING
  • Want it by Thursday, September 27?   Order by 12:00 PM Eastern and choose Expedited Shipping at checkout.


The Last Lion: Winston Spencer Churchill, Volume 2: Alone, 1932-1940 by William Manchester

ALONE is the second volume in William Manchester's projected three-volume biography of Winston Churchill. In it Manchester challenges the assumption that Churchill's finest hour was as a wartime leader.

During the years 1932-1940, he was tested as few men are. Pursued by creditors, he remained solvent only by his writing. He was disowned by his party, dismissed by the establishment as a warmonger and twice nearly lost his seat in Parliament. Churchill stood alone against Nazi aggression and the British policy of appeasement.

Manchester brings new insight to this complex, fascinating period of history without ever losing sight of Churchill the man--a man with limitations--but a man whose vision was global and whose courage was boundless.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780385313315
Publisher: Random House Publishing Group
Publication date: 09/28/1989
Edition description: Reissue
Pages: 800
Sales rank: 111,739
Product dimensions: 5.35(w) x 8.09(h) x 1.69(d)

About the Author

William Manchester was a hugely successful popular historian and biographer whose books include The Last Lion, Volumes 1 and 2, Goodbye Darkness, A World Lit Only by Fire, The Glory and the Dream, The Arms of Krupp, American Caesar, The Death of the President, and assorted works of journalism.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See All Customer Reviews

The Last Lion: Winston Spencer Churchill, Volume 2: Alone, 1932-1940 4.6 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 18 reviews.
t-s-hinton More than 1 year ago
..Quite simply an outstanding account of Churchill and his involvement in the events leading up to 1940. It is a terrible loss that Manchester passed away before he could complete his third volume on his great subject. In some ways the book reads like a thriller, as ominous events occur throughout Europe, he brings us Churchill, barking his warnings from the backbenches of parliament....Banished there because of his stance on India, and kept there by his loyalty to a flawed King... account that brings clarity to this particular time-period like no other
Guest More than 1 year ago
I enjoyed this book maybe not so much for how it was written but for the man whose life is revealed. I thought I knew Winston Churchill from PBS and other passing bits of information, but now I realize I had no idea. Mr. Manchester, author, has a talent of getting out of Winston's way and just letting the man's life tell its own story. If you're a big fan of the life on Neville Chamberlain - don't read this book. If you're not in favor of world leaders being proactive and even preemptive the examples shown here may challenge your thinking. Be advised that where the titles of these two books leave you with the impression that this is a trilogy, sadly Mr. Manchester isn't going to write the third book. Still really good reading.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
A man of his time as well as all time.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
This is the best book of the trilogy, outlining the circumstances that led up to WWII as well as the steadfastness of Churchill during the time he was warning that civilization was being threatened and was ignored, patronized and ostracized for his stance.  Excellent.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
A classic biography. Thoroughly researched and well written. Brings to life one of the great characters of the 20th century.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
What if England had listened to Churchill and learned that Adolf Hitler was not an hororable man. What if the French had left the safety of the Maginot Line and had crossed the Rhine to challenge Hitler and the Naxis. What if the Royal Navy had at least gone and threatened Germany's northern coast line. What if the French had left the Maginot Line in 1939 to challenge the western border of Germany during the invasion of Poland. Hindsight is 20/20 but how the the victors of World War 1 have lost the peace?
Jazzlover More than 1 year ago
I've read numerous biographies of Churchill and Manchester's is the best written and researched.  Sir Winston was the greatest political leader of the 20th century and one of most effective in England's long history, all of which is clear in Manchester's  wonderful masterwork. 
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Beirut768 More than 1 year ago
(1 of 2) is posted in Vol I, 1874-1932 ....

Russia, the protector of the Greek Orthothox Armenian population, sent her best troops in the Caucasus. The Turkish, Vice-Generalissimo Enver Pasha, supreme commander of the ex Ottoman Empire armed forces, was a very ambitious man. His aim and everpresent dream was to conquer central Asia. Enver Pasha, like Winston Churchill, was not a practical soldier. He launched an offensive with 100,000 soldiers against the Russians in the Caucasus in December of 1914.

His main enemy was the severe Weather conditions.

Insisting on a frontal attack against Russian positions in the mountains , Enver lost over 80% of his troops at the Battle of Sarikamis, in the heart of the tough winter season.

In 1917, Russian Grand Duke Nicholas assumed senior control over the Caucasus front. Nicholas tried to have a railway built from Russia (Georgia) to the conquered territories with a view to bringing up more supplies for a new offensive. But, in March of 1917 (February in the pre-revolutionary Russian calendar), the Czar was overthrown in the February Revolution and the Russian army began to slowly fall apart.
Hence, the protector of the Armenians was gone.

Winston Churchill blunder in Gallipoli, opened patched over wounds and re-ignited animosities between the Turks and their Armenian neighbors. In 1915, the Armenians were the victims of his cowardice. The Turks committed a HOLOCAUST against the Armenians that immediately started after WC debacle in Gallipolis.

The mass murder of the Armenians was indeed the first Holocaust of the twentieth century.