The Social Roots of Authoritarianism
Why are some authoritarian regimes highly competitive and others highly unified? Do they function differently? And what does it mean for our understanding of democracy and democratization?

In The Social Roots of Authoritarianism, Natalia Forrat describes two models of authoritarianism: the first in which people see the state as their team leader and the other where they trust informal (non-state) leaders and see the state as a source of perks or punishment. Depending on which vision of the state is dominant in society, she argues that autocrats must use different tools to consolidate their regimes or risk a pushback. If people view the state as their team leader, autocrats rely on social conformity and teamwork logic. If people view the state as an outsider, autocrats rely on clientelist bargains and utility maximization logic. Unpacking the grassroot mechanisms maintaining unity-based and division-based authoritarianisms further, Forrat compares the structures of political machines in four Russian regions. She finds that the two regions with centralized organizational structures bound by social solidarity and team logic delivered predictable, stable results across multiple elections. But the other two regions that relied on decentralized structures with multiple levels of brokers acting independently of each other were less effective in delivering stable results.

Carefully crafted and sophisticated, Forrat's theory of authoritarian power sheds new light on state-society relations in Russia. But it is also broadly applicable beyond Russia and helps explain the divergent patterns of regime maintenance strategies in authoritarian countries throughout the world.
1145613964
The Social Roots of Authoritarianism
Why are some authoritarian regimes highly competitive and others highly unified? Do they function differently? And what does it mean for our understanding of democracy and democratization?

In The Social Roots of Authoritarianism, Natalia Forrat describes two models of authoritarianism: the first in which people see the state as their team leader and the other where they trust informal (non-state) leaders and see the state as a source of perks or punishment. Depending on which vision of the state is dominant in society, she argues that autocrats must use different tools to consolidate their regimes or risk a pushback. If people view the state as their team leader, autocrats rely on social conformity and teamwork logic. If people view the state as an outsider, autocrats rely on clientelist bargains and utility maximization logic. Unpacking the grassroot mechanisms maintaining unity-based and division-based authoritarianisms further, Forrat compares the structures of political machines in four Russian regions. She finds that the two regions with centralized organizational structures bound by social solidarity and team logic delivered predictable, stable results across multiple elections. But the other two regions that relied on decentralized structures with multiple levels of brokers acting independently of each other were less effective in delivering stable results.

Carefully crafted and sophisticated, Forrat's theory of authoritarian power sheds new light on state-society relations in Russia. But it is also broadly applicable beyond Russia and helps explain the divergent patterns of regime maintenance strategies in authoritarian countries throughout the world.
99.0 In Stock
The Social Roots of Authoritarianism

The Social Roots of Authoritarianism

by Natalia Forrat
The Social Roots of Authoritarianism
The Social Roots of Authoritarianism

The Social Roots of Authoritarianism

by Natalia Forrat

Hardcover

$99.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Ships in 1-2 days
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

Why are some authoritarian regimes highly competitive and others highly unified? Do they function differently? And what does it mean for our understanding of democracy and democratization?

In The Social Roots of Authoritarianism, Natalia Forrat describes two models of authoritarianism: the first in which people see the state as their team leader and the other where they trust informal (non-state) leaders and see the state as a source of perks or punishment. Depending on which vision of the state is dominant in society, she argues that autocrats must use different tools to consolidate their regimes or risk a pushback. If people view the state as their team leader, autocrats rely on social conformity and teamwork logic. If people view the state as an outsider, autocrats rely on clientelist bargains and utility maximization logic. Unpacking the grassroot mechanisms maintaining unity-based and division-based authoritarianisms further, Forrat compares the structures of political machines in four Russian regions. She finds that the two regions with centralized organizational structures bound by social solidarity and team logic delivered predictable, stable results across multiple elections. But the other two regions that relied on decentralized structures with multiple levels of brokers acting independently of each other were less effective in delivering stable results.

Carefully crafted and sophisticated, Forrat's theory of authoritarian power sheds new light on state-society relations in Russia. But it is also broadly applicable beyond Russia and helps explain the divergent patterns of regime maintenance strategies in authoritarian countries throughout the world.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780197790359
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication date: 11/08/2024
Pages: 272
Product dimensions: 6.65(w) x 9.30(h) x 0.90(d)

About the Author

Natalia Forrat is a Lecturer in the Center for Russian, East European, and Eurasian studies at the University of Michigan's International Institute. She is a scholar of authoritarianism, state-society relations, mobilization, and civil society. She obtained her PhD from Northwestern University and held academic fellowships and appointments at Stanford, the University of Notre Dame, and the University of Michigan.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments
Introduction
Chapter 1: Authoritarian Power in Statist and Anti-Statist Societies
Chapter 2: A Tale of Four Regions
Chapter 3: Team State vs Outsider State: Public Organizations in Statist and Anti-Statist Societies
Chapter 4: The Political and the Civic: Political Machines in Anti-Statist and Statist Societies
Chapter 5: The Riddle of Russian Authoritarianism
Conclusion
References
Appendix 1: Quantitative Analysis
Appendix 2: Fieldwork Data Collection and Analysis
Appendix 3: Data on Social Policy in Kemerovo Region
Appendix 4: Newspaper Publications Related to Residential Committees and Community Centers in Kemerovo and to Their Role in Politics
Appendix 5: Newspaper Publications Related to Veterans' (Pensioners') Organizations and Their Role in Politics
Appendix 6: List of Interviews
Index
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews